Skip to main content

For whatever reason I've long considered it a priori obvious that cop killers aren't taken alive.  Or when they are they die pretty quickly, like Ronnie L. White in 2009: http://www.cbsnews.com/...  I'm not sure where I learned it, nor do I think I necessarily consider it a terrible thing.  I grew up in the LA area, it might just be a local thought among a certain subculture.

So here's audio purported to be taken off a radio tuned in to the San Bernadino Sheriff Department's coordination team during the burning of the log cabin Dorner was in.  http://www.youtube.com/...  I don't know if it's legit.  The same words and phrases reported without citation yesterday appear in the audio from a fellow I believe was saying he heard it himself, one Mike King of UC Santa Cruz.  Mike studies police action and insurgency.  The article is at my favorite commie newsletter, here: http://www.counterpunch.org/...  You can get a lot of profoundly unusual views out of the editorials at counterpunch.  

I for one will not lose much sleep over the death of Chris Dorner.  But this could be a clear cut example where law enforcement lied to protect their own self interest.  There's been extensive documentation of police beating the crap out of unarmed people and then charging those people with assault.  So the question is this: why are people still convicted on police testimony?  I don't know a damn thing about audio or the people involved over in Big Bear.  Crowdsourcing the primary document...this audio.  If it's provably legit, and if people know about it, I think it might cut down on people convicted of crimes they didn't commit based on police testimony.  

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site