Skip to main content

Republican U.S. Presidential candidate Mitt Romney (L) introduces U.S. Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI) as his vice-presidential running mate during a campaign event at the retired battleship USS Wisconsin in Norfolk, Virginia, August 11, 2012.  REUTERS/Jason
Thinking they had a shot.
Harry Enten of the Guardian makes a funny point—the polls were skewed ... toward Mitt Romney!
It's fairly clear that no matter what method is utilized, the national polls were too favorable towards Romney. Only eight out of 113 polls (or 7.1%) during the final month had Obama's lead at above 3pt. Three of the eight were from the Rand Corporation, two were from Google, and the rest were scattered between Democracy Corps, IBD/TIPP, and the United Technologies/National Journal survey.

During the final week, only three out of 30 polls (or 10%) conducted had Obama's lead above 3pt. They belonged to Democracy Corps, Google, and Rand. If Obama's lead climbs to 3.5pt, then, even with rounding, the vast majority of national polls were off in the final week. (Note: usually one would consider a poll giving Obama's victory margin as 3pt to be right if the final result were between 2.50 and 3.49pt.)

The problem with these results were overly restrictive likely voter screens. For example, Gallup had President Barack Obama leading 49-46 among registered voters. Had they stopped there, they'd be sitting pretty with their results. Instead, they decided that brown people and young voters weren't going to turn out, and had Romney winning 49-48 among likely voters.

There was a consistent 2-4-point difference between registered and likely voter results in most state and national polling, the reason that I predicted a a 3.5-point Obama victory in the national popular vote. (Note, that link compares my predictions to outdated vote totals. My calls will look even better after all votes are counted.)

To be sure, the theory that core Democratic groups wouldn't vote as heavily as 2008 wasn't ludicrous. It is much harder to get our people to turn out, and the polling showed less base intensity this year compared to 2008. Still, early voting gave us an insight into actual voting behavior, and it was clear that we were either meeting or exceeding 2008 turnout. So if our people were voting early in droves in places like North Carolina, Iowa and Ohio, then pollsters who claimed otherwise had to be wrong.

That, and registered voter numbers have historically been more accurate. Past performance may not be a predictor of future results, but layer on top of that the early voting totals, and it was pretty cut and dried to me.

So yes, the polls were skewed toward Romney—but only because of overly restrictive likely voter screens. Had they all stuck with their registered voter results, they would've been golden.

p.s. Just look how crazy Gallup's LV screen is:

Gallup's likely-voter model is a battery of seven questions it uses to determine which respondents are most likely to cast ballots. These questions include how likely they say they are to vote, their self-reported vote history, whether they know where to vote, and how much thought they have given to the election.

Respondents are awarded points for their answers to these questions, and only those who accrue a significant number of points pass through the likely-voter screen.

Compare that to PPP's likely voter screen:
If you don't plan to vote in this fall's election, hang up now.

Originally posted to kos on Fri Nov 23, 2012 at 11:03 AM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site