Skip to main content

I'm currently finishing the final draft of the second of three contemporary fantasy novels.  In these novels, our own world is one of six interlinked worlds through which magical power flows. Our world, which has the least magic, is called the Changing Land; and the reason that magic doesn't work so well here is because there's too much change going on.  Magic, at least in this particular cosmology, needs a certain metaphysical stillness so that it can pool, ferment, and become potent.

Now, the idea of the Changing Land came about because I've seen, as who hasn't, so much change in my own life -- remember when everybody smoked?  remember when the ice man brought blocks of ice into the kitchen and fitted it in the top of the ice box?  remember when the ayrabs came down the alleyways, selling fruits and vegetables out of their horse-drawn carts? remember CPM computers?  remember manual typewriters? remember parents telling kids that if they were lost or in trouble, all they had to do was ask an adult for help?

Yeah, those were simpler times.

But, the point is -- things do change.  I know that.  But sometimes, I forget just how much things have changed, until, oh, I read a book, or, in this case, a set of books.

Follow me below the squiggly thing, if you're interested in Miss Buncle.

(warning:  possible spoilers for Miss Buncle's Book and Miss Buncle, Married.)

'way back in the dim mists of time, say between 1923 and 1970, a woman in Edinburgh, Scotland made her living writing books.  Her name was D.E. Stevenson and she was a very successful writer, selling millions of copies of her books in England and in the U.S.

In 1923, she wrote a novel called Miss Buncle's Book.  In it, we meet Barbara Buncle, spinster, who has turned to writing in desperation; she's running out of money, because the dividends have stopped coming in, and, well, it was either keep chickens or write a novel.

The problem being that Miss Buncle has no imagination, so she writes about her neighbors in the village of Silverstream, changing the names very slightly (Silverstream becomes Copperfield, for instance, and Mrs. Horsely Downs, a self-centered and disagreeable woman, becomes Mrs. Featherstone Hogg).  Amazingly, the book is acquired, and published under a pseudonym; all the neighbors recognize themselves and hijinks ensue as they try to find who among them is the "traitor."  

Miss Buncle in the meantime, and at the behest of her publisher, commences upon a sequel.

My husband and I read this novel out loud to each other (our habit at the end of the day, to sort of clear our heads, is to read someone else's book), and adored it.  It's truly a writer's book, and everything in it is true, in precisely the way that The Unstrung Harp is true -- only much, much funnier.

We had so much fun with this book that when it came to our attention that there was a sequel, Miss Buncle, Married, we wasted no time ordering it in.

When we last saw Miss Buncle, in . . .Book, she was a bestselling author.  In the new novel she is, as advertised, married.  The book's adventures have to do with the bride locating the perfect house for her husband and herself, and the settling in to the village of Wandlebury.  Her publisher wants another book from her, but she's written nothing for 18 months.

It's an amusing enough book, and about half-way through, Barbara does become inspired and (in a fortnight!) scrambles out the first draft of a novel, which is then locked away in a drawer.  Her husband asks if she's going to publish it, but she puts him off, until, at the very end of the book -- the climax, in fact! -- she announces that she will not be going back to her book to get it into shape for publication, that she has, in fact, More Important Work, for. . .

. . .she's pregnant.

There's a little discussion after that of the blissful state of motherhood that awaits her, and so the book comes to an end.

Man, I wish I hadn't read that.  And try as I might, remembering that the second novel (more than the first) is a Product of Its Time; I can't get the bad taste out of my mouth.  I mean, honestly, second drafting a novel isn't that much work, and she's going to have nine whole months before the Blessed Event overtakes her.  Surely, surely she could have finished the book?  Why did it have to be either/or?

I haven't been so disappointed in a story since I sat down with my husband in much anticipation to share with him a movie I had absolutely adored as a young woman -- Bell, Book, and Candle.  And what befell the heroine was so very terrible, and unjust and wrong, that I burst into tears.

And yet the story hadn't changed; I had changed.

What stories did you love, back years ago, that had changed when you came back to revisit them?

Originally posted to One Hand Clapping on Fri Jan 18, 2013 at 07:59 PM PST.

Also republished by Community Spotlight.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I have queued this to the group (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MsGrin, a gilas girl, Rolanni

    Readers and Book Lovers, btw.

    I'm not sure which books I read years ago that I would be disappointed by now.  Certainly the best works of Dickens remain wonderful -- particularly A Tale of Two Cities, but really most of his major works do not disappoint on rereading.

    OTOH, I still love Bell, Book & Candle too, so maybe there's something wrong with me. ;-D

    Nah: it has always been sad that she must become mortal if she falls in love.  It's ridiculous, imo, but it's part of the world-building of the play/movie.  That poignancy also points to how much in love she is with what's-his-name.

    Who doesn't deserve her, btw.

    To make the argument that the media has a left- or right-wing, or a liberal or a conservative bias, is like asking if the problem with Al-Qaeda is do they use too much oil in their hummus. Al Franken

    by Youffraita on Fri Jan 18, 2013 at 08:18:23 PM PST

    •  There are still books and movies... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      ...that I adore, even knowing that, really, I Ought To Know Better.  It's interesting in itself to note which carry the day on characterization or It, even though they were products of their day.  

      Bell, Book and Candle was a surprise.  I knew the story; I knew the rules of the story.  But when it came to paying up, my older self just wasn't convinced that giving up one's power for "love" was such a good deal.  It wasn't "romantic" anymore; it was cruel.

      Clearly, my worldview had changed.

      Thank you, for queuing the diary up to Readers and Books Lovers.

  •  Nice to see you around these parts… (0+ / 0-)

    Welcome aboard. Thought you might like to see a familiar face, so I am making one of my very intermittent posts, to wave and smile.

    Kelly McCullough - author of the WebMage series and the Fallen Blade books (Penguin/ACE)

    by KMc on Sat Jan 19, 2013 at 07:50:55 AM PST

  •  Your fantasy novels sound fascinating! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    steamed rice

    I love the idea of the Changing Land. And yes; in most fantasy worlds there does seem to be a certain stillness there has never been in our world. The society may be threatened by the rise of a Dark Lord or an invasion from beyond its borders or what have you, but up until now it has just chugged along very peacefully and uneventfully. Change is evil and change is feared. Stasis, and preserving that stasis, is good. This can especially be seen in Tolkien (where all the really beautiful parts of Middle-Earth are calm and peaceful and unchanged throughout centuries -- like the Shire and the Entwood and Lothlorien. And all the really evil places, like Mordor and Orthanc, are where Change is happening.)

    "We are stardust, we are golden, and we've got to get ourselves back to the garden." (Joni Mitchell) Join the Forward on Climate Rally on February 17!

    by Eowyn9 on Sat Jan 19, 2013 at 07:37:42 PM PST

  •  Interesting divergence (0+ / 0-)

    In much of the fantasy I've read lately, magic is the function of reality  being fluid and thus subject to a sufficiently strong and trained sapient will.  See especially White Wolf's World of Darkness games, particularly Mage: the Ascension.

    And yet Rolanni's Changing Land thesis is that magic is the function of reality NOT changing.

    Odd and yet interesting difference.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site