Skip to main content

    Habemus papem. Well, the Catholics do, and he seems to be a great choice. Humble, down-to-earth, seemingly a really nice guy. However, as much as I would like to predict a successful pontificate, I can't. There's one thing about Francis I that's doomed to failure from the start, and I don't mean this in any way as a criticism of him personally. It's his message. "The new pontiff named himself after the humble Catholic friar St. Francis of Assisi. President Barack Obama hailed the new leader of the world's 1.2 billion Catholics as a 'champion of the poor.'" Yahoo news.
     Rooting for the poor? This is definitely NOT the message for the House of Representatives these days. As a matter of fact, there is an ambivalent feeling among most of us that there must be something fundamentally wrong with poor because, after all, if I made it, why can't everyone else? If you don't believe me, ask Mitt Romney about the 47%.
      So Francis I doesn't believe anything like that, just like many Americans. But Francis may have done a little more thinking than we did. Maybe he found out that in the present system we've put together, the deck is so baldly rigged that it's better to just let the poor get flushed down the drain, as long as somebody can come out ahead on the deal.

    This may account for the opposition to Obama's health plan. More people getting better care may mean lower profits for the pharmaceutical companies. Continuing a "divinely inspired" opposition to things like the Death with Dignity Act in Oregon may mean higher profits for homes where people sometimes spend years living like vegetables while draining the bank accounts of their loved ones. I'm anxious to see where Francis comes down on this.
     The main objection to Francis' message about loving the poor is that they just don't "contribute." In the good old USA, everyone has to pull their weight - unless you can get somebody else to do it. How can you make money out of people who have no money?
     Poor people are noted for, among other things, an unwillingness to spend large sums of money on crap. That is, except for the crap they're forced to eat because they can't afford anything else. Large firms have come up with all kinds of highly profitable items that contain  "empty calories" to fill cash registers rather than basic nutritional needs. This may be why the Republican budget of Eric Cantor, Paul Ryan and most of the other well-fed members of the majority cut the snot out of school lunches, childhood health care and early education while preserving anything remotely connected with the military, including billion-dollar programs the brass says it doesn't even want. Francis would be against that.
     The new pope said, while in Argentina, that much of the poverty in that country was caused by multinational corporations. That message would go over like a turd in a punchbowl if said in the hallowed halls of a Republican caucus - or maybe even in some Democratic ones. How can goodness be identified with poverty? Everyone knows that success can only be measured by the bottom line. Ask The Donald.
     What Francis was saying, I feel, was the same kind of message presented once before by a poor carpenter who threw money changers out of temples. Both of them despised the rigged deck that passed as economics in their time. Then, the pharisees and the priests controlled the deck along with the army. Now, we have "too big to fail."
     Poor? You're kidding, Francis. After all, we don't have lepers here and the prostitues  can go to jail unless they're celebrities. Everything's just fine. Look at the stock market. The Bible says you can't serve God and Mammon. The big money's on Mammon.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site