Skip to main content

"The director of the Kansas Budget Division issued a public apology Monday for an errant spending statistic that Gov. Sam Brownback has used for months to claim credit for state spending cuts that never happened."

Former wingnut Senator, and current wingnut Governor, Sam Brownback (TP) Kansas has been touring his state with a PowerPoint presentation "proving" that he has "cut" his state's budget from its "all-time high", a number attributed to his Democratic predecessor, Mark Parkinson.  Problem is, none of that is true.

For a little more, flip past the fillip.

Gov. Brownback, on numerous occasions, has used a chart showing that state spending peaked at about $16 billion in 2010, the year before he took office. The actual spending that year was $14.04 billion.  A $2 BILLION difference;  about 14%.  This is not a rounding error, it is a HUGE difference.

What is the truth?  "....spending under the Brownback administration has been higher than it was under Parkinson, the opposite of what the chart showed."

Why is this a "lie", rather than just a simple "error"?  Gov. Brownback, according to the Director of the Kansas Budget Division, used the correct numbers when submitting his budget to the legislature.

The Budget Director, Steve Anderson, is falling on his sword on this issue, and much in the vein of Bush's "Heckuva job Brownie", Brownback has expressed his continued "full confidence" in him.  The guy that made a $2 billion error.

Because he only made one error, right?  Well, maybe not:

In addition to the overall spending number, the Sunday story in The Eagle also raised questions about a separate set of numbers the governor has used in his presentations, where he says that the state’s schools lack adequate fiscal discipline.
I guess that if the numbers don't match your agenda, then just change the numbers.  Its the GOP way!

The committee that has oversight on this issue doesn't meet until March 20th, but the Democrats on the committee are pissed

"“It’s gargantuan,” Senate Minority Leader Anthony Hensley, D-Topeka, said of the error. “I think it has a dire effect on their credibility. I feel like they’ve been fast and loose with the numbers since, well, ever since their administration started.”

Hensley, a member of the Legislative Post Audit Committee that can request probes of state agencies, said he plans to request an investigation of how the error occurred and went unnoticed. "

“I’ve never known of a budget director to have had to make an apology for this big of a mistake,” he said."

How are the people of Kansas reacting to the news?  Not well:
Ken Ciboski, a professor of political science at Wichita State University and a longtime participant in Republican politics, said he has been in contact with people around the state through social media since the story was published.

“Based on what I saw, I think people had a pretty negative reaction” to the error, Ciboski said.

“Very definitely I think there’s some dissatisfaction out there; especially in Johnson County, I’m hearing from people there.”

I guess those legislators didn't pray hard enough for those “dark spiritual areas” in the state that they actually started to believe the GOP's BS.
Ciboski said the numbers issue may have become a kind of focal point for more general concerns about Brownback and his plans to spur private-sector expansion and investment by cutting income taxes and reducing the size and reach of Kansas government.

The underlying issue is “When is all the great wonderful stuff that’s supposed to happen coming to fruition?” Ciboski said. “People have had some pretty grave doubts about that since the beginning.

There is a great, recent diary called, "Kansas Governor Rolls the Dice" Detailing just how radical Gov. Brownback's agenda is, and how much pain it will cause the average Kansan, and there are many very legitimate concerns about whether this is a good plan for the state, and if the numbers they are using are so wildly off-base, whether the people will be given the information they need to judge whether the pain they are experiencing is actually achieving the stated goals.

Unfortunately, as KansasLib so eloquently chronicled in "Alone in Kansas", this is a state that has been captured by FAUX "News" and the NRA, and the facts no longer seem to matter.

"However he (Ciboski) said that absent a major crisis, he doesn’t see Brownback losing any elections, because of the current conservative dominance of state politics."
And just because it bears repeating (lifted from tmservo433's diary":

Brownback Cartoon:

Brownback_Cartoon

Poll

Sam Brownback

100%63 votes
0%0 votes

| 63 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site