Some scientists at Georgia Tech (and Xiamen University, China) have accidentally stumbled on an amazingly efficient and simple way to generate electricity. Its literally as simple as rubbing two pieces of plastic against each other.

Despite improvements by Wang’s team and others, such piezoelectric devices have generated mere micro-watts of power. Until, that is, they wrapped one in plastic.

While investigating one piezo generator, Feng-Ru Fan, one of Wang’s graduate students, put a layer of plastic known as PMMA on top of it for protection. The generator in turn was sitting on a different plastic called Kapton. When Fan measured the device’s performance, he consistently found it was generating a higher voltage than expected. Fan and Wang spent months investigating what was happening, before concluding that the added power was coming from static electricity. When the PMMA and Kapton come into contact and rub against one another, friction generates electrical charges.

Science Magazine, Jan. 4, 2013

Sounds like something out of Thomas Edison's lab, doesn't it? "Science is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration." This is a great example of why you cannot predict innovation, you can only fund people with good track records and stay out of their way. A few more details below the fold.

Their NanoLetters paper is available on-line for free; and the innovation is so simple, anyone with a high school education can understand it. The hard part is creating the nano-material in the first place. (Its the microscopic bumping of the surface which raises the surface area, and hence the current production.)

Such a flexible polymer TEG gives an output voltage of up to 3.3 V at a power density of ~10.4 milli-watts/cm3.

NanoLetters paper

10 milliwatts doesn't sound like much (1/100th of a Watt); but you get that from one square centimeter of one layer of this device.

There are 6.25 sq cm in one sq. in. So that is ~62mW/sq in (about 1/16 W). The bottom of one of my shoes is about 12" x 3", or 36 sq in. Walking at a normal pace should generate about 2 Watts. And that's with one layer of material.

Wang says he is already considering making square meter–sized devices with up to 200 layers of nanogenerators stacked atop one another for use in harvesting ocean power. Such a device may be able to produce as much as 40 kilowatts of power per cubic meter, which could make nanogenerators a large-scale power source.

Science Magazine, Jan. 4, 2013

Forty KILO-watts from a bunch of inert plastic floating in the ocean. BTW, the plastic ought to cost out at under \$1/Watt at current prices for Kapton (which is sort of expensive).

----

And this administration is still pushing for clean coal, nuclear subsidies, and fracking. Meanwhile, the GOP are still screaming "Drill, Baby, Drill." Washington makes me sick. Science makes me feel good.

Too bad our owned-by-oil-company politicians will underfund this, and the Chinese will take it over.

What, me cynical and pessimistic?

#### Tags

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
 Unpublish Diary (The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.) Delete Diary (The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

#### Comment Preferences

• ##### You'd be surprised(6+ / 0-)

what I can do with just milliwatts anyway.

Just for funsies, I built an LED color changing lamp this evening that runs off my computer's USB port.  I wasn't minding power usage and wasn't using hyper-efficient sources or design.  (I'm old, married, and get bored a lot).

It's still a workably-bright night light (assuming the constantly rotating colors don't bother you) that uses 3.3 volts at 40 total milliamps, or 0.13 watts.

Still, I'll be interested to see how and if this scales.  So frequently things don't scale up well.

(-6.25, -6.77) Moderate left, moderate libertarian

• ##### Yes. Instead of building bigger power plants...(2+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
Chi, PeterHug

we should be focused on making more energy efficient gadgets.

• ##### It will be interesting to see if anything...(2+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
arendt, PeterHug

develops from this.

An investment in knowledge pays the best interest. ~ Ben Franklin

• ##### I understand that headlines don't translate...(0+ / 0-)

into real results. They have announced about a million cancer cures. :-)

But this one is so simple that anyone with some technical ability can try to improve on what has been done here. I'm counting on small scale innovation of simple devices, versus the ponderous, expensive infrastructure that dominates today's energy system. (Billion dollar floating oil platforms, millions of gallons of fracking  fluids, multi-billion dollar boondoggle nuclear plants.)

• ##### Better than fracking over the long run... n/t(2+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
arendt, splashy

"Daddy, every time a bell rings, a Libertaria­n picks up his Pan Am tickets for the Libertaria­n Paradise of East Somalia!"

• ##### And way better than nuke plants...(2+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
unclebucky, splashy

Cheap, safe, non-polluting. Plus, you can wear this power source or put it on your property (e.g., connect it to a windmill).

That's why I expect it to be underfunded. This technology takes people a lot closer to living off the grid.