Skip to main content

When it comes to renewable energy, battling climate change and green jobs, Senator Mark Udall (D. CO) doesn't know when to quit:

http://durangoherald.com/...

Sens. Mark Udall and Michael Bennet introduced the Public Lands Renewable Energy Development Act in the last week, but it’s not this bill’s first time around the block.

It was first introduced in the 112th Congress but never came to the Senate floor for a vote. When the 112th Congress ended in January, the bill died with it.

But Udall and Bennet, along with several other bipartisan co-sponsors, resurrected it.

The bill would make it easier to begin renewable-energy projects on federal lands, according to a news release. - Durango Herald, 2/16/13

Here's a little more info on what the Public Lands Renewable Energy Development Act would do:

http://www.wildlifemanagementinstitute.org/...

The bill would move toward a leasing program for wind and solar energy projects on federal public land. Currently, such projects are managed using rights-of-way and special use permits that are non-competitive, encourage speculation and do not provide compensation for the use of these lands. In addition, agencies would be required to complete their environmental analysis—including the solar programmatic environmental impact statement (see related story)—and amend any land-use plans.

Under the pilot program, at least two solar and two wind locations would be available for lease under a competitive bidding process.  Within two years and after reviewing and assessing the success of the leasing program to make any necessary adjustments, the Department of the Interior (DOI) then would establish a permanent program.  The new leasing program would provide a consistent playing field for the renewable energy industry while ensuring a fair return to the American public for the industry’s use of these resources.

If enacted, the leasing program would mirror leasing programs for federal fluid minerals (oil, gas, coal bed methane and others), including a competitive lease sale and rental fees and royalties that are intended to bring “a fair return to the United States” for use of the land.  Twenty-five percent of revenues would be distributed to the county or counties in which a project is located, 25 percent to the state in which a project is located, 15 percent for a renewable energy permit processing fund for DOI (after 15 years, this revenue stream will be deposited into the conservation fund), and 35 percent to a fund for wildlife and land conservation and protection. - Wildlife Management Institute

The Public Lands Renewable Energy Development Act is also co-sponsored by Senators Jon Tester (D. MT), Dean Heller (R. NV), Max Baucus (D. MT), Martin Heinrich (D. NM), Jim Risch (R. ID) and Tom Udall (D. NM).  The act also has been endorsed by Taxpayers for Common Sense, the National Association of Counties, the Western Governors Association and the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership.  Here's what Udall and Bennet have to say about the bill:

http://www.markudall.senate.gov/...

"We in Colorado and across America are blessed with abundant wind, solar and geothermal resources that are ready to power our nation, create jobs and grow our economy. We should develop these resources in a responsible, sustainable way," Udall said. "That's why I joined a bipartisan group of my colleagues to introduce legislation to improve the way we develop and use the renewable energy resources on our public lands. By directing a portion of the revenues from these leases to state and local governments – as well as to conservation – this bill will help support our schools and rebuild infrastructure while conserving the land and water that our rural economies depend on."
"Colorado's renewable energy resources have made our state a national leader in developing a cleaner, more diverse energy portfolio." Bennet said. "This bill is a common-sense approach that will promote renewable energy, while also helping local communities safeguard their natural resources and grow their economies."

Currently, obtaining permits for solar and wind projects on public lands can take several years. The bill will reduce the number of steps required by law and make it easier for companies to make long-term plans. The changes will also increase local governments' revenue and certainty by establishing a more predictable and direct royalty system from renewables that will support conservation. - udall.senate.gov, 2/13/13

Udall has also remained vigilant in pushing other green energy initiatives through the Senate.  Udall remains committed to renewing the extension of the wind tax credit:

http://www.coloradoan.com/...

He is dusting off old arguments in favor of the wind production tax credit — which costs more than $10 billion a year — as he pushes for a three- to five-year renewal.

He faces even tougher odds this year because Congress is in a cost-cutting mood. The first phase of $1.2 trillion in spending cuts over 10 years will take effect March 1 unless Congress comes up with a plan to avert them.

The dire fiscal picture doesn’t change the fact that the industry needs more time to mature and stand on its own financial feet, Udall said in a recent interview.

And whatever money Congress spends on helping wind power compete against conventional fossil fuels like oil, gas and coal “is an investment in the future,” he said.

“That’s an investment in American-grown energy, that’s an investment in American manufacturing, and more importantly, that’s an investment in American jobs,” said Udall, who delivered more than 25 speeches on the Senate floor in the previous Congress, urging his colleagues to keep the credit alive. - The Coloradan, 2/15/13

Udall is also determined in getting the San Juan Mountains Wilderness Act:

http://www.telluridenews.com/...

Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) re-introduced the act, which would designate 33,000 new acres as wilderness, into the U.S. Senate for the third time on Thursday. Most of the new acreage would be expansions of the existing Lizard Head and Mt. Sneffels wilderness areas.

It would also establish a new area called McKenna Peak Wilderness in western San Miguel County and create the Sheep Mountain Special Management Area along the alpine ridge between San Miguel and San Juan counties, where existing uses, including heli-skiing, will be allowed to continue. Under the act, 6,600 acres would also be withdrawn from eligibility for mineral leasing in Naturita Canyon.

The bill has had a hard time navigating its way through Congress and has not made it through on either previous try. The legislation was first introduced in 2009 by then-Congressman John Salazar (D-Colo.) and as a companion Senate bill by Udall, but failed to pass in the 111th Congress. It was re-introduced in 2011 by Udall and Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), who is a co-sponsor, but it did not pass before the Congressional session ended.

In its current incarnation, the bill has been read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Local supporters are hoping this time will be different. - Telluride Daily Planet, 2/17/13

Most recently, Udall has also co-sponsored the reauthorization the National Integrated Drought Information System:

http://politicalnews.me/...

Mark Udall joined Senators Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), John Thune (R-S.D.) and Tom Udall (D-N.M.) in introducing bipartisan legislation to reauthorize the National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS), which provides vital drought information to farmers, ranchers and other industries affected by weather conditions. The NIDIS program is a function of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

"The effects of climate change and the severe ongoing drought are readily apparent in Colorado, where we have experienced lower crop yields, increased fire hazards and the lack of snowpack in the high country. Improving our ability to forecast droughts will help farmers, ranchers and everyone who relies on water to better prepare for droughts' devastating effects. That is why I support the bipartisan effort to reauthorize the National Integrated Drought Information System," Mark Udall said. "The National Integrated Drought Information System also is currently based in Boulder, taking advantage of Colorado's highly skilled workforce and supporting job creation in the area."

Since the NIDIS Act was signed into law, government agencies have worked to develop a long-term plan for drought prevention, research, and education. The Drought Information Act would extend this program for five years and support an interactive "early warning system" of timely and accurate drought information, as well an integrated weather monitoring and forecasting system. By increasing coordination with the USDA and private sector, this bill would also enhance the agriculture industry's involvement in the program. - Political News, 2/18/13

You have to give Udall credit for his continuous efforts to push through smart legislation that not only battles climate change but also promotes green jobs and smart conservation.  Even with an obstructionist GOP House, Udall refuses to give up.  Feel free to call Udall's office to thank him for his efforts and ask more about the pieces of legislation and how you can get your Senator and Congressman to back them:

202-224-5941

And if you're a Colorado resident, feel free to call any of his local offices:

Clark: 303-650-7820

Greeley: 970-356-5586

Grand Junction: 970-245-9553

Denver: 303-650-7820

Pueblo: 719-542-1701

Durango: 970-247-1047

Colorado Springs: 719-471-3993

Alamosa: 719-589-2101

Also, Udall is certainly going to be a big target by the oil industry in 2014.  You can help him secure his re-election bid by donating to his 2014 campaign:

https://secure.actblue.com/...

Originally posted to pdc on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 02:48 PM PST.

Also republished by In Support of Labor and Unions, Climate Hawks, The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party, and Colorado COmmunity.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (13+ / 0-)

    Funny Stuff at http://www.funnyordie.com/oresmas

    by poopdogcomedy on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 02:48:31 PM PST

  •  Yes, public lands should be used for (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    willyr, abarefootboy, FarWestGirl, 6412093

    renewable energy.  Absolutely.

  •  Can we stop enacting hatred of wilderness (5+ / 0-)

    out via policy?  I don't want our remaining grasslands and prairies turned into solar arrays any more than I want them to be mining developments.

    Governments care only as much as their citizens force them to care. Nothing changes unless we change -- George Monbiot.

    by Nulwee on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 03:01:10 PM PST

    •  I agree... What I want is a vertical windmill (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Nulwee, Mark Mywurtz, Leftcandid

      at my house. Paying one company over another to trample all over protected forest and range land is not my idea of progress.

      The day is coming when a single carrot, freshly observed, will set off a revolution. Paul Cezanne

      by MeToo on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 03:06:16 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Udall is a *huge* champion of wilderness (7+ / 0-)

      He has cosponsored innumerable wilderness protection bills, both when he was in the House and now the Senate. In particular, he's sponsored America's Red Rock Wilderness Act, which would protect over 9 million acres of public land in Utah. He's also been a cosponsor of bills to protect as wilderness the Arctic Refuge coastal plain, among other places.

      I fully agree with you that we need to be concerned about industrializing the landscape with energy projects, whether renewable or fossil fuel or nuclear. But there are some places where properly sited renewable energy projects are, in my mind, acceptable, but only if there is strict oversight.

      What is not acceptable are energy projects in wilderness quality lands, and this includes renewable energy and fossil fuels. There are millions of acres of non-wilderness public land that could be used for this purpose. But we need to save the true wilderness and other landscapes and treasures. This certainly includes grasslands and prairies.

      Resist much, obey little. ~~Edward Abbey, via Walt Whitman

      by willyr on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 04:01:43 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I was tempted to title this diary, CO-Sen: (0+ / 0-)

        Mark Udall (D), A.K.A. Captain Planet but I thought it would've been cheesy.  

        Funny Stuff at http://www.funnyordie.com/oresmas

        by poopdogcomedy on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 04:06:29 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  I am also concerned that this opens the lands (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        willyr

        up to additional fossil fuel development. If the RE folks can have land for their projects, why shouldn't we be able to drill the shit out of Canyons of the Ancients? [not that they're not doing so already].

        I know Udall's heart is in the right place on this, but how do we avoid the next 'logical' escalations?

        "I can't do it by myself. No president can. Remember: Change doesn't happen from the top. It happens because of you." B Obama, 2008

        by nzanne on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 04:13:28 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  How? Eternal vigilance (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          FarWestGirl, 6412093

          Well, eternal vigilance and the enactment of laws permanently protecting our natural resources and wild lands. And then enforcing the laws.

          Tough job. And it's not being done now in most places, that's for sure.

          Resist much, obey little. ~~Edward Abbey, via Walt Whitman

          by willyr on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 04:21:01 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  Renewables are non-destructive, nothing is (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          6412093

          removed, no waste or refuse. Just requiring all those things would let out extractive industries from the git go.

          Information is abundant, wisdom is scarce. ~The Druid.
          ~Ideals aren't goals, they're navigation aids.~

          by FarWestGirl on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 06:32:00 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Well ... (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            MGross, willyr

            renewable energy developers still tear the heck out of the lands where they're building, especially with lax federal oversight. Every site I snuck onto, I found  they ripped up lands outside their lease area, didn't reclaim bulldozed areas,  didn't try to follow the natural drainages, didn't install erosion control measures, didn't replant, left construction wastes, and so on.

            when I took the pictures to the federal lands managers they threatened to have me arrested for trespassing on public lands.

            Orly, it isn't evidence just because you downloaded it from the internet.

            by 6412093 on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 07:48:51 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

    •  Much of the eastern, windy CO Plains is rangeland (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      willyr, FarWestGirl, 6412093

      interspersed with farmland that is not really a candidate for pristine preservation.

      IMO windmills are one of the few forms of existing technology that can coexist well with an otherwise largely natural state of land.  Yeah, there needs to be installation, & a service road, but then the impact is minimal.  Compared to mining/logging impacts--tailings, deforestation, water pollution, etc.--wind is fairly friendly.  

      On solar arrays, I'm with you; those take up horizontal space & are more impactful.  Solar is more ideally distributed in private urban settings--an environment in which wind is more hit & miss--than in large arrays.

    •  Most of the large solar (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      MGross

      plants on public lands are not arrays of acres of solar panels, they are smaller facilities with mirrors that concentate the sun's rays. That said, they are still large industrial structures.  

      I favor this proposed legislation partly because our public lands in the West couldn't be managed much worse.

      Cogentrix, a coal fired power company, squatted on tens of thousands of acres of land leases for years, thwarting solar development in Nevada.

      Wind and solar plant approvals dragged on for years, even after Cogentrix got run off.

      Taxpayers deserve some revenue from these projects, since the developers are raking in Dept. of Energy loans, and alternative energy tax breaks.  Meanwhile billion-dollar gold mining operations still get federal land for free and don't pay any royalties.

      I treasure the grasslands and prairies on public lands too, but Nevada is a very big place, cut apart by a series of
      mountain ranges running kind of northeast-  southwest.

      If just one or two of those valleys between the ranges contained lots of wind and solar, and had industrial strength transmission lines, it could probably power most of the Southwest.  Then we could close some of those coal mines and their power plants on public land and reopen those areas to the public domain.

      I've visited many renewable planst and mining sites  on public lands throughout the West.  As other commentors said, there are millions of acres of well, prosaic, lands available that isn't wilderness or forest.

      Orly, it isn't evidence just because you downloaded it from the internet.

      by 6412093 on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 07:43:34 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Renewable energy siting bill -public lands (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        6412093

        This is what I find curious, why all the emphasis on public lands siting for energy projects? We have been told repeatedly that the private sector is always smarter, better, more efficient.  Private lands in the west tend to be much closer to point-of-use. That is an important consideration for electricity which has such high line loss. It seems obvious that brownfields redevelopment and other private development is probably better for society as a whole.
         Another thing to consider. Both FS and BLM are ridiculously underfunded. A bill that has them re-doing all their forest plans and RMP's to conform to these big projects in two years or less is going to take money and staff. Any bets that our congress is going to fund 'big government'? And if you say 'we can contract it out." I would say that contracting NEPA, FLPMA, NFMA ESA compliance will definitely jack up the price to astronomical levels.

  •  I'm really enjoying the conversation here in the (0+ / 0-)

    comments.  It's a very smart and interesting debate and I encourage you all to keep it up.  My only request is that you continue to keep it civil.  

    Funny Stuff at http://www.funnyordie.com/oresmas

    by poopdogcomedy on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 04:22:06 PM PST

  •  Good deal, I'll pass it on to my senators and see (0+ / 0-)

    if they'll sign on. Thanks for the heads up. :-)

    Information is abundant, wisdom is scarce. ~The Druid.
    ~Ideals aren't goals, they're navigation aids.~

    by FarWestGirl on Mon Feb 18, 2013 at 06:33:29 PM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site