Skip to main content

    Wayne LaPierre, who is head of the NRA implied today that people with equal firepower don't die -- yet -- LaPierre had to surround himself with armed guards today because obviously LaPierre doesn't even believe his own bullshit.

LaPierre: "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,"
    LaPierre started by saying that "gun-free zones" cause mass murder, not the easy access to assault weapons.
LaPierre: Politicians pass laws for gun free school zones ... And, in doing so, they tell every insane killer in America that schools are the safest place to inflict maximum mayhem with minimum risk.
    But wait, aren't the buildings of Congress 'gun-free zones?'

     Is LaPierre going to demand that those gun-barrel sucking politicians he buys pass a law lifting the ban on carrying loaded AK-47's in the buildings of Congress?

     Then, without meaning to, LaPierre explained exactly why America needs to ban assault weapons.

LAPIERRE: The truth is, that our society is populated by an unknown number of genuine monsters. People that are so deranged, so evil, so possessed by voices and driven by demons, that no sane person can every possibly comprehend them. They walk among us every single day, and does anybody really believe that the next Adam Lanza isn’t planning his attack on a school, he’s already identified at this very moment?
    Exactly, there are deranged people in America who are planning mass murders and who can easily go out and buy as many assault weapons as they please and as many assault magazines as they please -- so clearly we need to Ban those weapons so we can reduce the number of murders by assault weapons as we can.


Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I was slightly concerened (5+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    XenuLives, Sylv, splashy, ssgbryan, CroneWit

    that the NRA might come out and soften their message and express nothing but sympathy for the dead children. I was afraid this would buy them enough time to work behind the scenes and kill any gun legislation while appearing to be halfway sane.

    Obviously that fear was unfounded. LaPierre came right out and sounded like the kook that he is.

  •  Exactly. It does not matter what the base cause (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    a2nite, Sylv, splashy

    for someone to pick up a gun and slaughter people. If they don't have access to guns that can kill people they can not act out thier own mental problems on others. At least some regulation would prevent them being able to compete with previous killers as to numbers. All we have to do is look at other countries who have the same games, the same movies & TV, the same human model,... to see it is effective to reduce the death toll...

    What is even more upsetting is the idea to bring guns into the mix every day, adding to the opportunities for tragedy when a guard with his own issues shoots a kid for pulling out a toy gun. If still had kids in school I would pull them out if they allowed guns which could be taken by a sufficiently big enough kid.

    Fear is the Mind Killer...

    by boophus on Fri Dec 21, 2012 at 10:52:34 AM PST

  •  You know what Wayne? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    You said:

    People that are so deranged, so evil, so possessed by voices and driven by demons, that no sane person can ever possibly comprehend them.
    You're right. And now we're damned sure that person is you.
  •  Capitol gun control (0+ / 0-)

    Just why are the halls of Congress gun-free zones?  Could it be that our NRA-loving congresspeople's afraid of gun-toting fellow congresspeople's or the public?  Why can they work in gun-free zone and not the rest of us?  Same reason they get pensions using the real CPI, medical care that is gold-plated and for LIFE, and much much more.  

    But let's talk about guns.  Surely they should be required to pack heat.  And, so should everyone who enters the building.   How else can everyone be protected?  
    Oh right.  They have a better way: total ban on guns.

    The word hypocrites is so overused, I suggest we coin a synonym: congressperson.

  •  Who pays in money and blood? (0+ / 0-)

    Let gun owners pay for the millions of new police, and their pensions, and their death benefits.  I wonder what the added cost per gun would be?  Perhaps $100 thousand a year per gun?

    Given that this group tends to be the so-called fiscal conservatives fighting for small government, they sure have a funny way of expressing it.spend spend spend.  Hire hire hire.  But then they get to keep their toys.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site