Skip to main content

U.S. Republican Senators John McCain (L) and Lindsey Graham talk during the Fiscal Responsibility Summit at the White House in Washington February 23, 2009.       REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque   (UNITED STATES)
John McCain releases a statement on reports that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence removed references to Al-Qaeda from the talking points Susan Rice used for her Sunday show appearances:
I am somewhat surprised and frustrated to read reports that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence was responsible for removing references to Al-Qaeda from the unclassified talking points about the Benghazi attack that Ambassador Susan Rice and other officials used in the early days after September 11, 2012. I participated in hours of hearings in the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last week regarding the events in Benghazi, where senior intelligence officials were asked this very question, and all of them – including the Director of National Intelligence himself – told us that they did not know who made the changes. Now we have to read the answers to our questions in the media. There are many other questions that remain unanswered. But this latest episode is another reason why many of us are so frustrated with, and suspicious of, the actions of this Administration when it comes to the Benghazi attack.
First, note that McCain is no longer complaining about Susan Rice—instead he's complaining about why Al-Qaeda wasn't included in the talking points she received. McCain will never admit it, but whether he intended it or not, with this statement he's basically accepting the fact that Susan Rice accurately conveyed the information given to her by intelligence agencies. So in that sense, score one for Susan Rice.

Second, don't forget that the issue here isn't whether or not Rice (and her talking points) acknowledged that extremists carried out the attacks—it's whether she (or they) knowingly withheld information that Al-Qaeda specifically was behind the attack. As I already mentioned, the logic of McCain's statement lets Rice off the hook—McCain is accepting that the briefing she was given did not identify Al Qaeda as the perpetrator of the attack.

McCain, however, will never acknowledge that even by his own standards, Susan Rice did nothing wrong. So let's not forget that despite McCain's rhetoric, Rice clearly and unambiguously said that extremists were central to the attack—and said that Al Qaeda may have played a key role.

I think it’s clear that there were extremist elements that joined in and escalated the violence. Whether they were al Qaeda affiliates, whether they were Libyan-based extremists or al Qaeda itself I think is one of the things we’ll have to determine.
Probably the best thing you can say about McCain's attacks on Rice and her talking points is that they are just plain dumb. In fact, the only thing about them that makes any sense to me is that they create an issue that McCain's buddy Lindsey Graham can use back home in South Carolina when he gets challenged in the 2014 U.S. Senate primary. And maybe it'll work. One thing we know about GOP primaries is this: stupid sells.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site