Skip to main content

U.S. Republican Senators John McCain (L) and Lindsey Graham talk during the Fiscal Responsibility Summit at the White House in Washington February 23, 2009.       REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque   (UNITED STATES)
Any gang led by these two is only going to do harm.
Deniers of reality in the Senate, led of course by Republicans and bolstered by a few soft-spined Democrats, are trying to find away to avoid allowing the Senate to become a marginally more functional body.
Influential senators, fearful of Majority Leader Harry Reid’s threat to jam filibuster changes through the Senate early next year, have begun back-channel talks to avoid what critics dub the “nuclear option.” [...]

So top Senate Republicans — including John McCain of Arizona, Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, Jon Kyl of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina — are trying to head off the showdown. They’re reaching out to Democrats who have expressed concerns about changing the rules by 51 votes, including Sens. Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Carl Levin of Michigan. And Republicans are reaching out to a key Reid ally, New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, the No. 3 Senate Democrat and chairman of the Rules Committee, to see whether a deal can be cut before the new Congress convenes in January.

Gee. Where have we heard that before? Maybe in 2005 when it was the Democrats, including Pryor, teaming up with—you guessed it—Lindsey Graham and John McCain and others to constitute the "Gang of 14" to prevent Democrats from filibustering George W. Bush's most heinous judicial picks. Or maybe you remember the January 2011 "Gentleman's Agreement," the set of empty promises from Republicans on reducing obstruction the last time Harry Reid threatened real filibuster reform. We all know how that worked out for judicial nominees and just about every other piece of critical legislation taken up since Democrats took the Senate back in 2007.

These senators say they are "alarmed that the move could fundamentally change the Senate: Future majorities could cite such a precedent to change whatever rules they want in an institution designed to protect the rights of the minority." Never mind that the minority has already fundamentally changed the Senate by abusing current rules and nearly grinding the body's actions to a halt. And never mind that the proposal Reid has floated retains minority protections and that the filibuster can still be used on final passage of bills—it just means that Republicans couldn't prevent simple debate from happening on a bill with a filibuster, and would actually have to do some real work to continue to make the Senate as dysfunctional as it is today.

And never mind that the Republicans, who have happily broken every other agreement made so far, are going to have absolutely no compunction about fucking over Democrats should they regain the majority in the near future. Let's look at the reality of what the Senate is now. The absolutely unprecedented obstruction by Republicans has prevented real deliberation, has made compromise essentially impossible, and has put the federal judiciary in a very real crisis.

The Senate has already been fundamentally changed. Reid's simple reforms might actually bring back the Senate these people say they revere.

Help make the filibuster a real, talking filibuster. Sign our petition.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 10:41 AM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site