Skip to main content

I wrote a graduate economics thesis on the correlation between money and happiness, so I’m interested any time it’s announced that there is a big lottery winner, like last week’s. The jackpot of close to $600 million will be split between two winning tickets. The lottery makes a fascinating case study of financial psychology in terms of the money-happiness correlation, but before getting to that, a few notes on lottery-related research.

A 2010 paper published by Vanderbilt University, the University of Kentucky, and the University of Pittsburgh grouped lottery winners into “sizeable” winners who won between $50,000 and $150,000 and “modest” winners, with prizes of $10,000 or less. Looking at the winners 5 years after collecting their prize, the “sizeable” winners were more likely to have filed for bankruptcy.  Of further interest is the fact that 5 years post-win, there was almost no difference in terms of assets and debt between the sizeable and modest winners. For those interested in the specifics of the study, pre-lottery assets and debt were controlled for, such that the pre-winning financial situation was not the determining factor in the 5 year post-win results.

There’s no question that $150,000 is far different from $600 million, but anecdotally, many cases of “mega-winners” going bankrupt exist. A first layer analysis would suggest that since lottery players are heavily skewed towards low net worth individuals, it stands to reason that those most likely to win are people who, by definition, do not have a good track record of managing money well. However, looking at a second layer, we have to account for the psychological effects of winning such an enormous sum of money, and the lack of care and discretion that can develop in a winner who comes across what could and should be a multigenerational nest egg of money.

This takes us back to the money-happiness correlation. In surveys, most people predict that additional money would bring them additional happiness at just about every level of income, from poverty to the top 1%. A study done by Richard Easterlin of the University of Southern California showed that while in snapshot data, richer people within specific countries were happier than poorer people, and that richer countries were happier than poorer countries, over the long term, this did not hold true. Studies looking at actual money-happiness correlations across income levels within countries and in the aggregate comparing one country to another over time suggest something very different. My paper, based on information available through 2008, found that happiness does increase in direct proportion to money only up to the level of about U$D10,000, or its equivalent in the buying power it represents in any country’s local currency.

I admit that these numbers even surprised me, but as many times as I repeated the graphs and charts and ran the numbers with different sets of data, there was no significant correlation between money and happiness once the $10,000 level was passed. My expectation was that there would be a drop-off in the money-related happiness increase, but I expected it to be around the $45,000 or $55,000 level. I was wrong.

Clearly, the perception that more money will make one happier does not correlate with the data, but that shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone. While increases in income or assets can make people less displeased with their lives as related specifically to their level of income, it cannot really make up for other areas of life that may be lacking.

An additional area of interest came when looking at aggregate happiness levels from one country to another, and looking at some of the outliers. Venezuela is a country that often shows up at the top of the happiness indices while having a low GDP per capita. People who live in Venezuela may be able to shed light on why this is. In China, where GDP per capita has nearly doubled in a short period of time, happiness hasn’t increased at all. We could make a number of theories about the political and social factors that are holding happiness down in China, but that would be its own case study.

As the latest and other future lottery winners are revealed, remember the studies – while many people would expect that such a cash windfall would bring new levels of happiness and satisfaction, more and more people are becoming in tune with the reality – or lack of reality – in those expectations.  There’s no question that for the countless poor in the US and around the world, reaching a basic subsistence level would have a profound effect on their lives and satisfaction – however, for people living with most of the modern “luxuries” that we have today, the effect would be underwhelming.

David Pakman, host of the internationally syndicated political talk radio and television program, "The David Pakman Show," writes a monthly column. He can be reached at

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  My brother... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Onomastic, BlackSheep1

    ...Kossack dcnw, says that buying a lottery ticket is "buying a dream". Dreams aren't real, though, while life with (or without) a lottery win is. You probably have to chalk it all up to unreasonable expectations. Mine was the idea that I could retire sooner than I did, even though I did eventually retire early at roughly 70% of my salary, and have never won more than $100 in 28 years of playing.

    On another tack, I read an article last year on the NYT website that the best way to ensure a win is to buy at least 100,000 tickets! Imagine the logistics of just buying that number, without repeats of number sequences. And since I play the Lucky Day Lotto these days here in Illinois, which has a minimum grand prize jackpot of $100,000, that seems pointless. Oh, and just as an aside, you'd have to spend $200,000 on the Powerball, at $2/ticket.

    Ya takes yer cherce and ya pays year money!

    Float like a manhole cover, sting like a sash weight! Clean Coal Is A Clinker!

    by JeffW on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 07:02:23 AM PST

  •  The first big winner of the Arizona lottery (0+ / 0-)

    in the 1980's ended up murdering his best friends girlfriend.

    Seems that she was interfering with his friendship.

    If I remember correctly, first he raped her, then months later he killed her.

    He ended up on death row. Probably dead by now.

    Tried to google it, but story is so old it didn't show up.

    Maybe someone else can find a link.

    Notice: This Comment © 2012 ROGNM

    by ROGNM on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 07:13:45 AM PST

  •  $10,000 (0+ / 0-)

    After the very first state lottery in Pennsylvania, back in 1972, the owners of this little mom-and-pop grocery store near my childhood home wound up with a bunch of leftover tickets that hadn't sold, and apparently the way the rules were written at the time, they had to pay for those tickets.

    They were understandably upset about this, but then one of the tickets they were "stuck" with won $10,000. This amount made them feel rich enough to take early retirement. They sold the store and moved to a warmer climate. (Of course, this was in the early 1970s, when $10,000 seemed like a lot more money than it does today.) From what I heard from other locals who knew them, their story ended happily and they were doing well.

    Very interesting diary!

  •  It's a cheap ticket to Hope (0+ / 0-)

    It's fun to hold something in your hand that might (now there's a powerful word) change your life.

    I really think winning a massive amount of money would indeed make me happy -- but that's because I don't really judge my station by what I have, and get a real sense of satisfaction in finding ways to improve the world, and could be blissfully happy spending the rest of my life running my philanthropic foundation.

    Plus, given my tiny 401(k) and underwater mortgage, the lottery is more or less my retirement plan, and it would really make me happy to be able to retire some day...

    Great diary! Is the paper available on line anywhere?

    "Do it in the name of Heaven; you can justify it in the end..." - Dennis Lambert & Brian Potter

    by pragmaticidealist on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 10:55:33 AM PST

    •  what I want is about $7500 (0+ / 0-)

      which would fix all the stuff I can't afford to hire somebody to do and am really not qualified to undertake myself.

      But I'd want to win about, oh, $50K. That way I could do all the above, pay off some debts for some people I care about, and stick some money into savings.

      LBJ, Lady Bird, Anne Richards, Barbara Jordan, Sully Sullenberger, Ike, Drew Brees, Molly Ivins --Texas is no Bush league! -7.50,-5.59

      by BlackSheep1 on Wed Dec 05, 2012 at 12:29:49 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site