Skip to main content

An article in The Huffington Post by Jack Mirkinson talks about what the New York Observer calls the “Media Winter”, hinting that the print media and corporate internet media will be facing layoffs and downsizing.  Some of these layoffs in the article included,
•    Roughly 120 staffers at The Daily found themselves out of a job when Rupert Murdoch shuttered the iPad newspaper on Monday.
•    The New York Times said it would ask at least 30 staffers to sign up for voluntary buyouts and threatened that it would have to lay people off if there were not enough takers.
•    Newsweek began what staffers fear will be a massive editorial purge.
•    The Cleveland Plain Dealer told its union employees to expect about a third of the newsroom staff to be cut.
•    And the Guardian announced that it is seeking to reduce its staff by 68 across its various titles.
Personally I believe the MSM would benefit immensely IF it followed Journalism’s Code of Ethics.

Follow me below the carrot spaghetti for my rant.

The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues.  Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties should strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty.  Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility.

Journalism’s Code of Ethics
Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.
Journalists should:

1.    Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise care to avoid inadvertent error. Deliberate distortion is never permissible.
2.    Diligently seek out subjects of news stories to give them the opportunity to respond to allegations of wrongdoing.
3.    Identify sources whenever feasible. The public is entitled to as much information as possible on sources' reliability.
4.    Always question sources’ motives before promising anonymity. Clarify conditions attached to any promise made in exchange for information. Keep promises.
5.    Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material, photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and quotations do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.
6.    Never distort the content of news photos or video. Image enhancement for technical clarity is always permissible. Label montages and photo illustrations.
7.    Avoid misleading re-enactments or staged news events. If re-enactment is necessary to tell a story, label it.
8.    Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information except when traditional open methods will not yield information vital to the public. Use of such methods should be explained as part of the story
9.    Never plagiarize.
10.    Tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human experience boldly, even when it is unpopular to do so.
11.    Examine their own cultural values and avoid imposing those values on others.
12.    Avoid stereotyping by race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, geography, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance or social status.
13.    Support the open exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.
14.    Give voice to the voiceless; official and unofficial sources of information can be equally valid.
15.    Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context.
16.    Distinguish news from advertising and shun hybrids that blur the lines between the two.
17.    Recognize a special obligation to ensure that the public's business is conducted in the open and that government records are open to inspection.

WOW! What a unique and refreshing approach it would be.  What a difference it would make in the WSJ, The New York Post, The Washington Examiner, Washington Times, Manchester (NH) Union-Leader, Daily Oklahoman, ABC, CBS, NBC,(both TV News and Radio News), Sunday News Shows.  Granted even Liberal News sources in MSM have been blurred in not living up to the JCoE.

Unfortunately, it leaves me with the “TASK” of reading two or sometimes multiple sources on news stories and then try to decipher what’s true and what’s not.  

At one time the public could rely on the MSM to find out the truth and report it.  Now I have to do it.  Damn!  I didn’t go to journalism school.  I’m not a journalist.  Come to think of it.  Why the hell did these kids and today’s journalists go to school for any way?  They all could have gone to the Katherine Gibbs School for stenography, which is what the profession is today.  I watch political debates and a journalist tells me what I just watched and heard.  They don’t tell me candidate X or Y is lying.  Yeah I said the word all journalists don’t have in their dictionaries – ‘Lying’.  They can’t report on policies.  They can’t report on corruption.  They can’t report.  Why?  Because they’re stenographers.  If an opinion is offered it’s their own bias one not one laid in truth.

Journalists what the fuck are they afraid of?
Journalists where are they?
Answer: Probably the way of a true “Statesman” another lost breed.

My dad (born in 1894) always said to me “No news is good news.”  With today’s journalists, this is so true.

I apologize for this rant but, thank God, the Daily Kos has given me the form to let my frustrations out.

Poll

What's your thought on Journalists?

27%3 votes
0%0 votes
36%4 votes
0%0 votes
27%3 votes
9%1 votes

| 11 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MrBigDaddy, Fleet

    Conservatives say if you don't give the rich more money, they will lose their incentive to invest. As for the poor, they tell us they've lost all incentive because we've given them too much money. -GC

    by cobaltbay on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 09:41:11 AM PST

  •  Code of Ethics? (0+ / 0-)

    Some interesting points, others are trivial, some are not the purview of the journalist but the publisher....in other words an example of piss poor journalism.

    The very concept of journalism in this age of advanced technology and very complex systems is archaic.  Only those who have studied these areas in detail--cybercrime, sexual identity-neuro-science-epidemiology to name a few, can have the depth of understanding which is the requirement before one can explain it to others.

    San Diego County where I live now has a single publisher, a right wing jingoist developer, who owns all the print papers. We canceled our subscription and now get the L.A. Times, which does employ real talented journalists.  But, now they are on the block, and the guy I just described is vying with Murdoch to take it over.

    There is a new model, an on line newspaper, Voice of San Diego, that has gotten national attention that is trying to fill the vacuum.  I have an opinion piece running on it, that I chose not to post on this site.  If you read it you will be able to guess why I made this choice, that I wish I didn't have to.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site