Skip to main content

This little special clip from the makers of the Simpsons has mean rich guy Montgomery Burns explaining 'The Fiscal Cliff' to the little people.

This is actually no worse than how the MSM has 'explained' the 'fiscal cliff' to the public. It turns out that 47% (there's that number, yet again!) of people who were asked about the fiscal cliff think that the deficit WILL INCREASE if we go over the fiscal cliff.

That's right. The combination of more taxes into the treasury and reduced spending that would result from 'going over the cliff' would result in an increased deficit, according to these folks. The MSM has succeeded in convincing the public that going over the cliff would terrible (of course, hence the name) and Republicans have succeeded in convincing America (thanks to that complicit media) that the deficit is a terrible, awful, horrible thing. Therefore, the logical conclusion is that the (horrible) fiscal cliff will result in a (horrible) deficit increasing result. Makes sense, right?

As if, the deficit doesn't normally go up all the time without dire warnings of a doomsday scenario preceeding it.

Photobucket

We wanted to gauge if people understood the result of the expiration of tax cuts and the start of massive, across the board budget slashing. Recall that the whole point of sequestration is to reduce the national deficit, and that the expiration of tax cuts would give the government even more revenue. 
So we asked simply: Were the United States to "go over the fiscal cliff," what do you expect would happen to the National Deficit?
At least according to the CBO and most economists, the correct answer is that "It will decrease."  Going over the Fiscal Cliff would, according a Congressional Budget Office study, result in a reduction in the National Deficit of $607 billion between fiscal years 2012 and 2013. 
As you can see from the chart - 87.4% of people have NO IDEA what will happen to the deficit if we go over the fiscal cliff. And the 12.6% who do know probably are all reading this diary right now. a

And what truly puts the cherry on top of the sundae of absurdity is the fact that the deficit is already falling, faster than at any time since World War II.

Believe it or not, the federal deficit has fallen faster over the past three years than it has in any such stretch since demobilization from World War II.
In fact, outside of that post-WWII era, the only time the deficit has fallen faster was when the economy relapsed in 1937, turning the Great Depression into a decade-long affair.
While long-term deficit reduction is important and deficits remain very large by historical standards, the reality is that the government already has its foot on the brakes.
From fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2012, the deficit shrank 3.1 percentage points, from 10.1% to 7.0% of GDP.
That's just a bit faster than the 3.0 percentage point deficit improvement from 1995 to '98, but at that point, the economy had everything going for it.
Other occasions when the federal deficit contracted by much more than 1 percentage point a year have coincided with recession. Some examples include 1937, 1960 and 1969.
President Obama hasn't gotten much credit for reining in the deficit, probably because a big part of the deficit progress has come from the unwinding of extraordinary government supports that he helped put in place.
Of course, if we go over the 'cliff', the deficit will fall even faster than it already is. So calls for reducing the deficit are just a smokescreen designed to help shred the safety net.

 

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site