Skip to main content

Health care reform demonstration with woman holding
Here's a bit more tea leaf reading on what might be happening in fiscal cliff negotiating, on the Democratic side. If you squint at it right, the signs are there that raising the Medicare eligibility age is out of the mix. First, there's a kick-ass op-ed in USA Today from Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, detailing just how harmful the proposal could be.
[I]n the talks to avert the fiscal cliff, the idea of raising the Medicare age is central to the Republican proposal. There's just one critical problem: It doesn't work. It doesn't have public support. It's unfair. And it doesn't lower health expenditures.

Such a proposal is a reflection of the broader Republican plan: an assault on the middle class, seniors—and our future. Republicans like to talk about their ideas in terms of abstract numbers. However, we cannot ignore the adverse impacts of their policies on the American people. [...]

She goes on to detail how the cut would ripple throughout the health care system, adversely affecting everyone from employers to younger people. It's a high profile takedown of one of the main ideas being forwarded by the Very Serious People in Washington, and at least some of the folks who have a say. But is she speaking for President Obama and all Democrats? That's a big unknown, but the second piece of evidence out there could mean the idea is on the outs.

The Center for American Progress, an organization very closely allied to the Obama administration, just released this report unambigously titled "Raising the Medicare Eligibility Age Would Harm Seniors and Increase Health Care Spending." The crux of their argument:

Raising the eligibility age would harm seniors even if every state fully implements the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion. But the proposal poses an even greater threat to low-income seniors now that the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the law rendered the Medicaid expansion optional for states. As we explain below, tens of thousands of low-income 65- and 66-year-olds, who would be cut off from Medicare—particularly the most vulnerable seniors living below the federal poverty level—will have nowhere to turn for coverage if their states reject the Medicaid expansion.
Throwing more people off of Medicare makes no sense from a fiscal standpoint. It just shifts costs to individuals, to employers, to states and actually increases health care spending. And it hurts people. These arguments, and full-throated and sustained opposition from progressives, from advocacy organization, and from the public in poll after poll, might have just killed this idea for Democrats, at least for the time being. Two establishment figures—Nancy Pelosi and CAP—could be telegraphing that.

Which is good, if that's the case. Now we have to start to work shooting down the idea some Democrats are coalescing behind that more means testing for Medicare is the way to go. It's already means tested. Going further erodes the promise of equal care at equal charge for people who have paid into the system throughout their working lives.

3:39 PM PT: Or not. In an interview with ABC News, here's Obama:

Raising the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 is "something that's been floated," Obama said, not dismissing the idea outright.

"When you look at the evidence, it's not clear that it actually saves a lot of money," he said. "But what I've said is let's look at every avenue, because what is true is we need to strengthen Social Security, we need to strengthen Medicare for future generations, the current path is not sustainable because we've got an aging population and health care costs are shooting up so quickly."

It's still a really bad idea, Mr. President.

Originally posted to Joan McCarter on Tue Dec 11, 2012 at 03:27 PM PST.

Also republished by The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Meteor Blades, skybluewater, SME in Seattle, bink, Renee, Angie in WA State, cslewis, Sylv, chuck utzman, Irfo, hester, slinkerwink, Gooserock, PeterHug, Andrew C White, eeff, willyr, TX Unmuzzled, Duncan Idaho, jancw, expatjourno, eyeswideopen, bronte17, cyberKosFan, Einsteinia, susakinovember, whenwego, pedrito, Nate Roberts, Eddie C, revsue, psnyder, figbash, 2laneIA, defluxion10, RebeccaG, grrr, lcrp, inclusiveheart, ybruti, lonespark, Wife of Bath, Sybil Liberty, Skennet Boch, drofx, radarlady, 3goldens, ichibon, irate, sc kitty, Alice Venturi, wallys son, Flint, dewtx, Dobber, Laurence Lewis, ratzo, bleeding blue, Sun Tzu, skyounkin, markdd, Ozzie, spunhard, xaxnar, Jim R, splashoil, Jim P, begone, Born in NOLA, velaski, Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse, vigilant meerkat, Kimball Cross, rl en france, martyc35, kestrel9000, DarkestHour, triv33, twigg, real world chick, el cid, sceptical observer, Timothy J, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, bstotts, ms badger, sea note, BentLiberal, ammasdarling, Tamar, One Pissed Off Liberal, phonegery, fabucat, Habitat Vic, tgypsy, puakev, beth meacham, dclawyer06, deepeco, jedennis, leonard145b, madgranny, trueblueliberal, JDWolverton, MKinTN, CroneWit, mconvente, TruthFreedomKindness, also mom of 5, HappyinNM, wayoutinthestix, zerone, prettyobvious, Involuntary Exile, elwior, treesrock, KJG52, jamess, Therapy, Lujane, tofumagoo, petulans, venger, Tonga 23, JamieG from Md, Nica24, Mike Taylor, maggiejean, prettygirlxoxoxo, Rhysling, cybrestrike, J M F, Throw The Bums Out, Scott Wooledge, Alex Budarin, maryabein, Zotz, mkor7, papahaha, kevinpdx, sfarkash, Lacy LaPlante, emptythreatsfarm, FogCityJohn, flitedocnm, Crabby Abbey, Progressive Pen, Polly Syllabic, sunny skies, ATFILLINOIS, melpomene1, gulfgal98, Lady Libertine, ItsSimpleSimon, Puddytat, Egalitare, sharonsz, addisnana, Betty Pinson, ericlewis0, cocinero, Oh Mary Oh, fiercefilms, stevenaxelrod, Onomastic, mama jo, Liberal Capitalist, Mr MadAsHell, BlueJessamine, OhioNatureMom, smiley7, marleycat, thomask, Wolf10, whaddaya, ratcityreprobate, stlsophos, Willa Rogers, Mentatmark, SouthernLiberalinMD, allergywoman, SycamoreRich, wolf advocate, Cordyc, anodnhajo, SparkyGump, cwsmoke, pistolSO, Siri, Citizenpower, IndieGuy, rustypatina, S F Hippie, effervescent, Trotskyrepublican, JGibson, congenitalefty, Mr Robert, BobSoperJr, geojumper, radical simplicity, MartyM, pittie70, Vote4Obamain2012, avsp, marty marty, dotdash2u, George3, wasatch, Marjmar, fauve, Sue B, simple serf, Illinois IRV, jbob, Linda1961, Panama Pete, goodpractice, The Hamlet, alice kleeman, Jollie Ollie Orange, marcr22, chicklet, pragmaticidealist, MBishop1, Catkin, Chas 981

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site