Skip to main content

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

      •  being reminded that your food was once alive (8+ / 0-)

        and being reminded that in order to become food it had to be slaughtered.... well, some folks just have major issues dealing with this reality.   It is I believe, the reason behind the irrational hatred that many people show towards vegetarians.

        •  No... (4+ / 0-)

          we're just put off by the anthropomorphization of our food and the comparison of animal slaughter to the death penalty.

          Turkeys, like fetuses, aren't people.

          "Let’s just move on, treat everybody with firmness, fairness, dignity, compassion and respect. Let’s be Marines." - Sgt. Maj Michael Barrett on DADT repeal

          by kyril on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:10:17 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  OK, I can accept that (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          shaharazade, Dutch Doctor

          Although I don't think that it explains the "irrational hatred towards vegetarians".  Then again, as a confirmed omnivore, I never understood that hatred; if eating meat seems like a bad idea to you, whether for moral, environmental, or purely health reasons, it doesn't seem like it takes any privileges away from me.

        •  Or the irrational hatred that vegetarians show (3+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          qofdisks, kyril, Sylv

          toward meat eaters.

          I'm sick of the arrogance on both sides.

          I eat very little meat now, and am limited now to mostly salmon, because I think fish has enormous benefits for health and longevity. If more vegetarians and vegans showed more patience, people would slowly come around. I heard a report tonight that google said that interest in a vegan meal went up 35% this year! That's good, I think. And more really healthy types like baskeball players are coming out as vegans, which are modeling the behavior, instead of lecturing meat-eaters from on a thousand-mile-high-horse.

          I used to be an enormous meat-eater, but gradually got off of all beef, all pork, and am down to very little poultry. If the meat industry depended on guys like me, it'd collapse overnight, which would be fine with me. For one thing, the cattle and swine industry virtually wreck this planet. I came at less meat eating from an environmental/health pespective first. Then I came to have sympathy for all the wholesale sacrifice of animals going on.

          But patience, for chrissakes! Animal eating and fishing has been going on for hundreds of centuries.

          "There's a lot to be said for making people laugh. Did you know that that's all some people have? It isn't much, but it's better than nothing in this cockeyed caravan." --Joel McCrea as "Sully," in "Sullivan's Travels."

          by Wildthumb on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 09:11:48 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  People hate vegetarians? (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          kyril

          Or just preachy self-righteous types?

          LG: You know what? You got spunk. MR: Well, Yes... LG: I hate spunk!

          by dinotrac on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 04:22:49 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

    •  Well, you have to understand that as a rule (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      kyril

      vegetarians are very self-righteous and have the compulsion to let everybody know how morally inferior they are if they eat meat. After all, animals were only being turned into food for half a billion years before man even appeared on the planet.

      If there is no accountability for those who authorized torture, we can no longer say that we are a nation of laws, not men.

      by MikePhoenix on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 09:05:41 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  That's more than a little bit unfair. (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Sylv, MikePhoenix

        What's probably more accurate is that the preachy ones are more noticeable and more annoying.

        It's surprising how many vegetarians are actually out there -- not eating any meat, but not pointing it out to you, either.

        LG: You know what? You got spunk. MR: Well, Yes... LG: I hate spunk!

        by dinotrac on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 04:26:50 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  I'm not a vegetarian, (8+ / 0-)

    but I empathize with those who are.  I'm not entirely sure that it is ethical or moral to eat animals, even though at present, I do.  Just my two cents.

    -4.75, -5.33 Cheney 10/05/04: "I have not suggested there is a connection between Iraq and 9/11."

    by sunbro on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 07:38:52 PM PST

  •  Though I admit some guilt that something must die (9+ / 0-)

    in order that I may eat, I take some solace that the bird on my table tomorrow had a pretty good life in my yard until its time came.  He had more space to roam than he and his flockmates  could fully explore, and his only confinement at night was for his own safety.  

    Sorry tom, really, but I hope you're delicious.

    "It is not, you fucking liberal prick." ..My RW friend Dave's last words to me.

    by rb608 on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 07:41:24 PM PST

    •  Way to go. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      kyril, rb608

      I have chickens.  I captured them in the neighborhood.  I ended up with 20 roosters.  My and my partner, RIP, killed 18 1st year roosters and made organic stock and a whole bunch of meat for winter dog stew.
      The birds had been eating weeds and bugs and the fat was deep yellow.  Excellent.  

  •  Ya Gonna Shoot Rudolph for Xmas? (6+ / 0-)

    Readers & Book Lovers Pull up a chair! You're never too old to be a Meta Groupie

    by Limelite on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 07:46:06 PM PST

  •  Does the turkey resemble Keith somehow? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JeffW, rb608

    Is this the cartoonists parable involving his persona in the turkey?

  •  Thank you for this. (14+ / 0-)

    I've been a vegetarian for over 14 years and Thanksgiving is tough.  It is surprising to me, in this progressive community, that animal welfare isn't more prominent.

    Yes, I realize there are a whole lot of human welfare issues that have to be resolved, but I wish do wish critter rights had more of a voice here.

    •  Were animals (0+ / 0-)

      all of us. Yet we mock those who think that maybe factory mass killing of animals for meat might just be not only inhumane but environmentally insane, not to mention unhealthy. Come on I'm having a organic chicken tonight for dinner and using the leftovers to make enchiladas for the few meat eaters among my guests at Thanksgiving.

      Half the people coming for dinner on tomorrow  are either vegans or vegetarians . Eat your meat, beat your meat but why get nasty about people who have enough sense to realize where and how we get our meat and more importantly what the factory production of meat is doing to the planet. Enjoy but please do not give those who are trying to adapt to a small planet a hard time.  

      •  I don't believe in the least (0+ / 0-)

        that my post was "nasty" to those who do eat meat - I made a fairly mild comment in reference to the cartoon above and stated that I wished this site was a little more critter oriented.  If you choose to eat meat, that's your choice. It's just not mine.

  •  I still don't know why he did it, but he did (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    rb608, Thinking Fella, NonnyO, dinotrac

    .... cross the road.


  •  Let's see, I consume oxygen and convert it to CO2 (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    rb608, Eikyu Saha, Amber6541

    Yep, I'm an animal.

    "But the problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence." - President Clinton

    by anonevent on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:06:40 PM PST

    •  Plants do that at night (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Eikyu Saha, kyril

      So I don't see how that proves you're not a plant.  Perhaps you're a fir tree that can type?

      •  (Nearly all) plants convert CO2 (and water) to (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Amber6541

        oxygen and sugar.

        LG: You know what? You got spunk. MR: Well, Yes... LG: I hate spunk!

        by dinotrac on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 04:31:17 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Sorry for being pedantic (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          dinotrac

          but this is such a common misconception among biology students that I can't resist.

          Plants do both.  Their cells oxidize organic molecules to generate ATP (i.e. useable energy) and give off CO2 as a waste product while consuming O2.  Cellular respiration just like animals.

          Plants also perform photosynthesis which is essentially the same process in reverse.  Overall they do more photosynthesis than respiration (hence plants grow and reproduce) but they definitely do both processes.

          As demimondian points out plants are net consumers of O2 and producers of O2 at night.

          "We are normal and we want our freedom" - Bonzos

          by matching mole on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 07:22:36 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

  •  I'm Not a Turkey (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    rb608, Pandora

    If "you are what you eat", then one thing's for certain: I'm no turkey!

    (I guess that makes me a Tofurky or an Apple or something.)

    •  Victor Buono (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Liberal Thinking

      The Fat Man's Prayer

      Lord, my soul is ripped with riot,
      Incited by my wicked diet.
      We are what we eat, said a wise old man,
      And Lord, if that's true, I'm a garbage can!
      I want to rise on Judgment Day, that's plain,
      But at my present weight, I'll need a crane!

      So grant me strength that I may not fall
      Into the clutches of cholesterol.
      May my flesh with carrot curls be sated
      That my soul may be polyunsaturated.
      And show me the light that I may bear witness
      To the President's Council on Physical Fitness.

      At oleomargarine I'll never mutter,
      For the road to hell is spread with butter.
      And cake is cursed, and cream is awful,
      And Satan is hiding in every waffle.
      Mephistopheles lurks in provolone,
      The devil is in each slice of bologna,
      Beelzebub is a chocolate drop,
      And Lucifer is a lollipop!

      Give me this day my daily slice -
      But cut it thin and toast it twice.
      I beg upon my dimpled knees,
      Deliver me from Jujubees.
      And my when days of trial are done
      And my war with malted milks is won,
      Let me stand with the saints in heaven
      In a shining robe - Size 37!

      I can do it, Lord, if you'll show to me
      The virtues of lettuce and celery.
      If you'll teach me the evils of mayonnaise,
      The sinfulness of hollandaise
      And pasta a la milanese
      And potatoes a la lyonaise
      And crisp fried chicken from the south!
      Lord, if you love me, SHUT MY MOUTH!

      "The scientific nature of the ordinary man is to go on out and do the best you can." John Prine

      by high uintas on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 09:05:00 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Good cartoon. (5+ / 0-)

    Something meat eaters should consider: What exactly gives you the right to take the meat of other animals?  Just because you can?  It's one thing when it's a question of survival, as it is for so many in the world, but when it's just a lifestyle choice is that really acceptable?

    "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

    by Troubadour on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:11:56 PM PST

    •  Let me ask a complementary question. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      evilstorm, kyril

      Why is there a moral issue at all?  I'm listening -- but, despite many years of paying very close attention, I've never heard an evidence-based argument for any food animal having moral standing, except in the crudest sense, and I've seen a lot of evidence that they don't.  (You might make a case for whale, although having even looked at that evidence, I think it's thinner than most advocates believe.  Either way, whale is not a part of the US diet.)

      •  How about the ethics of consuming .... (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        demimondian

        ...saturated animal fats and the adverse effects of that?

      •  You have to draw the line somewhere (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        demimondian

        and based on neurological evidence, I'm of the view that the line belongs at vertebrates.

        "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

        by Troubadour on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:33:26 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Based on neurobiological evidence (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          kyril

          I would suggest that the line is someplace where there's significant contribution of prefrontal cortex and thalamocortical communication.  After all, a 12 week fetus has a functional spinal cord.

          •  I wouldn't eat a fetus either. (0+ / 0-)

            "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

            by Troubadour on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:47:12 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  Is your objection to eating the flesh (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              kyril

              or to killing it?  It seems to me that you're concerned about that actual consumption -- I truly don't see a moral issue in that.

              •  I'm being facetious. (0+ / 0-)

                Abortion is not the same issue.  A fetus is not an independent organism, but an outgrowth of the mother, and the mother's right to autonomy is supreme.  Also, a fetus is not as sentient as even a fish - its brain has no need to be aware of itself or its environment: It's just a biological "construction site."

                "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

                by Troubadour on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 09:09:48 PM PST

                [ Parent ]

                •  On the other hand, a cow.. (1+ / 0-)
                  Recommended by:
                  kyril

                  will never be self-aware; the thalamocortical circuits are not there, and neither is the mass of the frontal cortex.

                  So it's not a facile question at all, but a serious one.  

                  •  I don't mean intellectually self-aware (0+ / 0-)

                    as in having a concept of self - I mean it feels and perceives its environment, and has emotions.  A cow is sentient.  A fetus is not.

                    "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

                    by Troubadour on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 09:14:24 PM PST

                    [ Parent ]

                    •  I suggest that there's a deeper difference (1+ / 0-)
                      Recommended by:
                      kyril

                      Some animals have a qualitatively different experience of "self" than others.  Cows can feel pain, yes, but they cannot anticipate it (as far as I know, they don't even exhibit learned helplessness, something which even dogs exhibit.)  That's a significant difference, and it carries moral weight to me.

                      As a result, I don't buy the core moral argument against eating meat.  I can accept the utilitarian ones (it's bad for you to eat meat because of the health consequences) or the humanitarian ones (animal husbandry is wasteful at best, and factory farming goes beyond that to outright cruelty), but I don't believe the moral arguments have much merit.

                      •  So if a human were brain damaged (0+ / 0-)

                        in such a way that they could still move around, eat, and respond to stimuli, but could no longer anticipate pain or show cognizance of self in the standard tests, it would be acceptable to shoot them and eat their corpse?

                        "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

                        by Troubadour on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 09:41:53 PM PST

                        [ Parent ]

                    •  gotta say (1+ / 0-)
                      Recommended by:
                      kyril

                      A fetus responds to its environment, albeit in very basic ways, like "enough oxygen/not enough oxygen". It kicks when the mother drinks something cold; it stops moving when it's ill. Everything perceives its environment in some way. Emotions I don't know about, but then I've never seen evidence of fish having emotions, either.

        •  Have you ever danced with a squid? (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          animal mother

          I have.  Squids are enormously intelligent creatures, as I found out when one came up to me (when I was snorkeling off Japan) and lampooned by snorkel goggles by positioning himself right in front of my face and then lifting his arms up into the shape of my lens rims while looking right at me and holding that position for well over ten seconds.  I wasn't able to ask his/her views on mortality, but it was an astounding experience nonetheless.  

      •  Is that a serious question? (0+ / 0-)

        Because they suffer, and we have a choice not to participate in that suffering. Justify it all you want, but the moral question is no more complicated than that.

        •  Actually, yes (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          kyril

          And, no, that's not an answer.  You're asking about our moral duties, not an animal's moral standing.  The original question was "What gives you the right..."; my response is "What evidence is that that I need anything to give me that right?"  Saying "They suffer" does not answer that question.

          •  You're evading the basic truth (0+ / 0-)

            that non-human animals suffer by your participation in killing them with a strained argument about "moral standing," which as far as I can tell is an intellectual fabrication that serves to justify your preference for eating animals, but has no basis in reality. As I stated previously, justify all you want. And by all means, get creative.

    •  What gives you the right (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Eikyu Saha, ontheleftcoast

      to kill and eat plants?

      Sounds like a silly question, doesn't it? You probably don't consider plants particularly morally-relevant. They're relevant enough that you probably wouldn't want to cause extinctions of entire species, and there are some individual plants (probably mostly things like old growth trees) that you wouldn't want to kill, but most individual food plants aren't terribly important in a moral sense.

      In other words, you don't believe that all living things have equal moral relevance - you view it as a spectrum, and you draw a particular line below which it's permissible to kill things for food.

      Meat-eaters just draw that line in a different place.

      "Let’s just move on, treat everybody with firmness, fairness, dignity, compassion and respect. Let’s be Marines." - Sgt. Maj Michael Barrett on DADT repeal

      by kyril on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:27:07 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I have to eat something to live. (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Pandora

        For people with no viable alternative options, being carnivorous is ethically acceptable.  For those that do, it's not.  Living things with vertebrate nervous systems have many of the same perceptual / emotional systems as we do, even if it's less complex - you wouldn't say it's okay to kill a human with brain damage that leaves them in the behavioral state of an animal, would you?  Plants don't have these systems.    

        "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

        by Troubadour on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:37:35 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Plants have other systems (0+ / 0-)

          which serve much the same purpose.

          "Let’s just move on, treat everybody with firmness, fairness, dignity, compassion and respect. Let’s be Marines." - Sgt. Maj Michael Barrett on DADT repeal

          by kyril on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:54:10 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  No they don't. (0+ / 0-)

            I have a comprehensive biology textbook on my shelf that weighs more than my computer describing every facet of plant biology that a non-professional could possibly understand, and there's nothing remotely analogous to the vertebrate nervous system among plants.  But, of course, I would defer to any biologist who says otherwise since I'm a layman.

            But even ignoring that for the moment, once again, humans have to eat to live and be healthy.  So it's acceptable for people who have no viable alternatives to eat meat; and it's acceptable for me to eat plants, since that is the morally best option (not to mention ecologically best option).

            "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

            by Troubadour on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 11:21:42 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  You've backed yourself into a corner (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              kyril

              You don't have to consume any living thing to survive. You could eat the excretions, they create -- say milk or honey or syrup. You could "farm" bacteria like E. coli to produce amino acids and other compounds. If you really wanted to do it you could eat food that required nothing, not plant nor animal, would die. Face it, we kill plants because it's convenient. But technology is probably going to save our bacon (and quite literally). We're going to have to start growing food outside of the traditional sense. In sci-fi there are concepts of things called "cornucopic vats". Basically you pump in raw materials, C - H - O - N and energy (and some trace elements) and out comes food. It'll be like tofu only with less flavor. With billions of mouths to feed and global warming playing havoc on the food chain it's going to be dining from vats or starving in less than a century. Then nobody will be a carnivore or even a herbivore. Well all be tofuvores.

              To me progress is not so much a goal as it is a process and I believe it will not follow a straight course. Remember, the drops of water that form the river may not take the shortest path but they will still reach the ocean.

              by ontheleftcoast on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 12:54:46 AM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  I'm unaware of any viable alternative (0+ / 0-)

                to eating plants and their products.  Viable alternative - i.e., one that doesn't take more energy away from me in the execution of a complex program than it provides in nutrition.  I fully believe science will some day construct food molecule by molecule, and not require the death of anything more advanced than rocks, but that day is not yet here.

                "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

                by Troubadour on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 01:01:01 AM PST

                [ Parent ]

        •  Actually, it would depend (0+ / 0-)

          I might, depending on the previously expressed wishes of the person in question.  There's the question -- I suggest that you're ignoring the ability to foresee consequences, and even to recognize "self" that all food animals lack -- that ability is limited to some chimpanzees, dolphins, some whales, and, of course, humans.

          •  The past doesn't own the future. (0+ / 0-)

            If someone expresses a wish that someone should kill them if they ever leave their church, that doesn't mean it should be done if that event happens.  Vegetative states are one thing - in that case, the closest thing to sentient will is their past expressions - but animal states are just will devoid of logic, and logic is not a requirement for rights (otherwise little children wouldn't have any).

            "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

            by Troubadour on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 11:26:20 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

  •  Butternut squash lasagna for Thanksgiving (5+ / 0-)

    That's what I'll be having tomorrow.  No turkeys involved (and it's delicious).

    http://www.foodnetwork.com/...

    I left my heart in NAZ.

    by Scott in NAZ on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:16:07 PM PST

  •  It's more than that they are killed (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Pandora, Dutch Doctor, Amber6541

    That, you could make a case for or against.

    However, you cannot make a case for the factory farm...

    An eye for an eye and the whole world will be blind.

    by rini6 on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:30:55 PM PST

  •  First we kill the animals (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Pandora

    William Roberts M.D., editor of a journal for cardiologists, said something along these lines:

    First we kill the animals to eat them, and then they kill us.

  •  There is no Pacifier for Nature. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Wildthumb, evilstorm, kyril

    The total amount of suffering per year in the natural world is beyond all decent contemplation. During the minute that it takes me to compose this sentence, thousands of animals are being eaten alive, many others are running for their lives, whimpering with fear, others are slowly being devoured from within by rasping parasites, thousands of all kinds are dying of starvation, thirst, and disease. It must be so.-Richard Dawkins

    •  That's what always astounds me. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      NJS, kyril

      The entire animal world on one gigantic eating frenzy to stay alive. It's nature, and it's built-in. And animals feel no sympathy for the eaten. Even less so when you move down the chain. Can you imagine insect empathy? I don't think so.

      Jane Goddall, someone I admire greatly, thought the chimpanzee a superior animal till she saw them warring on other chimp tribes and actually killing chimp babies. She was actually disgusted and disappointed in them for awhile.

      But as my mother used to say, "they don't know any better."

      "There's a lot to be said for making people laugh. Did you know that that's all some people have? It isn't much, but it's better than nothing in this cockeyed caravan." --Joel McCrea as "Sully," in "Sullivan's Travels."

      by Wildthumb on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 09:17:01 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  not really relevant (0+ / 0-)

        Honestly, to the extent that this is a moral question, the moral burden is one we, and we alone, bear.  They may not know better; the question is "should we?"  That's not an easy question.

        •  "Not really relevant." I (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          NJS, jgumby

          fucking LOVE your arrogance.

          This is why people like you blow potential allies like me away.
          You are fucking clueless, aren't you? I'll bet you're a joy to be around with your holier-than-thou bullshit.

          "There's a lot to be said for making people laugh. Did you know that that's all some people have? It isn't much, but it's better than nothing in this cockeyed caravan." --Joel McCrea as "Sully," in "Sullivan's Travels."

          by Wildthumb on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 09:38:52 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

  •  I thought in order to be a cartoonist that (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    animal mother

    you needed to know how to draw.

    If there is no accountability for those who authorized torture, we can no longer say that we are a nation of laws, not men.

    by MikePhoenix on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:59:27 PM PST

  •  omnivore here (0+ / 0-)

    Made me smile and YES we are animals

    I at times kill my own meat, I feel no guilt, turkeys, chickens, cows, etc. are not people, neither are fish. Come on guys it's a cartoon it's designed to make you think,

    The rule of law is what stands between all of us and the arbitrary exercise of power by the state.

    by babatunde on Wed Nov 21, 2012 at 08:59:27 PM PST

  •  I will never forget that interview of Sarah Palin (0+ / 0-)

    with the killing cones stuffed with bleeding turkeys behind her.  Hilarious.  

  •  Ag myths (0+ / 0-)

    Hey urbanites.  Turkeys are not grown in cages nor are they given growth hormones.  Apparently even people who write cartoon satire don't have a clue how farms operate.
    They either need to educate themselves or stop commenting.  That's the choice.   This ignorance does give farmers like me a laugh though.  It is quite funny.

  •  Morals and arrogance (0+ / 0-)

    The morality of eating animals is complicated given human history contrasted with the progression of our ethics. Bending the arc towards food sources that are environmentally friendly, healthy, and which reduce suffering is a good thing. This cartoon is part of that conversation. If the arrogance of the argument bothers you then it says more about you then it does about them. An arrogant argument that the earth is 6000 years old does not make me angry. An arrogant argument that slavery is morally wrong strengthens not weakens it.

Click here for the mobile view of the site