Skip to main content

Jeez, talk about a fucked up thing to do to a guy. The president just basically torpedoed whatever deal is being worked out between Joe Biden and Mitch McConnell by saying something along the lines of "I am so glad Republicans have agreed to vote for a tax increase with no spending cuts."

This, more than anything else, is going to make it difficult for House Republicans to support. That level of support will be directly proportional to how many votes the deal gets on the Senate floor.

That's the upside for Democrats. That once again, the House Republicans will save us from President Obama.

But if they don't and it passes?

The downside is that they may just decide that McConnell's accurate reading of the logic makes sense: that by removing the issue of taxes from the discussion, Republicans will be in a position to say "we already voted to increase its your turn." That is even though most Republicans will vote against the bill and it will pass with Democratic votes. So, in the end...we will getting just over $700 billion in revenue when we asked for $1.6 trillion. And what do we get in return for this? A few morsels of nothing.

So this all works our for our side if Republicans conclude that protecting the rich is more important than cutting spending. If they do, we win because they'll kill the deal and suffer for it. Then we will get across the board Clinton rates and that's a good thing all around.

But the downside is that the enough of the GOP defects and votes with Democrats for this crap deal and then we get stuck with it while the GOP avoids any of the blame or costs.

Better to just go over the cliff and do this thing right, but you go to battle with the Democrats you have...etc. etc.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site