Skip to main content

The answer: game the system so that wages remain low. This creates short term profits for corporations, since their expenses decline, but in the end without people to spend money on your products and services, i.e., without any demand for your "goods" pretty soon you end up with a depression.

(Reuters) - Average salaries in developed countries are expected to have risen by no more than inflation this year, the International Labour Organization said on Friday.

Developed country wages failed to keep up with inflation in both 2008 and 2011, but remained about 5 percent above the 2000 level in real terms, the ILO said in its Global Wage Report, published every two years.

"So far as we can tell for 2012 at this stage the trend seems to be for zero percent growth -- flatlining," ILO Director General Guy Ryder told a news conference in Geneva.

Note that reference was to the "average" salary, which includes salries for the rich as well as the ordinary Joe or Sally Workerbee.  Now we know some people's salaries are still rising, even after dramatic gains over the last several decades.  So, when you remove those outliers from consideration, ordinary workers (i.e., middle class and below) have seen their salaries and wages decline.  Highly compensated individuals save and invest their income in securities, real estate, etc. and generally do not use their wealth to increase demand for goods and services at anywhere near the rate that the middle class and the poor do.  This is the myth that the very rich are "job creators."  

I have started or helped start, dozens of businesses and initially hired lots of people. But if no one could have afforded to buy what we had to sell, my businesses would all have failed and all those jobs would have evaporated.

That's why I can say with confidence that rich people don't create jobs, nor do businesses, large or small. What does lead to more employment is a "circle-of-life" like feedback loop between customers and businesses. And only consumers can set in motion this virtuous cycle of increasing demand and hiring. In this sense, an ordinary middle-class consumer is far more of a job creator than a capitalist like me.

So when businesspeople take credit for creating jobs, it's a little like squirrels taking credit for creating evolution. In fact, it's the other way around.

In the past century, even many Republicans (after Roosevelt) understood that government needed to play a role in stimulating demand during a recession, and that stimulus funding had to be paid for by taxing those who benefit the most from our economic system, by progressive taxation, i.e., higher taxes on the rich. President Eisenhower and (gasp!) Ronald Reagan both raised taxes on the wealthy during their terms in office.  Nixon did as well, when he increased the capital gains tax from 35% to 35% in 1969.  From the mouth of Ronald Reagan himself in 1985:

We're going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that have allowed some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary, and that's crazy. It's time we stopped it….

What we're trying to move against is institutionalized unfairness. We want to see that everyone pays their fair share, and no one gets a free ride. Our reasons? It's good for society when we all know that no one is manipulating the system to their advantage because they're rich and powerful. But it's also good for society when everyone pays something, that everyone makes a contribution.

Gee, he sounds an awful lot like -- Billionaire investment guru, Warren Buffet!

... Buffett downplayed the idea that higher taxes for the wealthy, as proposed by the Obama administration as part of a deal to resolve the "fiscal cliff," would scare off critical investment for job creation. Republicans argue that raising taxes on people in higher tax brackets would choke off investment and slow the economy at a time when it can ill afford it.

Buffett disagrees. "No, and I think it would have a great effect on the morale of the middle class," said Buffett, in the first of two live interviews with TODAY's Matt Lauer. "They've had to watch guys like me pay below the rate by that paid by the people in my office."

Demand drives the economy and job creation, as Billionaire Nick Hanauer (see link citing his speech at a TED conference in March of this year) recognized.  In the short term, cutting jobs and wages creates profits, but only because a company's costs are reduced, not because such cost cutting increases revenues.  

Yet, what we are seeing worldwide, are policies demanding "austerity," which is short for imposing the burden of the "Great Recession" on the backs of the middles class and the poor, rather than the Big Banks that were bailed out, or the wealthy corporations, such as Walmart and Apple - to name but two of the more well known companies - who have practiced outsourcing jobs and lowering wages in order to increase their profits.  Take a gander at the European Union to see how well policies that require "austerity" have worked out.

Thus, it should come as no surprise that we are seeing declining wages for the vast majority of people around the world, and increasing income inequality.  The  result of policies that promote sustained income stagnation and/or decline, of course, is rarely a happy ending.  Wars and revolutions and the rise of extremist ideologies on both the left (Communism in its most extreme forms) and the right (Fascism) are the typical endgame.  We avoided such a result here in the US during the Great Depression because we had the good fortune to have FDR as our President.  Other nations were not so fortunate.  Economic instability is one of the fundamental causes of the rise of dictatorial regimes.  

Something to ponder as we consider the divergent proposals of the Republicans (i.e., no tax cuts on the rich, and dramatic cuts to the social safety net) and the Democrats (in short, tax increases on the wealthy and little to no cuts to Social Security, Medicare and health care reform).  We've seen the devastating effect of the Bush tax cuts over the last 12 years to our economy and our national debt.  They are the single largest factor in the increase to our national debt.  The end result of the so-called fiscal cliff crisis will determine whether we continue policies that threaten our economy and create more misery for most Americans, or put this nation back on the path to ending income inequality and creating the jobs and increasing wages that will fuel a more sustainable economy.  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (16+ / 0-)

    "If you tell the truth, you'll eventually be found out." Mark Twain

    by Steven D on Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 08:06:05 AM PST

  •  Since This Was All Proven 2/3 of a Century Ago (9+ / 0-)

    it's clear that global ownership, pressing forward with austerity, fully intends to inflict its consequences.

    We mustn't think they're somehow mistaken and will change their minds on hearing the right argument.

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 08:23:11 AM PST

    •  Worker-costs being the chief expense (4+ / 0-)

      of most enterprises, the goal long sought after by the Worshippers of Mammon (wealth) has been to have our grandchildren work for their grandchildren for free.

      If they can't get that immediately, then the closest they can manage. Hello globalization and Free Trade Agreements!

      The Internet is just the tail of the Corporate Media dog.

      by Jim P on Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 08:46:28 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Excuse me, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Steven D

    were you speaking?

    being mindful and keepin' it real

    by Raggedy Ann on Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 08:35:24 AM PST

  •  Too bad plutocrats & austerians own government; (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Steven D, Siri, greengemini, a2nite

    otherwise we might actually see policies that would work to start unwinding the Great Depression v. 2.0, instead of seeing the brutal and self-defeating infliction of ever more pain on the working poor around the world.

  •  Good's not a mystery.... (5+ / 0-)

    There are decades of historical data that support what these policies do to an economy; and the need for a middle class with enough money to spend.

    However, the immediate effects on investors' and CEOs' pockets from actions that force short-term gains, are documented as well.  I do believe that people have always, historically, sought short-term gain, whether it was pleasure or profit, or whatever.  

    But as we get more information faster, and we travel faster, and our attention spans dwindle to nanoseconds, I believe we (as people; the general "we") pursue the short-term crap more and more.

    Buy Aldus Shrugged : The Antidote to Ayn Rand, and tear Ayn and the GOP new orifices. Plus, I get a small royalty, and Jeff Bezos and his employees get the rest. Not a bad deal, as CEO Bezos is not much of a dick, relatively speaking. @floydbluealdus1

    by Floyd Blue on Fri Dec 07, 2012 at 08:45:25 AM PST

  •  Henry Ford Proved it a Hundred Years Ago (4+ / 0-)

    When asked why he was paying his workers an un-heard -of wage of $5 a day to assemble his cars, Henry replied that he was making sure people could afford to buy them.  What part of that common sense has changed?  Why aren't they teaching that in MBA school?  If companies use cheap labor overseas, why do they even ship their products to the USA, when unemployed people can't afford to buy whatever they're selling?  There's a disconnect here that only the non-MBAs can see.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site