Skip to main content

The myth of California as 'environmental leader' exposed!

The announcement Monday in Forbes magazine that Fresno has the dirtiest air and water in the nation is just more evidence that California is not a leader in environmental policies, but is in many ways behind the rest of the U.S. and the world.

According to Christopher Helman in Forbes Magazine, "The booby prize this year for Dirtiest City in America goes to Fresno, California. This Central Valley city suffers some of the worst air in the nation, and a water supply so degraded that the city used to tell pregnant women not to drink from the tap." (

"Fresno epitomizes the environmental challenges of the Golden State," said Helman. "And it’s not alone. Plenty of its neighbors in central California like Modesto, Stockton and Bakersfield have it almost as bad. (Other California metro areas ranked among the 20 Dirtiest Cities include San Jose, Riverside and Los Angeles — but don’t worry, they have lots of company from towns in the Midwest and on the East Coast, too.)"

The myth of an "Environmental California" is one of the biggest lies ever perpetuated. What the mainstream media and state officials tout as "progressive environmental policies" in California are often nothing more than greenwashing to further environmental degradation.

California has the dubious distinction of hosting the most environmentally destructive water diversion facilities in the world - the state and federal water project pumps that kill millions and millions of fish every year including Sacramento splittail, endangered Chinook salmon, steelhead, striped bass, Delta smelt, longfin smelt, threadfin shad and other fish species.

2011 was a record year for water exports to corporate agribusiness and Southern California, resulting in the "salvage" of a record 9 million Sacramento splittail and over 2 million other fish including Central Valley salmon, steelhead, striped bass, largemouth bass, threadfin shad, white catfish and sturgeon. In the face of this massive carnage, the DFG and Natural Resources Secretary John Laird did nothing. (

An analysis by the Golden Gate Salmon Association (GGSA) has found that since year 2000 over one hundred million fish (102,856,027) have been sucked into the delta pumps. This figure includes twenty six million valuable game fish, many of which are endangered.

And Jerry Brown, Natural Resources Secretary John Laird, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and President Barack Obama only aim to make things even worse by building the peripheral tunnels that will hasten the extinction of Central Valley salmon, Delta smelt longfin smelt and other imperiled species.

This is in spite of the fact that the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, signed by President George H.W. Bush in the fall of 1992, set a goal of doubling the Bay-Delta watershed’s Chinook salmon runs from 495,000 to 990,000 wild adult fish by 2002. The legislation also mandated the doubling of other anadromous fish species, including Central Valley steelhead, white sturgeon, green sturgeon, striped bass and American shad, by 2002.

Rather than doubling, the Central Valley Chinook salmon fishery has suffered a dramatic collapse over the past decade, now standing at only 13 percent of the population goal required by federal law. (

"The common people will pay for the peripheral canal and a few people will make millions," summed up Caleen Audrey Sisk, Chief and Spiritual Leader of the Winnemem Wintu Tribe. "It will turn a once pristine water way into a sewer pipe. It will be all bad for the fish, the ocean and the people of California."

Even worse, Natural Resources Secretary John Laird and other officials constantly tout California as a "leader" in marine protection when the Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) Initiative boondoggle that created alleged "marine protected areas" in state waters was the most corrupt environmental process I have ever encountered. In one of the greatest examples of conflict of interest in California history, Catherine Reheis-Boyd, the President of the Western States Petroleum Association, CHAIRED the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force for the South Coast.

The alleged "marine reserves" created under this unjust process failed to protect the ocean from oil drilling and spills, pollution, corporate aquaculture, wind and wave energy projects and all human impacts other than fishing and gathering.

It was only because of massive opposition by grassroots environmentalists, Tribal leaders and fishermen that PG&E's attempt to conduct seismic testing off marine reserves on the Central Coast that thousands of whales, dolphins, salmon, rockfish and other marine species were spared from injury and death.

And what is Reheis-Boyd doing now that her alleged "marine protected areas" are in place? She's relentlessly lobbying for offshore oil drilling, hydro fracking, the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline and the evisceration of California's environmental laws. She's also working to weaken air quality regulations in California. (

Reheis-Boyd, in today's letter in the Sacramento Bee, proclaims the "glories" of hydro fracking.

"Hydraulic fracturing has been employed in California for 60 years and there has never been evidence that it has caused harm to water supplies or the environment. As president of the Western States Petroleum Association, I can state that members remain committed to producing safe, reliable California energy supplies while continuing to protect the environment and public health," she claimed. (

Fresno's dubious honor of being the "dirtiest city in the land," the massive fish kills in the Delta pumps every year, the Brown administration campaign to build the peripheral tunnels and the corrupt Marine Life Protection Act Initiative are just four examples of how California is often behind the rest of the nation and world on environmental, fish, water and air issues.

I can give many more examples, including the failure of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Board to regulate agricultural pollution, the annual stranding of endangered coho salmon on the Scott and Shasta rivers caused by over pumping of water by irrigators, Jerry Brown's campaign to weaken the California Environmental Water Quality Act (CEQA) and the corruption and conflicts of interests that infest California environmental processes and government bodies ranging from the Bay Delta Conservation Plan to the regional water boards.

There is no doubt that California and the U.S. have many good laws that should protect the state's water, fish, land and air. These include the federal and state and Endangered Species Acts, CEQA, the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, the National Environment Policy Act and the California Fish and Game Code.

However, these laws aren't enforced like they should be. Too often rich and powerful corporate interests who commit major violations of state and federal environmental laws escape prosecution while recreational and commercial fishermen and tribal gatherers are harrassed for minor violations of the Fish and Game Code.

While an angler will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law for keeping an endangered salmon or forgetting to pinch down the barb on his hook, the water contractors and state and federal governments massacre millions of fish every year, including endangered salmon, Delta smelt and other listed species, in the state and federal Delta pumps with impunity. Where is the justice?

Originally posted to Dan Bacher on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 02:07 PM PST.

Also republished by California politics and Central Valley Kossacks.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  A bunch of no nothing do gooders (1+ / 0-)

    They are behind because everyone talks about the environment and Hollywood stars act like they care but nothing ever gets done. What a shame.

  •  From one extreme to the other . (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    old wobbly

    Santa Cruz County air is among the cleanest in the nation

    "Drop the name-calling." Meteor Blades 2/4/11

    by indycam on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 02:44:49 PM PST

    •  Coastal cities treat Central Valley cities as (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      colonies, basically. Winds off the Pacific push the Bay Area's pollution over to the Sierra Nevada, where it sits & mixes with what Fresno, etc. are making for themselves. And Berkeley, San Francisco, etc., take the cleanest water from the Sierra, leaving Valley cities to pump water out of polluted aquifers. At least Fresno is recycling at a higher rate than the supposedly greener-than-thou towns on the coast.

      •  You mean the Coastal Range, not Sierra Nevada (0+ / 0-)

        which is along the eastern edge of California.

        Yeah, Central & Sacramento Valley air quality is linked with the San Francisco Bay Area & other coastal communities auto exhaust & industry / refinery issues - their emissions are blown west to east.

        Water flows east to west - west coast has the big population centers, therefore the political power.

        The water policies of California are extremely complicated, much like they are for all the States west of the Mississippi River.

        I wish big business didn't have so much power, but it is the reality of things. California is just as human as any other community on the planet. A lot of us do the best we can.

        Something that doesn't make good sense, makes bad sense. That means someone is being deliberately hurtful & selfish. Look for motives behind actions & words.

        by CA wildwoman on Wed Dec 12, 2012 at 07:23:09 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  air facts (10+ / 0-)

    Central Valley cities have smoggy air because of prevailing winds and inversion layers that move the air from the densely urbanized Bay Area inland to the valley and trap it there. It is not all Fresno's smog by any means.

    Also, I have lived over half a century in California and believe me, the air is far, far cleaner than it was in the 1960's and 1970's despite a huge increase in population and the number of cars on the roads. This is due to air quality regulations which exceed anything anywhere else in this country. A day you could see across the Santa Clara Valley back then was a very unusual day. Now, when you cannot, it's an unusual day.

    I grant you the water issues. They are epically tragic.

  •  Mike Oz has a good rejoinder (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    hankmeister, ginja, elfling


    Yes, Fresno has poor air quality. Yes, the water here isn’t the greatest — though Forbes uses a 10-year-old example when plenty has been written about the subject since then....

    This thrusting of Fresno into the national eye comes just a week after Fresno made national headlines for something good and earth-friendly. Our recycling prowess — No. 1 in the nation, y’all! — was profiled by National Geographic...

    If you’re interested in following these issues beyond just when a national publication aggregates a rank-the-city list to bait you into clicking through a slideshow, you should certainly be reading Mark Grossi’s Earth Log on the Bee’s News Blog.

  •  Why is Fresno's water bad? (0+ / 0-)

    Do they use wells?

    "To recognize error, to cut losses, to alter course, is the most repugnant option in government." Historian Barbara Tuchman

    by Publius2008 on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 05:32:10 PM PST

  •  I don't see any relationship between the water (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    project you don't like and air quality in Central Valley.

  •  It is a bit of a shit-hole (0+ / 0-)


    The last time I left Fresno some damn fool was shooting a gun at my sorry-ass and I found the 99 freeway headed toward L.A.

    In a '72 Chevelle. Pulled-off at the second exit in Bumfuck pistacho-land and got away that time.

    Running alcohol.

    The dire straits facing America are not due poor people having too much money

    by Anthony Page aka SecondComing on Mon Dec 10, 2012 at 08:35:00 PM PST

  •  i told myself that if obama were mentioned in (0+ / 0-)

    in this diary i would stop reading it. he was mentioned. i should think that if fresno is as dirty as the diarist says it didn't just start in january of 2008.

    •  Wow! (0+ / 0-)

      So I guess you are one of those who tolerate no criticism of Obama, a president that has continued and expanded Bush's bad water, fish and environmental policies? Wow! So these things were bad when Bush did it but not bad when Obama does the same thing?

      •  I have plenty of criticism of Obama, (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        CA wildwoman

        but I have a hard time seeing Fresno as being his top priority or even a federal priority per se. Fresno's issues are longstanding, predating both Bush administrations. There are people closer to the problem who have tasks to do.

        I think there is much that can be done and that needs to be done.

        I would add that the voters of the central valley have tended to be people who are skeptical of environmental protection regulations, and this contributes to the situation as well.

        Fry, don't be a hero! It's not covered by our health plan!

        by elfling on Tue Dec 11, 2012 at 11:58:24 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Obama administration's endorsement of tunnels (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          CA wildwoman, mrsgoo

          It must be pointed out that Obama administration is the first federal administration to officially endorse the peripheral tunnels. While the problems of the Central Valley are long standing, even G.W. Bush didn't officially back a peripheral canal or tunnel. Fresno per se may not be a federal priority, but the investment of much federal staff time and money into the Bay Delta Conservation Plan indicates that diverting more water to corporate agribusiness and southern California water agencies is!

  •  Its been said before but... (0+ / 0-)

    The Central Valley is West Coast's Appalachia.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site