Skip to main content

Mitt Romney and Richard Mourdock campaigning together.
Just a couple of the people American Crossroads is blaming for its poor return on investment.
Continuing the schadenfreudeliciousness of the week, Karl Rove's American Crossroads is trying to insist that donors aren't super pissed about Rove's failure in this election. (The donors are, in fact, super pissed.) According to Jonathan Collegio, an American Crossroads spokesman:
"On the Senate side, we did—and I'll be the first person to admit—have some pretty big problems on the candidate-recruitment side," he said. "I would argue that over the last two election cycles, Republicans have probably lost at least six Senate seats—not because of any bad messaging coming from our party, but because we had some candidates that were outraised and that frankly were not ready for the platform that's a Republican Senate candidate, where there's an enormous amount of scrutiny."
Oh, the candidate recruitment. Otherwise known as "terrible candidates like Todd Akin, Richard Mourdock, Christine O'Donnell, and Sharron Angle keep winning Republican primaries." Those are the candidates your party's voters are choosing, dude. It's true that American Crossroads is not directly casting those votes, but that's the Republican Party in which it's a driving force.
"So instead of talking about our message of cutting the debt and taxes, we ended up on a lot of tangential issues that should never have been debated, because we had some very, very weak candidates."
Tangential issues like absolute opposition to abortion under any circumstances, which is in the 2012 Republican platform? Or attempts to redefine rape to only count if it's "forcible," which House Republicans, including your party's vice-presidential nominee, keep trying to vote into law? But of course the issue isn't that Akin and Mourdock hold the positions they do, it's that they admitted it. Less weak candidates, in the American Crossroads worldview, would have the same position on rape and abortion as Akin and Mourdock, they just wouldn't say say so where voters might notice.

So Karl Rove's failures are in part the fault of Republican primary voters who picked candidates who espoused Republican policies even on issues that would offend general election voters. Also, too, it's Mitt Romney's fault for running such a lousy campaign, according to Collegio:

"The critical thing that gets lost with all of this analysis, is the president did a very, very good job raising a lot of money; he outspent Mitt Romney on television by $154 million over the campaign," he said. "And even that is understated by the fact that Mitt Romney was buying all of his ad time late, which meant that he was paying higher prices. The Crossroads groups and a lot of the outside groups that were spending money were really balancing out a really good and well-executed campaign by the president, but one where the Democrats had a really big financial advantage. Not only at the presidential level, but at the Senate level."
Looks like it's the Romney campaign's turn to point the finger back at American Crossroads, while the billionaire donors continue to be furious and disgusted with both Romney and Rove.

Originally posted to Laura Clawson on Fri Nov 09, 2012 at 11:24 AM PST.

Also republished by Sluts and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site