Skip to main content

David Horowitz has let us know, once again, that his (and my) alma mater, Columbia University, is an erupting septic tank of lefty terrorism in which free discourse is suppressed and students must toe the line of socialist correctness. The reason this time: Columbia's School of Social Work has hired Kathy Boudin as an adjunct professor.

For those who didn't know (like me), or don't care (granted, also like me), Boudin is a former member of the Weather Underground and a participant in the 1981 Brinks Robbery, in which two police officers and a Brinks guard were murdered. Like Horowitz, Boudin grew up in a household with strong Communist affiliations. Unlike him, she remained with the Crazy Left instead of sprinting toward the Crazy Right. After she was (rightly) put in prison at Bedford Hills in 1981, she spent the next 25 years know...trying to help people. She helped create a program for teens whose mothers were in jail; a parental education class for inmates who were mothers; an adult literacy program; an AIDS/Women's health program; and a college education program. She also earned a Masters Degree in Adult Education, and won an international PEN Prize for her poetry. And after 22 years, she was granted parole in 2003. She earned a doctorate in Education from Columbia University's Teachers College in 2004. And then Columbia's School of Social Work - gasp! - hired her as an adjunct professor.

Now let's be clear. Adjunct professors are the temp workers of academia. They don't have tenure. They don't have benefits. They don't participate in the administration and they generally can't do research. They represent the university that hires them about as accurately as busboys represent the cooking at Le Cirque.

Horowitz also claims that that "the prestige of Columbia derives from its scientific and professional divisions" and not from Columbia's undergraduate program, which no longer holds to "Enlightenment values" and open debate. That's simply untrue. Columbia College is one of the top five in the nation (as ranked by US News & World Report). And as an alum, I can say with confidence that CU didn't get that undergraduate ranking because of its ivy-covered campus, incredible parties, or world-class athletes. It came from the quality of Columbia's education, which includes the Core Curriculum: two solid years of Great Books requirements, generally taught in seminars that demand open debate.

But for Horowitz, that doesn't matter. In his mind, it's still 1968 at Columbia. The Strawberry Revolution is in full swing, Mark Rudd is running through the steam tunnels, and long-haired hippies are still chanting "Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh! NVA is gonna win!"

I went to Columbia 20 years after the riots. I remember plenty of DepĂȘche Mode, lots of clove cigarettes, and sophomores making a point of wearing sweatshirts from other universities. What I don't remember was Marxist theory "rammed down students' throats," as Horowitz so visually puts it. Marx was included in the Core Curriculum, true; but so were Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Hume, Machiavelli - and Adam Smith. In fact, there was a distinct drop in class attendance in the time we dealt with Marx, because (along with Heidegger and Hegel) most of us found poor Karl to be thoroughly indigestible - especially in a pre-10:00 AM seminar.

In order to convince the reader that Columbia is Moscow on Morningside, Horowitz produces only two examples: Boudin, and Nicholas de Genova, who despicably prayed for the deaths of American soldiers in Iraq. But neither was ever anything but an adjunct professor; and Horowitz neglects to mention the University's official condemnation of de Genova, and the fact that de Genova no longer even teaches at Columbia (and made the remarks a decade ago).

I'm not a fan of political violence. I'd be perfectly happy if Kathy Boudin hadn't made parole. But after two decades, she did. That's how the system works in America. The administration at the School of Social Work - not the College - looked at Boudin's past and saw that she had spent twenty years running social programs for female prison inmates while she herself was incarcerated, and then hired her as a contract worker. Maybe that's not quite as Horowitz-friendly an outcome as not hiring Boudin at all; but it's hardly a Columbia-wide endorsement of the Weather Underground.

This isn't 1968. It isn't the Reagan Years. And if Boudin still belongs in prison, there are quite a few members of the former US administration who should be keeping her company in there, and are instead installed in cushy tenured positions in American academia. >Cough< torture memos >cough<.

Time to move on.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Horowitz can't move on (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    milkbone, MrJayTee, spacecadet1

    He was an intellectually dishonest, vitriolic faux radical when he was  on the Left and he remains an intellectually dishonest, vitriolic faux radical now that he is on the Right

    Nothing human is alien to me.

    by WB Reeves on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 12:56:00 PM PDT

  •  Horowitz was on a roll 20 years ago (0+ / 0-)

    and searching the archives, you will find he exerted whatever power or influence he had to the fullest extent.  However he is learning the sad lesson that those who remained on the Left learned long ago: be careful what you preach lest you become your own prophecy.

    For example, the mantra "Don't trust anyone over 30" did not work so well when the revolutionaries hit 30 themselves and trying to reset the number did not work for younger comrades.  

    Horowitz represents what I would call the Old Guard Extreme Right, still honoring Tailgunner Joe and hunting for commies under every bed.  He is not relevant to the radical right of the day as they distrust education of any sort and see scant need of it themselves.  His peers have either changed their message or else recognized they are superannuated and quietly bow out.  Leave it to David to realize his imagined legions of conservative students either don't exist or else are too busy scrambling for tuition to waste time Red baiting, except for a privileged, deluded few

  •  Exactly so. (0+ / 0-)
    And if Boudin still belongs in prison, there are quite a few members of the former US administration who should be keeping her company in there, and are instead installed in cushy tenured positions in American academia.
    But then, hypocrisy is the mother's milk of conservatism.

    I first set foot on the Columbia campus in 1979, eleven years after the protests. Never mind Marxist indoctrination, I was one of only a handful of students involved in any kind of leftist activity, going so far as to join an off-campus socialist activist organization.  There were damn few of my fellow students there, or in any other leftist outfit I knew of.

    I do, however, remember Art Hum/Lit Hum/Music Hum/Contemporary Civilization, the mostly bored grad students who taught them, the grocery under Furnald Hall, the nude sauna (also under Furnald?), the cinder block tedium of Carman Hall...a thousand little things.  Oh, and the wonderful Inge Halpert, my advisor.

    And not a single one related to leftist indoctrination (though I had my suspicions about Frau Halpert).  I did manage to get into the tunnels and nose around a bit--they weren't as tight about access in those days.  No bomb-throwers hanging out there, either.

    Columbia has been an outpost of the establishment for almost every minute of its existence.

    Thanks for the diary, AT.

    Cutting Social Security will end my support for the Democratic Party.

    by MrJayTee on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 02:32:57 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site