Skip to main content

The Republican Party suffered a resounding defeat in November at the hands of the Democrats. As fate would have it, angry white men are not enough to win elections in America anymore. However this does not mean they've given up, nor does it mean politics have ceased. Many on the left, myself included, are still celebrating the election; there's no denying the significance of the victory, but the GOP is still kicking and its time to double down. In Mississippi, Republicans have found a way to remind the people that their state voted for Romney: they are attacking their only abortion clinic. In Michigan, Republicans in the legislature are working to pass right-to-work legislation to undermine the strength of unions. On the national stage, the GOP-controlled House is holding social programs hostage to protect tax cuts for the rich. While they are ultimately on their way out, Republicans are still of the mindset that they have a mandate to govern the way they want, and any election that says otherwise was a mistake. They are undeterred in their goal of wanting to see the federal government shrunk to a pre-New Deal Era size, which would make regulation of business and helping the poor impossible.

The Democrats have begun to take control of the frame of the national conversation, but they must act decisively and not back down if they are to solidify it. First thing on the agenda should be controlling the lame duck Congress. With the election still fresh, there should be a should push for redistricting reform. In 2006, a senator named Barack Obama said "too often, our representatives are selecting their voters, as opposed to the voters selecting the representatives. That is a situation that I think the American people should not accept." The 2012 election demonstrated just that: the majority of Americans voted to reject the GOP's radical agenda. Democrats won the majority of the votes cast for the House, but thanks to gerrymandering they were unable to take the election. Things have gotten so out of control that the House, with elections every two years, has a lower turnover rate than the Senate, with elections every six, opposite to how the Framers intended it. Democrats should seek a non-partisan committee to draw the districts as opposed to the state legislatures doing it every 10 years. Such reform would benefit our democratic process while simultaneously doing what an electoral rejection could not: weaken the GOP's oppositional spirit if not its hold on the national dialogue by threatening the last bastion of their power. This could be Obama's Court Packing Scheme. Only when the House falls in line can real progress be made.

The Democrats must also shift the focus from the deficit to real issues like banking/Wall Street reform, unemployment, and poverty. They have to take their case directly to the people the way FDR did when Republicans balked at the New Deal, and the people must be motivated enough to act.

We won the battle but the war is far from over. The Democrats can ensure a general trend of victory for the next 30 years by making the next four a success. However, all that has been achieved can be undone if the left is unable to deal with the problems facing America. Every legislative battle must be a victory because the GOP has nothing to lose, and even when they did, that didn't stop them. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called the debt ceiling "a hostage worth taking." The Republicans purposely downgraded the national credit rating in an effort to hurt President Obama's reelection chances. Now, the GOP can feel that the writing is on the wall, and so they're not really trying to fix the country. They're hoping the Democrats fail, and to that end are proposing bad policies: It is no secret companies ship jobs overseas because the labor is cheaper, but does that really mean we should bring sweatshops back to America? There are people who hate us in the world, but does that really mean we need to pay for military equipment we don't even use just for the sake of having it? Finance is an ever-evolving field but does that really mean we have to deregulate the banks and Wall Street to stay current, given that the last 2 times we did the economy collapsed? Religion can be an important part of people's lives, but does anything justify denying women's healthcare needs, fundamental human rights, and science? Moreover, does it really mean we should ignore our constitutional separation of church and state? Global warming is a difficult problem to address in an industrialized America, but does that mean we shouldn't even try? Nobody denies that the rich benefit the economy, but are we really communists for rejecting the notion that they're the backbone of it? Finally, in a time of recession, a time economists agree that spending is the answer, should we really be focused on cutting spending? It may sound like paranoia to accuse the GOP of playing dirty politics in an effort to sabotage the Democrats, but this is the party of the Southern Strategy and Divide & Conquer. This is the party that admitted to attempting to limit the minority vote this past election. We voted for change. Its time the people had their day in court, and for that the Democrats have to keep fighting.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Navy Vet Terp, Neon Vincent, mcgee85

    Walker Bragman BA Government from Skidmore College Political Cartoonist/Blogger

    by WalkerBragman on Sat Dec 01, 2012 at 06:20:20 PM PST

  •  The deficit is a real issue (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    VClib, Neuroptimalian

    As a member of the generation that's going to be paying the bill with interest, it really irks me when people say the deficit doesn't matter. I agree that it was necessary to run up a big deficit to get the economy going back in 2009 and that more stimulus might be necessary now, but it is a really big deal that we keep running up so much debt that our generation is going to have to pay off with interest.

    •  Raise taxes on the rich, create full employment (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      OooSillyMe

      and the deficit will take care of itself.  I am 62 year old and all my life the right has been whining about the deficit, except, of course, when they are in charge.  We ran deficits many many times what we have now in World War II.  The true cost of the deficit is interest on the debt, which has remained more than manageable.

      "We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals, now we know that it is bad economics." Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jan. 20, 1937

      by Navy Vet Terp on Sat Dec 01, 2012 at 06:34:12 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  But the deficit isn't a real issue (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Gooserock, OooSillyMe

      Trying to fix the deficit now is like taking out a splinter in the middle of being chased by zombies. Its an issue that you will eventually have to deal with, but first you have to find safety. You're right, eventually we will have to deal with the spending...maybe. More likely our economy will pick up with increased spending and we will begin paying off the deficit slowly, provided we increase revenues....(tax the rich, raise capital gains, and end subsidies to big companies.)

      Investor confidence is high. In fact, investors pay the government to hold onto their money. Interest rates are low as is inflation. We get more of a return on every dollar we borrow than we will have to pay back in the future.

      Right now there are far bigger issues facing us.

      I too am part of the generation that will be "paying it off", but its as you said: more stimulus is necessary. We really need public works programs.

      Walker Bragman BA Government from Skidmore College Political Cartoonist/Blogger

      by WalkerBragman on Sat Dec 01, 2012 at 06:43:42 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Just get the billionaires to pay it (0+ / 0-)

      Hell, that's the main reason it's so high to start with (Iraq war sure didn't help either).

      Why are you letting them stick you with the bill?  Don't you see what they're doing here?

      Republicans: Taking the country back ... to the 19th century

      by yet another liberal on Sat Dec 01, 2012 at 07:34:39 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Walker - we are going to make you repeat (3+ / 0-)

    PoliSci 101. Each state legislature is responsible for determining US Congressional districts. There are a few exceptions like California where an independent citizens commission determines the Congressional districts. The US House of Representatives plays no role whatsoever in drawing district boundaries, and even if they did, any Dem sponsored plan that Speaker Boehner doesn't like won't even come up for a vote during the next two years. The Dems have little leverage or influence in the House, with the GOP in the majority.

    "let's talk about that"

    by VClib on Sat Dec 01, 2012 at 06:49:21 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site