Skip to main content

I saw this brief story at Talking Points Memo that made me wonder about the Republican comeback and what that might look like.

The story read as follows: "Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), the highest ranked House Republican woman, said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union":

"I don't think it's about the Republican Party needing to become more moderate; I really believe it's the Republican Party becoming more modern," she said. "And whether it's Hispanics, whether it's women, whether it's young people, the Republican Party has to make it a priority to take our values, to take our vision to every corner of this country."

"I think it's more about the messenger and who's communicating our values to every corner of this country."

Such an interesting statement so soon after a significant defeat, but one that is to be expected. Should Republicans dare to go the moderate route and risk being laughed right out of town? Of course not. You can't go from hating everyone who is non-white and male, applauding the idea of someone without healthcare dying, and talk about rape as being God's plan to all of a sudden supporting gay marriage, caring about poor people, offering amnesty for Mexicans and respecting a vagina. It is just not believable.

No, something else has to be done to woo these same demographics into the Republican fold. It is absolutely necessary for the GOP's survival, but it won't be easy.

What Republicans need to do, and what I expect they will do in the coming months, is to lay off the gays, immigration, vaginas and poor people and instead focus solely on the economy and the size of government. These are steady, benign, non-racially charged issues that poll well with all kinds of people. Had Republicans truly stuck to this meme and not strayed into rape talk and bashing 47% of the country they may have actually pulled it off.

As a result of their huge loss though, Republicans now have to lay low. They need to go to the mattresses on the hot button issues that were soundly defeated this time around.

However, Republicans know that they still have the economy on their side. Nearly sixty million people voted for Romney to "fix" the economy. That issue has not gone away. I do not believe Obama was re-elected on the economy alone and do not believe the President was given a mandate on that issue. He actually still has a lot to prove to those red states and to those states where the vote was really close.

The reality is, Republicans did not lose on the economy. They lost on the crazy, and in keeping with Rep. Rogers statement Republicans do not know how to be anything else. They have turned crazy into an art form and have worked too hard and too long to just give it up.

Nevertheless, as with any loss there is some sucking up to do in the short term while they save face and plan for a comeback. To get those people who moved away from them this year, Republican's may have to, as Bill O'Reilly so eloquently put it, give them stuff in the short term; gay marriage, legal pot, amnesty, abortions, school loans, higher taxes for rich people, leaving Big Bird alone. This will be bad medicine going down, but once they get past the foul taste they may find that the same people who would never vote (R) might see a party willing to ease up on social issues and truly work on what they are experts in: ruining the economy and starting wars. In terms of those two areas, crazy wins every time.

Of course this is not going to happen in the short term. The recent crop of Republicans who were ousted in 2012 is a testament to that. But then Rep. Rodgers ended her comment with what could be the most telling aspect of this whole thing:

"I think it's more about the messenger and who's communicating our values to every corner of this country."
She may be right. Rest assured, one day some actor or evangelist or smooth talking, charismatic personality will arise once more to take back the party. It is inevitable. Once that happens, then everything I said is out the window. Let's face it, the only reason Romney won the first debate was because Obama didn't show. However, put Obama up against a Ronald Reagan or a plain talking simpleton like George W. and things may not go so well for Dems next time.

Remember, if this was really about voting for a liberal agenda then Al Gore and/or John Kerry would have defeated an obvious failure like Bush. But it was not to be. Remember too that Obama will not be running next time. Put someone like Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton up against a thinner Chris Christie or a good looking Scott Brown type with a pickup truck and things may look a whole lot different in 2016.

For now, assume terrorist looking Muslims will remain easy targets while Mexicans, gays and vaginas will become a little less threatening. But if someone comes along who makes those nearly sixty million feel inspired once more then look for the scales to tip back into the Republican's favor. When that happens look too for the crazy return in full force.

Anytime you doubt this just remember "freedom fries." That happened and will happen again. That's a promise.

Read more blog posts here and at


Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  We need to absolutely humiliate the Republicans (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Laugh at them, Make fun of their extreme stances on things, these people need to be shamed for their ridiculous beliefs.

  •  You are right... (0+ / 0-)

    ...that these are dangerous people who will desperately try anything rather than just become decent human beings.  The main difference between Republicans and Darth Vader is that Darth Vader turned good before he died.

    Making fun of them is certainly appropriate, but always watch for their bite.

    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power -- Benito Mussolini

    by drcraigphd on Tue Nov 13, 2012 at 08:04:19 AM PST

  •  I think we're deeply into a phase (0+ / 0-)

    where one side wins the presidential election and the other side wins the off-year election. When Democrats win the presidency they suffer two years later because of the inevitable plunge in turnout. Hope I'm wrong but election night 2014 probably won't be that festive.

  •  It is all packaging with them (3+ / 0-)

    Republicans are still convinced that if they put enough frosting on a brick, they can get the American voter to eat it.  It is just a matter of picking the right frosting.  This time around they were reckless enough to let us see the brick, but they won't want to do it again.

    Expect to see a lot of Marco Rubio and prominent Republical women over the next two years.  Frosting.

    Bene Scriptum, Bene Intellectum.

    by T C Gibian on Tue Nov 13, 2012 at 08:27:31 AM PST

    •  uh huh Cathy (0+ / 0-)

      "I don't think it's about the Republican Party needing to become more moderate; I really believe it's the Republican Party becoming more modern," she said.

      It's not what Aiken and Mourdock said about rape, it's that their haircuts weren't modern enough and that Tina Fey was able to call them two dollar haircuts.

      "And whether it's Hispanics, whether it's women, whether it's young people, the Republican Party has to make it a priority to take our values, to take our vision to every corner of this country."

      Yes, the Republican party clearly lost this year because it just didn't get that darn message out enough with its tiny advertising budget.

  •  About half the country voted for Romney. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ahumbleopinion, A Runner

    They aren't all crazy. There are plenty of sober, reasonable, conservative people out there. We have been gloating about the seven crazies who have run for senator the last two cycles and lost sure Republican seats. But remember that there were seven sane candidates who lost in the primaries and probably would have won the general election.

    The Republicans' immediate problem is that their party has been hijacked by the nuts, who get all the publicity and much of the money. The establishment will figure out how get control back eventually. They also have a long term demographic problem, but I expect that they will figure out how to deal with that also.

  •  They're not coming back (0+ / 0-)

    They will try terribly hard but, as a brand, they're finished! Most people are just tired of them and their bullshit now. They could possibly attempt to re-brand themselves as more moderate  but that could be successful only after the current GOP/Tea Party ship of fools has sailed off into oblivion and an entirely new batch of fresh faces take over.

  •  Absolutely correct Rep. Rodgers. (0+ / 0-)

    While the media is obsessed with the gop self-reflection meme, the gop will be busy working to find ever increasingly effective ways to use the billions of donor dollars that will continue to flow to the gop.

    No, the next election will not be about demographics. It will be about the gop modernizing its campaign with improved GOTV efforts, better internal communications, more effective data gathering, etc.

    They will be back and will not have changed one iota.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site