Skip to main content

Ohio's John Husted had done everything in his power leading up to the election to turn the electoral votes in Ohio for Mitt Romney. Notably, constantly playing with the early voting days. On Jansing & Co. he was called the Secretary of Supression.

“Let us not forget that he is the secretary of state in this state who appealed all the way to the United States Supreme Court to try to take away the last three days of early voting,” Turner told MSNBC host Chris Jansing. “It’s laughable now that he wants to try and stand up and be the agent, when he tried to suppress every single vote in this state. He is the secretary of suppression, make no doubt about it.”

Husted, a Republican, did indeed file an appeal with the high court when he was ordered to open up the polls on the weekend before Election Day.

After the Supreme Court refused to take his case, Husted ordered election officials not to fill out a section on provisional ballots confirming what kind of identification voters provided, a move that led to an emergency lawsuit against his administration.

Now Husted has proposed a plan at his post election presser where he has an idea that would make Ohio 'less important' in the election.

Today, at the Impact Ohio conference, Jon Husted said something incredibly newsworthy that we haven’t seen reported anywhere.

Defending his performance managing Ohio’s election, Husted argued that because of the high stakes involved with being an electoral vote-rich swing state, Ohio’s elections chief is always scrutinized and criticized. (Funny, we don’t remember that happening in 2008, but that’s beside the point).

Husted’s solution to this perceived problem of Democrats and the national media picking on him? He says we should make Ohio less important in the election by dividing up our electoral votes by Congressional district.

This is huge and should raise giant red flags. Under the current winner-take-all system, Obama won all 18 of Ohio’s electoral votes. Under Husted’s plan, 12 of those 18 electoral votes would be handed to Mitt Romney, the popular vote loser.

The reason for this is Ohio's ridiculously gerrymandered districts to favor Republicans.

Dave Weigel at Slate explains what a bad idea this would be.

I can't overstate how disastrous this would be. Instead of a small chance of a popular vote/electoral vote split, you'd have, every four years, multiple chances for a majority of voters to support one candidate, but partisan gerrymanders handing the election to the loser. It would slant the election away from urban areas and give disproportionate powers to rural areas. You couldn't come up with a more tenacious assault on one-man-one-vote. Don't do it, people.
As it turned out President Obama's electoral strategy worked, his Midwest firewall held and he swept all but NC of the swing states. But Ohio was a must win for Romney and this could have given him a path to success.

Husted tried everything he possibly could to give Ohio to Romey, just like Jeb to GWB in 2000, and his continued persistence illustrates their determination, since they can't win with votes,  to win by any other means possible.

Welcome to the GOP playbook. If you can't win fair and square, change the rules.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site