Skip to main content

... is terrible parents. Most M video games are designed for adults. I know it's common knowledge that  "only kids play video games," but that's completely wrong. The average age of video game players is 37.  (Cannot hyperlink PDFs: 72% of Americans households play video games, including 29% of individuals over the age of 50. If you do NOT play video games, you are clearly in the minority. That's all ESA demographic data released for investors, and considering that their purview is knowing which audience to target with advertising, I'm pretty sure they know what they're talking about.

Adults play video games, we just don't talk about it. And considering what happened to Colleen Lachowicz, I wonder why? Colleen is a Kossack by the way (and she won that race, despite the Maine Republican Party being complete cocks.)

Only about 5% of games are rated "Mature" every year. Those 5% of games only account for about 10-15% of games sales in any given year. And these are only numbers from games that are rated. Companies like Pop-Cap games sell millions of games that aren't counted, because they aren't rated, and they aren't under the purview of the ESA. So there's a lot of data missing from their numbers. If included, that data would make M rated games an even smaller portion of games produced and consumed by Americans. The most violent of these games I've been able to find is a game called Plants vs. Zombies, a game for a number of platforms including, PC, Ipad, Macs, and most phones. It's incredibly cartoonish and involves plants defending a home from waves of non-scary zombies with peas, pumpkins, and the odd corn cob.

So violent video games are a tiny minority of the video games out there. The majority of games are rated E-for-everyone, and are really, really tame.

A lot of people are concerned about the blood-and-gore games, and that's understandable. People have been asking for a "ban" on children purchasing games designed for adults. And I would agree with imposing such a ban, if it didn't already exist based on store policies.

Children cannot purchase or rent M-for-mature games in the United States. Only a legal adult can purchase those games. While some stores will allow 17 year-olds to purchase the games, because mature is 17 and older (NC-17, essentially) many store policies require an actual 18-year-old adult to purchase these games. You often see mortified 16 and 17 year olds with mothers in tow in game stores. I actually sometimes wander into video games stores just to watch the people because it's hilarious to watch a beet-red 17 year old bringing his mother with him to buy Call of Duty Black Ops, or some other shoot-em-up.

These games get into the hands of small children when terrible parents aren't paying attention to the media their children consume. They're rated M-For-Mature, a 17 and older ONLY rating. "Rated M for Mature, 17+" is stamped right on the box, it is said out loud in the advertisements, and plastered all over the websites. There's even an age-limit gateway to enter the websites in question, where you have to put in your birthday. These games aren't hiding the violence in them. The violence in them is stamped right on the box. When I was growing up, such games were banned in my home, even when I was 17, because my younger brother was 12, and wasn't ready for mature games yet. I was allowed to have T-Rated games, but only for my computer.

Another excellent diary on this same subject deals with Adam Lanza's favorite video game. The completely bloodless "Dynasty Warriors."

So when someone in the NRA says "Guns aren't the problem, VIDEO GAMES ARE THE PROBLEM," ask them why the majority of Americans haven't committed mass murder yet. 72% is such a clear majority of Americans that it could get a bill passed in the senate.

This is a correlation, not a causation.

And I'll also point out that violent video games are enjoyed the world round. South Korea has a video game addiction problem, and I'm not aware of any violent shootings in South Korea. This exists in many Asian countries, including china. When one Kossack asked if people in Asia played video games five hours a day like some American children do, there was a rude but informative response.

People in Asia play videogames until they die. And I don't mean from old age, there are videogame addicts in asia who play videogames to death. Some die after 72-hours. Some die after a 2-week marathon. It happens all the time, and it's a huge social problem that thankfully, we don't seem to have in anywhere near the severity that Asian nations do. And their games are just as fantastically violent as ours.

You cannot make the case that video games lead to spates of horrific violence, if those spates of horrific violence only happen in one of the places where video games are played obsessively. It may suit the sensibilities of the NRA and the pearl clutching moral guardians, but there are absolutely no facts to back up this argument, whatsoever. Now there are social problems with video games and gaming culture, such as the portrayal of women, and video game addiction, but there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that video games cause violence.

If you've heard any talking points on this, or any "Facts" being dropped by NRA bobbleheads about how video games are Satan incarnate, drop them here. There are a LOT of Gamers on Dailykos, and either I or one of them will be happy to refute this horrific little lie that distracts from our real issues:  the deadly combination of inexpensive and readily available weapons of war and a national epidemic of untreated mental illness.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site