Skip to main content

Primarily in response to the re-election of America's first African-American President, there are nefarious, anti-black, anti-Hispanic, anti-Democracy, anti-voter...just plain anti-freedom election rigging schemes going on in virtually every state government controlled by Republicans.

One can only conclude that these crafty actions are designed to prevent the election of future Democratic presidential candidates and to keep white conservatives in power by any means necessary in the face of America's changing demographics.  In a nustshell, the GOP is trying to change our electoral process so that the white minority of the not-so-distant future can still pick America's Presidents.

GOP national and state leaders won't admit it, but in the aftermath of President Obama's resounding electoral college victory, most of them are probably scared shitless and feeling like hate monger Pat Buchanan, who left no doubt about the racist toad he is in an interview published the day after Election Day titled "Buchanan: ‘White America’ Died Last Night." (http://dailycurrant.com/...).

This excerpt from that article might as well be the GOP's manifesto/blueprint for the next year or two as it strives to limit democracy to a chosen few and stymie election fairness. I'm just surprised Buchanan was so open and honest about how he and so many in the GOP feel. Check out the crazy:

Conservative political pundit Pat Buchanan stoked controversy today by claiming that Barack Obama's re-election has "killed White America."

But the former Nixon advisor was more explicit on the G. Gordon Liddy Show this morning. When asked for his reaction to Obama's victory, Buchanan replied brazenly:
"White America died last night. Obama's reelection killed it. Our 200 plus year history as a Western nation is over. We're a Socialist Latin American country now. Venezuela without the oil."

Stunned by his clear racisim, Liddy tried to walk his guest back from the ledge:
"With what you just said right there...You seem to imply that white people are better than other people. That's not really what you're saying is it?"

"Of course that's what I'm saying," Buchanan replied "Isn't it obvious? Anything worth doing on this Earth was done first by white people."

"Who landed on the moon? White people. Who climbed Mount Everest? White people.  Who invented the transistor? White people. Who invented paper? White people. Who discovered algebra? White people."

"And don't give me all this nonsense about Martin Luther King and civil rights and all that. Who do you think freed the slaves? Abraham Lincoln. A white guy!"

"But we're not led by Lincoln anymore, we're led by an affirmative-action mulatto who can't physically understand how great America once was."

"I cried last night G. I cried for hours. It's over for all of us. The great White nation will never survive another four years of Obama's leadership."

Liddy tried to reason with Buchanan, reminding him that he shares similar positions with the President on Afghanistan, Iraq, and relations with Russia: "Of course I agree with half of what he does,"  Buchanan answered, "He's half white! That's not the half I'm worried about."

Yep, that Bozo was brazen enough to go on the record with that crap. But I'm glad he did because it puts on full display the insanity of Right Wing Nut Jobs that reasonable Americans who truly love this country have to confront and defeat.

Considering the mindset of Buchanan and those of his ilk, it's easy to understand how desperate the GOP is and why they're willing to stoop to anything to retain political power--even if it means installing an Apartheid-like election system that minimizes the voting power of non-white, non-Christian American citizens.

That desperation was manifested recently in Virginia, when on the day of President Obama's inauguration, the Virginia State Senate underhandedly passed a bill by a 20-19 vote that would redistrict the state’s senate seats. The vote would have been a tie if Democratic Senator Henry Marsh been present, but he was attending the inauguration.

Had Marsh been present, however, the state’s Lieutenant Governor, Democrat Bill Bolling, would probably have broken the tie and defeated the bill.

The Virginia gerrymandering bill now goes to the heavily Republican House of Delegates for a vote, where it will likely face little opposition.  If it passes, it could ultimately mean Virginia will be another "swing state" that could have its electoral split based on Congressional districts.

What Republicans are trying to do is reshape the political landscape in such a way that even if they lose popular vote, they still have a route to winning the White House, much like the way they won the U.S. House in 2012.

Even that tool Joe Scarborough admitted that the GOP cheated via Gerrymandering to keep control of the U.S. House, given that GOP candidates got 1.5 million less votes than Democratic candidates for House seats in 2012.  

Voter suppression efforts in 2012 in so-called swing states like Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio and Virginia failed to deliver those states to GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. This gerrymandering scheme appears to be Plan B.

So, how does this GOP scheme work? Here's an excerpt from a recent article by by Thom Hartmann and Sam Sacks from Truth-Out.Org (http://truth-out.org/...) that explains it:

The plan works like this: Instead of giving all of a state’s Electoral College votes to the popular vote winner of that state, Republicans want Electoral College votes in a small number of states to be doled out based on who won each Congressional district, plus two votes going to the popular vote winner.

Of course, those Congressional districts in several traditionally blue states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Michigan were drawn by newly-elected Republicans state legislatures after the 2010 census. And they were drawn in a way that already gives Republicans an advantage by carving up Democratic strongholds and creating “safe” Republican seats.

I'm not sure what if anything, other than legal action, can be done to stop the GOP from enacting its wicked, un-American agenda before the 2014 mid-terms. But we the people have to step and find a way. Otherwise, we might be looking at the preservation of "Pat Buchanan's America" for at least a couple of more generations.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Dude, the Daily Currant is a SATIRE site (9+ / 0-)

    Please, pull this diary before too many people see it. You did the equivalent of believing something from The Onion.

    •  o woopsie ! (0+ / 0-)

      well, kudos to the diarist for putting it succinctly in saying " apartheid" - that's just what they are trying to do.  And that's how we should frame it as we combat this shit.

      “Good things don’t come to those who wait. They come to those who agitate!” Julian Bond

      by Dvalkure on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 11:57:36 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  That's funny (0+ / 0-)

      cuz I could close my eyes & "hear" Pat Buchanan saying those things!

      "The light which puts out our sight is darkness to us." Thoreau

      by NancyWH on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 03:15:17 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  a correction (0+ / 0-)
    Had Marsh been present, however, the state’s Lieutenant Governor, Democrat Bill Bolling, would probably have broken the tie and defeated the bill.
    Bill Bolling appears to be a republican. The link indicates that he was lt. gov. concurrently with Democrat Tim Kaine, this is possible as the elections for the 2 offices are conducted separately. However, he is not a Democrat himself.
    If it passes, it could ultimately mean Virginia will be another "swing state" that could have its electoral split based on Congressional districts.
    While I am definitely concerned about the prospect of gerrymandered Presidential elections, it isn't clear to me how one necessarily follows from the other here.
    •  He is a Republican (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      scotths

      He is also, I believe, not a supporter of the bill, so he would have voted against it.  That's why they needed a Dem to be absent.

      There is truth on all sides. The question is how much.

      by slothlax on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 03:41:15 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  this is rather outragous (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        slothlax

        Isn't there some precedence of the sort of courtesy extended in these situations? I had been assuming that passed a bill that would have passed anyway on such a day mostly so that few would notice its passage.

        Can they really schedule a vote intentionally so as to produce a different results because someone was away at the time? Aren't the residents of that Senator's district entitled to representation?

        It is one thing to use parliamentary maneuvers to limit the oppositions ability to build support against a bill, to rush the bill through committee calling it an "emergency" and to pass the bill on a day in which most of the country isn't paying attention (as we've seen in many states over the past couple of years). However, to schedule a vote that they otherwise would have ultimately lost on a day when a member of the opposition is away crosses the line from bending the rules to ones favor to outright cheating!

         

        He is also, I believe, not a supporter of the bill, so he would have voted against it.  That's why they needed a Dem to be absent.
        •  Pretty underhanded, huh? (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          scotths

          I think that's why the Republican governor hasn't said he will sign it.  He understands the terrible optics of this kind of thing.

          While this is an extreme example, this sort of maneuver is not unprecedented.  But for the reasons of fair play that you cite, I think this is going to backfire big time.  Only the most partisan of voters will be behind the GOP on this sort of think, I think.

          There is truth on all sides. The question is how much.

          by slothlax on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 05:24:40 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site