Skip to main content

Wayne LaPierre being rudely interrupted by reality
"Keep guns out of the hands of criminals" eh?
The Hill reported yesterday on this, and since I haven't spotted it here yet, seems worth mentioning. The Senate's package of stronger gun laws includes straw purchasing of guns -- specifically, making it a federal crime, a tougher new law to crack down on one of the methods criminals use to acquire guns.

And so naturally the NRA is demanding that this legislation be changed, making it harder on law enforcement and easier on the straw purchasers. Because you know, they're all about keeping guns out of the hands of criminals, except when the NRA chooses to defend the criminals.

So, this is what's happening to the first legislative measure that passed muster in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Increased penalties on straw purchases of guns sailed through the Senate Judiciary Committee and looked like a safe bet to win Senate approval even as other provisions — including the expanded background checks that remain a goal for gun control supporters — ran into trouble.

Now the straw-purchasing bill could be in danger because of NRA demands to change the language so law enforcement officials would have to prove that a straw purchaser intended to commit a crime or further the commission of a crime by buying a gun for someone else.

This was the first one out; this was the one proposal that actually picked up a vote from a Republican, Chuck Grassley (R-IA). But he's now on record not supporting the bill he voted for.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) fails to impress
“I voted for the trafficking bill in the Judiciary Committee, but it was far from a perfect piece of legislation,” Grassley said.“At the time, I explained that there were changes that needed to be made before I would support it on the floor.”
Senator Grassley hasn't said what changes he is looking for, perhaps because he hasn't received his instructions from the NRA as of yet. Since he's made his opposition clear against background checks and an assault weapons ban, however, Grassley's vote for the eventual legislative package is looking like a 'no' right now. As it happens, I know the phone number for Senator Grassley's Washington office is (202) 224-3744, and he's on Facebook and Twitter @ChuckGrassley.

As for the NRA, they're busy trying to make it tougher for this crime to stick, and they're even trying to take out a provision to confiscate the guns and ammo of convicted straw buyers. Even those who manage to get convicted of this crime -- should any aspect of that survive the NRA's assault and become law -- even those convicted and facing 25 years in prison ought not have their guns taken away, according to the NRA.

On the one hand it's ridiculous, outrageous; and yet for the NRA, this seems natural for them, expected. This is the NRA's predictable response to any stricter gun law: opposition. Even when they say they want to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. That's proven false by this; they're shown (yet again) to be liars and hypocrites. Their only interest here is the facilitation of gun sales. And they achieve this new low after being caught defending domestic abusers, and defending felons from being disarmed. So, again, it's only natural that the NRA would fight for straw purchasers as well.

Even the gunmakers ought to be ashamed of the NRA's spirited defense of criminal straw purchasing of their products, but I expect not a peep of protest from them. And their silence gives consent.

Originally posted to The Tytalan Way on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 10:32 AM PDT.

Also republished by Shut Down the NRA and Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA).

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site