Skip to main content

“Like most others, I was a seeker, a mover, a malcontent, and at times a stupid hell-raiser. I was never idle long enough to do much thinking, but I felt somehow that some of us were making real progress, that we had taken an honest road, and that the best of us would inevitably make it over the top.

At the same time, I shared a dark suspicion that the life we were leading was a lost cause, that we were all actors, kidding ourselves along on a senseless odyssey.

It was the tension between these two poles - a restless idealism on one hand and a sense of impending doom on the other - that kept me going.”

~ Hunter S. Thompson, The Rum Diary

I imagine Aaron Swartz battled that same tension in his bright short life. Probably on a daily basis. The tragedy of his death has been discussed elsewhere, it is a great loss. Thankfully, he had a good friend in Laurence Lessig. Today Lessig writes a fairly succinct piece that cuts to the chase.
It won't bring him back. But the loss of the Internet activist has prompted a bill in Congress that would protect others from the same kind of prosecutorial abuse.

I make no claim whatsoever to any kind of tech genius. I am one very happy Luddite who sees no need to awaken my inner geek. The internet is a tool for me, period, and I'm forever grateful to those individuals, like Aaron, for their wizardry that make it easy for people like me to use it.

I am also infinitely grateful for those wonky people who have the dedication to watchdog, and challenge when need, the laws that lag behind.  Like Lessig:

Computer law is different, however, because Congress didn't really understand this "wild west" (as the network was called when Congress passed the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in 1986), and because geeks make them uncomfortable. For 25 years, the CFAA has given federal prosecutors almost unbridled discretion to bully practically anyone using a computer network in ways the government doesn't like. It does that by essentially criminalizing the violations of a site's "terms of service" in combination with obtain[ing] anything of" at least $5,000 in value. And even if in the vast majority of cases prosecutors exercised that discretion, well, in this case the abuse of that discretion has ended in tragedy. As Tim Wu so brilliantly describes, we have built a system of criminal law that depends upon our trusting the government. Few civil libertarians from either the right or the left, though, will be surprised that it turns out that the bureaucrats manning the battle stations cannot be trusted.


Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) has introduced a draft bill -- importantly, first on Reddit, a platform Aaron had helped to build, and, once she gets the Net's feedback, in the United States Congress -- to change this rule of the CFAA and return contract law to its civil home. Her bill, which she calls "Aaron's Law," would limit the scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and exclude "crimes" that are nothing more than a breach of contract. No more "felonies." No more prosecutions resulting in prison sentences. Violations of the "terms of service" would be a breach, not a crime. Had that change been made before Aaron's death, the government's felony charges would likely have collapsed. Had the government's charges collapsed, Aaron Swartz, in my view, would still be frantically working to make the world a better place.

In days - weeks - years to come, this next generation coming up will be handed off a lifeway that is instantaneous in time, global in scope. If my teenage daughter is any indication, they will assume a technological command of it in ways that my generation only imagined in science fiction. Considering the dire condition our planet will be in by then, do we not owe it to them to at least... at the very least... to give them the best and fullest free access to information and the tools they'll need and depend on... just to live? And advocate.

I think we do.

We need to recognize the pace at which we are evolving. And work toward a just governance that will keep pace as well. As we, as progressives, advocate for less lethal or fewer guns, and for more & better regulations of them, etc, do we not also want to advocate to ensure better, more enlightened management of the alternative 'weaponry' that is information and technology?

I say we do.


Cuz it sure ain't gonna be our grandpa's way. ;-)

Woody Guthrie's guitar Pictures, Images and Photos

For Aaron. For Daniel. For Emily. For all of us.

You know what to do: Demand Justice

Originally posted to DFH writers group on Thu Jan 17, 2013 at 11:51 AM PST.

Also republished by Occupy Wall Street.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site