Skip to main content

In the summer of 2011 several journalists and bloggers wrote about the obvious dominionist views, history and involvements of several major Republican politicians -- notably Religious Right favorite, Gov. Rick Perry of Texas.  Dominionism (generally the idea that Christians of the correct sort, should dominate all aspects of society, including in politics and government) has been the main ideological engine of the Christian Right for decades, and continues to be more the case rather than less.  We should not have been surprised when the journalists and bloggers who had been writing about these things were the subject of a high profile smear campaign -- some of us by name, others of us by implication.

This profoundly animating, theocratic ideology cuts both ways for the Religious Right and aligned politicians. Dominionism has benefited the movement -- which aspires at once to religious transcendence, cultural control and political power.  But it is also controversial, even within evangelicalism, and rightly concerns people who believe in such basic civic values as respect for constitutional democracy, religious pluralism and separation of church and state -- not to mention reproductive rights and LGTB civil rights.

I mention this because denial about dominionism -- which in its way is as preposterous and pernicious as denial about climate change -- and the accompanying smear campaign, may very well repeat itself.  Major Republican figures like Rick Perry and Gov. Sam Brownback (R-KS), each have significant dominionist entanglements that may very well work both for and against them going into 2016. And they are probably not the only ones.  

As I look back, it was an extraordinary spectacle. The smear campaigners included (among others) columnists Ross Douthat at The New York Times; Michael Gerson at The Washington Post, Charlotte Allen at the Los Angeles Times, Mark Pinsky at USA Today, and Lisa Miller at The Washington Post.  Even liberal evangelical leader Jim Wallis piled on. It was an obviously choreographed effort to silence critics and journalists. Among the many things that happened, bloggers and journalists responded to the smear campaign with devastating critiques of the smear mongers --  Fred Clark (no relation) and Peter Montgomery, to name a few.   Among the many responses by my Talk to Action, colleagues, Rachel Tabachnick continued to demonstrate the reality and significance of dominionism, and I pointed out that mainstream Christian ministers have been writing about the dangers of dominionism for years.  

If past is prologue, elements of the punditocracy will get wound up and sprung on us as they were in 2011. Indeed, Chip Berlet pointed out that we saw pretty much the same smeary mix of personal attacks and denialism in 2005.

He also wrote a detailed essay in an effort to at once, explain dominionism, and rebut those who were either misunderstanding or mischaracterizing our work.  It may come in handy.  Here are excerpts from a shorter version:

Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin have all flirted with Christian Right Dominionism, but there's lots of misinformation about just what that means.

Dominionists want to impose a form of Christian nationalism on the United States, a concept that was dismissed as eroding freedom and democracy by the founders of our country. Dominionism has become a major influence on the right-wing populist Tea Parties as Christian Right activists have flooded into the movement at the grassroots.

At the same time, legitimate questions have been raised about whether or not potential Republican presidential nominees Rick Perry, Michelle Bachmann, or Sarah Palin have moved from a generic form of Christian Right Dominionism toward the more totalitarian form know as Dominion Theology.

Clueless journalists and crafty Christian Right pundits have mocked the idea that Dominionism as a religiously motivated political tendency even exists. Scholars, however, have been writing about Dominionism for over a decade, some using the term directly, and others describing the tendency in other ways.

Dominionism is a broad political impulse within the Christian Right in the United States. It comes in a variety of forms that author Fred Clarkson and I call soft and hard. Fred and I probably coined the term "Dominionism" back in the 1990s, but in any case we certainly were the primary researchers who organized its use among journalists and scholars.

Clarkson noted three characteristics that bridge both the hard and the soft kind of Dominionism.


    Dominionists celebrate Christian nationalism, in that they believe the United States once was, and should again be, a Christian nation. In this way, they deny the Enlightenment roots of American democracy.
    Dominionists promote religious supremacy, insofar as they generally do not respect the equality of other religions, or even other versions of Christianity.
    Dominionists endorse theocratic visions, believing that the Ten Commandments, or "biblical law," should be the foundation of American law, and that the U.S. Constitution should be seen as a vehicle for implementing Biblical principles.
At the apex of hard Dominionism is the religious dogma of Dominion Theology, with two major branches: Christian Reconstructionism and Kingdom Now theology. It is the latter's influence on the theopolitical movement called the New Apostolic Reformation that has been linked in published reports to potential Republican presidential nominees Perry, Bachmann or Palin. All three of these right-wing political debutantes have flirted with Christian Right Dominionism, but how far they have danced toward the influence of hard-right Dominion Theology is in dispute. It would be nice if some "mainstream" journalists actually researched the question.

Originally posted to Street Prophets on Sat Feb 23, 2013 at 08:16 PM PST.

Also republished by Abortion.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Pat K California, Kestrel, Alumbrados, Superskepticalman, DeminNewJ, vicki, hester, ogre, teacherken, AaronInSanDiego, native, Danno11, theboz, Emerson, Shockwave, Fishgrease, Sherri in TX, Pescadero Bill, Wintermute, Andrew C White, cotterperson, celdd, Mnemosyne, Pompatus, xynz, devtob, Addison, alain2112, scribe, missLotus, EricS, wonkydonkey, annrose, susakinovember, whenwego, CoolOnion, phillies, roses, sngmama, splashy, Cedwyn, antirove, Alna Dem, hopeful, sidnora, wader, figbash, pat bunny, Noodles, Boppy, roseeriter, Catte Nappe, liberte, RebeccaG, lcrp, dkmich, bwintx, FlyingToaster, AllisonInSeattle, zett, Major Kong, zerelda, glattonfolly, randallt, Deward Hastings, homogenius, eve, rolet, bibble, Armand451, oortdust, Ohkwai, Crazycab214, A Citizen, jabney, marina, radarlady, Hoomai29, PDiddie, Ckntfld, qofdisks, Chinton, democracy inaction, irate, Militarytracy, Alice Venturi, elkhunter, ChemBob, YucatanMan, Dobber, ratzo, eru, PSzymeczek, bleeding blue, SaraBeth, Sara R, Sandino, kaliope, WisePiper, Ginny in CO, mph2005, Rogneid, Ekaterin, begone, Mother Mags, martini, snazzzybird, Orinoco, Kingsmeg, cybersaur, tonyahky, ruleoflaw, deha, Naniboujou, arlene, fou, raincrow, blueoasis, jeff bryant, triv33, philipmerrill, jerseyjo, ER Doc, Unitary Moonbat, doinaheckuvanutjob, CA Nana, Clive all hat no horse Rodeo, WarrenS, blueoregon, shaharazade, NancyWH, slksfca, Aaa T Tudeattack, cpresley, old wobbly, Sapere aude, fabucat, BeninSC, Habitat Vic, ninkasi23, devis1, Da Rat Bastid, linkage, DvCM, DWG, sfbob, joedemocrat, GMFORD, SeaTurtle, Bronx59, carpunder, yella dawg, gizmo59, Mighty Ike, rogerdaddy, gundyj, Amor Y Risa, spacejam, Arlys, Tchrldy, bythesea, elwior, skohayes, Its any one guess, tofumagoo, Cassandra Waites, bluesheep, carver, 3rdOption, luckylizard, Parthenia, Executive Odor, HarpboyAK, rodentrancher, Mayfly, HoosierDeb, Ellid, maggiejean, Throw The Bums Out, Neon Vincent, spacecadet1, ARS, emboyo, Carol in San Antonio, Zotz, petral, stevenwag, Leftcandid, LookingUp, Larsstephens, BlueOak, kayhag, commonmass, Christy1947, David PA, Eddie L, cordgrass, addisnana, orlbucfan, kenwards, fiercefilms, Glass Navel, kerflooey, Bluefin, Oldowan, StateofEuphoria, pb3550, bluekokoro, sostos, implicate order, Teknocore, Nicci August, mrsgoo, Ojibwa, midnight lurker, wintergreen8694, peregrine kate, VTCC73, Marihilda, joanbrooker, DRo, googie, Mentatmark, Mortifyd, No one gets out alive, IowaBiologist, SuWho, AnnetteK, quill, chmood, Cordyc, anodnhajo, Voiceless, Williston Barrett, Siri, Lonely Texan, pimutant, a2nite, ProvokingMeaning, 2thanks, JGibson, CA ridebalanced, Horace Boothroyd III, Lorinda Pike, Syoho, Laiane, Buckeye54, Margd, rat racer, PowWowPollock, FrY10cK, wasatch, katiec, surreal times, peptabysmal, Robynhood too, The Geogre, Canis Aureus, Captain Chaos, Ray Pensador, Chaddiwicker, Panama Pete, weck, unfangus, Alhambra, echedgar, mpm509, Jeff Murdoch, paccoli, howabout, northerntier, Icicle68, Smoh, nice marmot, ET3117, k9kiki, tampaedski, Ishmaelbychoice, pragmaticidealist, Jim Domenico, Jim Tietz, sparkysgal, Kombema, Havoth, Munynn, footNmouth, eagleray, sensetolisten

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site