Skip to main content

Despite receiving a smattering of pressure from the right for attacking President Obama's Social Security cut proposal, Rep. Greg Walden, the head of the House GOP's campaign committee, is standing by his criticism of the president's budget as a "shocking attack on seniors."

In a statement provided to MSNBC's Chuck Todd, Walden's office says:

Chairman Walden supports the budget passed by House Republicans that preserves and protects Medicare and Social Security while also balancing the budget in 10 years. He disagrees with President Obama's political plan that hurts current seniors just so he can pay for more wasteful spending.
Yesterday, Walden said he opposed the Obama budget because by cutting Social Security for current seniors, it was "trying to balance the budget on the backs of seniors." Given that Republicans have been demanding Social Security cuts, including chained CPI, Walden's comments were cynical, but more importantly they were premature and politically dumb.

As I argued earlier, if Walden were brighter, he'd have waited for Democrats to line up in support of cutting Social Security. But by jumping the gun and launching the GOP's attack before any votes have been cast, Walden is giving Democrats all the warning they need to steer clear of supporting Social Security cuts. And now that Walden has made it clear that supporting Social Security cuts won't just create political problems from the left but also the right, congressional Democrats should be clamoring for this proposal to come to the floor—so they can vote against it.

Originally posted to The Jed Report on Thu Apr 11, 2013 at 06:54 AM PDT.

Also republished by Social Security Defenders and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site