Skip to main content

So if I need a weapon to defend myself from the gubmint, and I'm allowed to own military weapons, then I need weapons actually capable of defending me from the government. If the Second Amendment really does guarantee the right to keep and bear military weapons, then I see no reason why I shouldn't be allowed to have a Davy Crockett Recoilless Rifle, which fires a W54 Nuclear Warhead:

I mean, if the government gets to have their own nuclear arsenal, why can't I have my own personal nuclear deterrent? Isn't it my second amendment right to take out several blocks of New York City with a nuclear device if I feel threatened by Bloomberg or the NYPD?

Don't I, as an American Citizen, have a god-given right to keep and bear my very own Nuclear Deterrent?

Or are there certain limits that we, as a society, should place on the arms that people are allowed to keep and bear?

And see, that's all we're talking about here. I don't think that the RKBA folks want me to have a Davy Crockett nuclear weapon. They already agree that there are certain weapons that people ought not have. They're just arguing about where we draw that line.

No one believes in the absolute, unlimited right to keep and bear arms anymore. Letting people pretend that they do is one of the reasons that we can't have a conversation about semi-automatic military style assault weapons.

Originally posted to Writing by Will McLeod: A Better World is Possible on Sun Feb 03, 2013 at 07:17 AM PST.

Also republished by notRKBA, Shut Down the NRA, and Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA).

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site