Skip to main content

Bar graph showing that the percent of adults ages 40-59 who had a parent 65+ and were raising a minor child or supporting a grown child was 47 in 2012 and 45 in 2005. The percent who provided financial support to a parent 65+ and a child any age in the past year was 15 in 2012 and 12 in 2005.
The financial squeeze is a generational squeeze for many adults between the ages of 40 and 59, Pew reports. In that group, 47 percent have a parent aged 65 or older and are either raising a child under 18 or supporting a grown child, up from 45 percent in 2005. Meanwhile, in the past year, 15 percent of people in that group have provided financial support both to a parent aged 65 or older and to a child, whether a minor child they're raising or a grown child. That's up from 12 percent in 2005.

Going from 12 percent to 15 percent over seven years isn't a huge jump; it's the kind of number that could turn out to have been a blip from the recession. But if it's a trend that persists, it signals big trouble as the generations in a strong enough financial position to give help age out.

People are much more likely to say it's a responsibility to give financial help to aging parents who need it than to adult children who need it—yet people are more likely to be supporting their adult children than their aging parents:

Among those who have at least one living parent age 65 or older, roughly one-third (32%) say they have given their parent or parents financial support in the past year. [...]

Among adults ages 40 to 59 with at least one grown child, 73% say they have provided financial support in the past year. Among those ages 60 and older with a grown child, only about half (49%) say they have given that child financial support.

Why the disconnect between the responsibility people say they feel to their aging parents and their adult children and the levels at which they actually give money to parents and children? Quite possibly because the children are more likely to need the help. Lower-income people are more likely than higher-income people to be helping their aging parents and less likely than higher-income people to be helping their adult children, for instance, suggesting that when resources are strained, assistance does go to the people toward whom more responsibility is felt. Higher-income people, by contrast, are much more likely to be helping their grown kids. This isn't proof, but it's suggestive that, rather than being hypocrites who say they feel responsibility to their parents while actually helping their kids, middle-aged people are simply more likely to have kids than parents who need help.

That fits, too, with what we know about the direction of wages and the economy. Young adults are struggling to find work, let alone full-time work, still more full-time work with good pay and benefits. Not that the economy of recent years has been easy for everyone over 65, but many of them had the chance to get established before wages stagnated, or got their jobs during years when average working people still had a decent shot at a pension. That's a chance today's young adults haven't had and don't look likely to get, leaving them in a hole for years to come.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Fri Feb 01, 2013 at 10:00 AM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.


Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site