Skip to main content

 Usually when people talk about the labor market, they speak of job losses versus job gains...and it ends there.
   For instance, the debate usually involves the contents of these two charts, and sounds something like this.



  But anyone that actually works for a living knows there is a big difference between a good job and a bad job.

 For instance, if all jobs are equal, then why are wages still falling?


  The numbers are even worse when you factor in inflation.


  Falling wages is a sign that something is wrong that goes beyond headline employment numbers.

  The Census Department recently revised the way they calculated poverty to include such regional things as the cost of getting to work. The news media largely ignored the report.

 The number of people living in poverty in the United States rose last year to 49.7 million, based on a new measure that provides a fuller picture of poverty than that previously reported by U.S. Census Bureau data. The revised poverty rate of 16.1 percent is up more than a percentage point from the 15 percent figure reported by the government in September.
   Among those with some form of employment, 9.4 percent fell below the poverty line. Those working less than full-time, year-round, saw an 18.5 percent poverty rate.

  According to official numbers (pre-SPM numbers) an addition of 700,000 housholds went into poverty between 2009 and 2011.
  How do you classify a job recovery that sees rising levels of poverty?

  The number of part-time workers has increased 313,000 in just the past two months.

 The number of Americans working full time has declined by 5.9 million since September 2007, while the number working part time has jumped by 2.6 million.
 And that's not the worst part. Most of the jobs are not covered by unemployment benefits.


 Much of this trend is from an increasing number of people turning to lower-paying, self-employment.


  The fact is that most of the jobs created during this recovery have been low wage jobs.


  Newt Gingrich and Sean Hannity have tried to paint the picture that everyone that recieves any public assistance is a lazy, good-for-nothing who doesn't want to work. They specifically single out the growing numbers of food stamp recipients.
   The reality is that food stamp recipients are increasingly the working poor.


 Of the 52% of food stamp recipient households that aren't working poor, 8% are elderly and 20% are disabled. Not to mention the fact that 47% of all food stamp recipients are children.
   These are not people who have a choice between food stamps or a job.

 According to the Department of Agriculture report, about five million non-elderly adults who receive food stamps are working. Another 4.4 million are unemployed and looking for work. Millions more have joined the ranks of "discouraged" workers who've given up looking for work after months, and in some cases more than a year, of unsuccessful job searches. That shouldn't be surprising, given the reality that for more than 2½ years, the number of jobless Americans has outstripped the number of available job openings by more than 4 to 1.
99% of food stamp recipients live in poverty.

  With the labor force increasingly vulnerable and underpayed, it should be no surprise that saving and investing have dropped through the floor.


  In fact, far more people are leaving the workforce via disability than getting new jobs.



   Now that the election is over, we can stop the knee-jerk defence of Obama's economic record and start addressing the real problems.
   The poverty rate is climbing and wages are falling and you don't need a government chart to know this is true. It doesn't matter what pretty numbers you throw out, if this is the reality then there is nothing worth defending here.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site