Skip to main content

On the day before Thanksgiving, the New York Times ran an editorial called "A Broken Election System."  The last section had proposals for diluting the power of money in the political campaigns, but made the common assumption that only a constitutional amendment could overcome the effects of the Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United.  The Times may be right with respect to putting limits on contributions from wealthy individuals, but corporations and other business entities are creatures of state law and their behavior may be regulated other ways.  It is time for us to consider some more creative responses, outlined below.

Business companies adopt corporate form (whether as corporations, limited liability companies or limited partnerships) in order to allow investors to limit their liability to the amount of their investment in case things go wrong.  States used to impose a number of conditions on corporations in exchange for allowing this limitation of liability, but there has been a race to the bottom, led by Delaware and Nevada, to allow companies very wide latitude in what they may do and how they may organize themselves.  Today the purpose stated in a corporate charter can be "any lawful activity" and, since the Supreme Court has made it impossible for states to outlaw political activity by a corporation, there is no way to keep corporations from lobbying and investing in candidates for political office.  But states can and do still regulate certain corporate behavior.  Even Delaware has laws to protect minority shareholder from having their equity diluted by the majority.

The problem with corporate campaign spending and lobbying is the opposite.  Because wealth and economic power is so concentrated, a small minority is able to make political decisions for an economic entity in relative secrecy and without the consent of the majority of its owners, let alone the majority of other stakeholders, such as the employees.  If this minority is allowed to act without restriction, then political democracy itself is at risk.  But states are not powerless to protect themselves.  A state that wishes to safeguard its political process could enact a law stating that any expenditure by a business organized in or doing business in the state which seeks to influence the state's elections or its legislative process must be ratified by a majority of all shareholders or members, on a one-person-one-vote basis, or by a board member selected on the same basis.  A shareholder with 100,000 shares would have one vote, as would a shareholder with one share of stock.  And just as we don't allow voting by proxy in our political elections, voting by proxy could be prohibited for this purpose.  And shareholders other than natural persons could be subject to the same requirement with respect to the casting of their votes.    

We could go even further and, like many European countries, recognize that employees should have a say in certain corporate decisions.  The rationale for employee participation is particularly strong where the company is acting in the political sphere, which is supposed to be subject to the democratic principle of majority rule.

The result of this sort of democratic reform would be both transparency and a limitation of political spending to issues and candidates that a majority of a company's stakeholders supported.  Organizations such as labor unions or cooperatives whose boards are already elected democratically could continue to make political contributions.  And the distinction would lay bare the fundamental distinction between democratic organizations and anti-democratic organizations, restoring the true meaning of a "special interest" as economic interests not subject to the popular will.

Following this month's election there are at least thirteen states, including California, where Democrats control all three branches of government.  Now is the time for those states to strike a blow for democracy and consider some new ways to dilute the power of money in politics.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site