Skip to main content

So last Thursday, I wrote about the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing on the dangers drone technology could have on our privacy and civil liberties:

Targeted killings have made drones controversial, but a new class of tiny aircraft in the United States — cheap, able and ubiquitous — could engage in targeted snooping that existing laws are inadequate to address, witnesses and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee said in a hearing on Wednesday.
Readers’ Comments

The drones, or unmanned aerial systems, have already helped the police find missing people and county planners measure the growth of a landfill. But they could also be used by drug dealers, pedophiles and nosy neighbors, the witnesses and a senator said.

Surveillance by government is limited by the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and snooping by corporations and individuals is covered by privacy law and common law. But these were not written with drones in mind. The issue has taken on new urgency as the Federal Aviation Administration prepares to set forth rules for drones’ commercial use and as prices for the aircraft drop. Many states are considering legislation, but Congress is only beginning to consider the problem.

“There’s very little in American privacy law that would limit the use of drones for surveillance,” said one witness, Ryan Calo, an assistant professor at the University of Washington School of Law. “Drones drive down the cost of surveillance considerably. We worry that the incidence of surveillance will go up.” - New York Times, 3/20/13

In my diary, I called for members of the Senate to start drafting legislation to keep drones from invading our privacy.  Senator Mark Udall (D. CO) is doing just that:

Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) announced that he’s working on legislation to protect privacy rights against the use of private drone operators.

"I am working to finalize legislation that will respond to the concerns of Coloradans who want to ensure that there are common-sense safeguards to protect them from the improper use of drones," Udall said in a press release Monday.

Udall said that the private sector industry for domestic drones would be good for U.S. jobs and the economy but that federal privacy protections have not kept pace with the new technology developments.

“Private sector drones and unmanned aerial systems could positively reshape numerous industries and efforts, from search-and-rescue operations to agriculture and local TV news,” Udall said. “But the only way to truly embrace these innovative, job-creating technologies, is to assure the public that these technologies will not compromise Coloradans' basic privacy rights.” - The Hill, 3/26/13

Udall's announcement comes after the Senate Judiciary Committee heard advocates and critics of speeding drone technology:

Senate Armed Services Committee members Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., questions former Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel, President Barack Obama's choice for defense secretary, on Capitol Hill in Washington,  Thursday, Jan. 31, 2013, during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Hagel's nomination. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
The Federal Aviation Administration estimates there could be as many as 30,000 unmanned aerial vehicles in U.S. airspace within the next decade. Udall is committed to ensuring that emerging technologies such as private drones do not infringe on constitutional rights or threaten the personal safety of Americans.

Legislation Congress passed last year recognized the need for reasonable regulations to responsibly drive the unmanned aerial systems market, proposing as a first step the establishment of six unmanned aerial systems test sites across the country. An alliance of organizations and businesses in Colorado is preparing to submit an application to the FAA for one of the six unmanned aerial systems test sites, an effort Udall supports. -, 3/25/13

Here's what Udall is aiming for in his legislation:

AURORA,CO--OCTOBER 17TH 2009--Congressman, Mark Udall, during the 9News/Denver Post Health Care Forum, "Your Health, Your Congress, your Voice," began at the Anschutz Medical Campus Saturday afternoon. Andy Cross, The Denver Post
According to Udall's statement, current privacy safeguards at the state and federal levels "have not kept pace with the technology's capabilities." His legislation would "update safeguards to protect Americans from being surveilled by private drone operators without their consent, addressing concerns raised by his constituents while helping to head off possible legal problems for an emerging and potentially important industry for Colorado."

In a recent report, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International claimed the domestic drone industry could create as many as 70,000 new jobs and $13.6 billion in economic growth in just three years -- if federal and state regulations are not too onerous. - Huffington Post, 3/25/13

Udall has a terrific record on civil liberties.  I wrote about it here:

I trust Udall in drafting legislation that will prohibit drone technology from violating our civil liberties and privacy.  I look forward to his legislation.  If you'd like to donate to Udall's 2014 campaign so he can continue to fight to protect our civil liberties, please donate to his 2014 re-election campaign:

DENVER, CO - OCTOBER 04:  Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) speaks at a campaign rally for U.S. President Barack Obama at Sloan's Lake Park on October 4, 2012 in Denver, Colorado. Obama spoke the morning after the first Presidential debate at the University of Denve

Originally posted to pdc on Wed Mar 27, 2013 at 02:10 PM PDT.

Also republished by The Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party and Colorado COmmunity.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site