Skip to main content

How dare he. His 'friends' at the NRA are in pain? What are the families of the Newtown massacre victims supposed to feel?

Pro-gun Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) said Wednesday he is "proud" of the National Rifle Association for agreeing to take part in the debate on gun control in the wake of the Newtown massacre.

"We cannot have an open dialogue with meaningful input unless the NRA is at the table," Manchin told MetroNews' "Talkline" in West Virginia. "These are my friends. These are good people. They're hurting. They're in pain the same as every American, what happened to those little children."

Sen. Joe Manchin's appearance on MSNBC Monday where he claimed that he would be for an assault weapons ban was basically a head fake.

The usual sequence of events is playing itself out, where pro-gun rights advocates and lobbyists go into a self-imposed silence immediately after an assault weapons massacre, then creep out after the initial shock and mourning wears off.

Days after the massacre the NRA finally made a statement four days after the fact, claiming they want to make 'a contribution' to help avoid future such instances.

Manchin admits he needs the NRA to tell him what to do:

“I can’t say ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to any of the things,” Manchin added when asked if he would support restrictions on magazine size or an assault weapons band. “Because all I’ve asked for, I want the NRA to tell me why we have any weapon you might want. Is there any grounds or any changes or anything they would like to look at? I don’t know. I can’t even get a conversation to have responsible people at the party, if you will, or the table, to finally come out with a conclusion.”

Originally  W. Va's Joe Manchin made news by claiming he would support an assault weapons ban on MSNBC's Morning Joe.  

“Seeing the massacre of so many innocent children has changed everything,” he said. “Everything has to be on the table.”

Gun rights advocates have always said that an assault weapon bans would lead to further gun controls and eventually a repeal of the Second Amendment, but Manchin and Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough both commented that the Second Amendment shouldn’t protect the right to own weapons designed for combat.

“I’m a proud outdoors-man and huntsman, like many Americans, and I like shooting, but this doesn’t make sense,” Manchin said. “I don’t know anyone in the sporting and hunting arena who goes out with an assault rifle; I don’t know anyone who needs 30 rounds in the clip to go hunting.”

Manchin said that after the fiscal cliff is resolved, this will be a high priority.
Newtown’s shooting “has changed the dialogue and it should move beyond dialogue, we need action.”

But now that he has gotten that talking point out into the broad public via a national TV show, appearing to say all the right things, he is 'clarifying' his statements, quietly on a local radio station's broadcast, where he spews some nonsense about needing to have a conversation with the NRA at the table.
“I’m not afraid to have these conversations and I know I’m going to get criticized,” Senator Manchin said on Wednesday’s MetroNews Talkline.  He was a guest on the show for the second time this week to talk about his position on firearm regulatory changes and what should be done after the Newtown.

“I am open to talking about how do we have a better society with less violence and not blame just the gun owner, because if you blame the gun owner, you’re blaming me,” the Senator said.

Host Hoppy Kercheval asked Senator Manchin if he will support California Senator Dianne Feinstein’s proposed bill to reinstate the ban on assault weapons.  That ban first took effect in 1994 and expired in 2004.

“I’m not supporting a ban on anything.  I’m supporting a conversation on everything,” Senator Manchin said.

“I can’t say ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to any of the things because all I’ve asked for, I want the NRA to tell me why we have any weapon you might want.  Is there any grounds or any changes or anything they would like to look at?  I don’t know.  I can’t even get a conversation to have responsible people at the table to finally come out with a conclusion.”

Because, talking about the issue will, of course, be the same as taking action. And the NRA must, of course, be part of the conversation, because they are the most powerfulgun rights lobby in the US.
In a statement issued Tuesday, the first since the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School, officials with the National Rifle Association said the following: “The NRA is prepared to offer meaningful contributions to help make sure this never happens again.”
No word of what that 'contribution' would be, other than gracing the table with their presence.

Back to the usual talking points:

“The gun didn’t shoot itself.  It didn’t commit that act by itself.  It couldn’t.”  The Senator says that’s why the response to Newtown must include large scale reviews of violence in the media along with mental health diagnosis and treatment in the United States.
He referred to the video game Grand Theft Auto, "up in New York City" (you know, the Gomorrah responsible for all evil in the world).

And be warned, he will not allow his 'friends' at the NRA to be 'villainized', coining a new phrase. At least he didn't say victimized.

Somehow, I am just not feeling the NRA's 'pain'.

The link to Manchin's interview is here, (audio only), not embeddable.

Originally posted to Barefoothoofcare on Wed Dec 19, 2012 at 12:52 PM PST.

Also republished by Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA) and Shut Down the NRA.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site