Skip to main content

That is the conclusion of Firearm Justifiable Homicides and Non-Fatal Self-Defense Gun Use, a new study just release by the Violence Policy Center that is subtitled "An Analysis of Federal Bureau of Investigation and National Crime Victimization Survey Data."

The report analyzes national data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program’s Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) and the Bureau of Justice Statistics' National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS).

In an email sent out by Josh Sugarman, executive director of the Violence Policy Center and co-author of the study, he quotes from the study that

“The idea that ordinary citizens need access to extraordinary firepower in order to adequately defend themselves against criminals has become the default argument against a federal assault weapons ban and limits on high-capacity  ammunition magazines.   This new data exposes the fallacy of such arguments and clearly demonstrates that the frequency with which guns are used in self-defense in the real world has nothing in common with pro-gun assertions that firearms are used millions of times each year to kill criminals or stop crimes.  In fact, a gun is far more likely to be stolen than used in self-defense.”
Please keep reading.

Since receiving the email from Sugarman, I have quickly read through the study, which is only 19 pages.

Let me first offer a bit of what he emphasizes in the email as "key finding" -

I will list the summaries of the findings first:  

Firearm Justifiable Homicides by Private Citizens Occur Rarely

Firearms are Rarely Used in Self-Defense by Victims of Attempted or Completed Violent Crimes

Firearms are Rarely Used in Self-Defense by Victims of Attempted or Completed Property Crimes

Total Number of Actual Self-Defense Firearm Uses are Only a Small Fraction of Pro-Gun Claims

More than a Third of Persons Shot and Killed in Justifiable Homicides in 2010 Were Known to the Shooter

The study provides substantial detail to back up each of those assertions.  Since the study is not all that long, I will not go through all of the details.  But consider just this, from the email, for the first of the points listed above (copying from the email):

For victims of both attempted and completed violent crimes, for the five-year period 2007 through 2011 in only 0.8 percent of these instances did the intended victim in resistance to a criminal engage in a self-protective behavior that involved a firearm.  For the five-year period 2007 through 2011, the National Crime Victimization Survey estimates that there were 29,618,300 victims of attempted or completed violent crimes.  During this same five-year period, only 235,700 of the self-protective behaviors involved a firearm.  Of this number, it is not known what type of firearm was used or whether it was fired or not.  The number may also include off-duty law enforcement officers who use their firearms in self-defense.
Remember, this study is based on FBI data.

It clearly gives the lie to the assertions made by the NRA and others on this subject in the attempt to foment fear to prevent meaningful regulations on guns.

Here is the conclusion, which is worth remembering:  

The idea that firearms are frequently used in self-defense is the primary argument that the gun lobby and firearms industry use to expand the carrying of firearms into an ever-increasing number of public spaces and even to prevent the regulation of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.  Yet this argument is hollow and the assertions false.  When analyzing the most reliable data available, what is most striking is that in a nation of more than 300 million guns, how rarely firearms are used in self-defense.

Originally posted to teacherken on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 08:36 AM PDT.

Also republished by Repeal or Amend the Second Amendment (RASA) and Shut Down the NRA.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Bob Johnson, Chi, Upper West, copymark, PeterHug, Emerson, Wintermute, LuvSet, bilge, RFK Lives, gjohnsit, goObama, TrueBlueDem, alain2112, 88kathy, teresahill, CatFelyne, snoopydog, roses, kharma, psnyder, Damnit Janet, Steven D, lyvwyr101, Leaves on the Current, vacantlook, rapala, radarlady, shagnaski, ichibon, geruta, Tonedevil, sc kitty, Simplify, YucatanMan, Dobber, Laurence Lewis, FutureNow, eru, Beetwasher, Sandino, rb608, Eileen B, Alan Arizona, Blue Bronc, Oye Sancho, We Shall Overcome, lgmcp, esquimaux, detroitmechworks, Keone Michaels, myboo, cybersaur, Gorette, technomage, blueoasis, MJ via Chicago, The Hindsight Times, JVolvo, armadillo, MBNYC, democracy is coming, CA Nana, doingbusinessas, Ian Reifowitz, AllanTBG, Eryk, tegrat, john07801, BeninSC, Loudoun County Dem, Stwriley, Matt Z, sfbob, Wreck Smurfy, skod, Ralphdog, TomP, mconvente, iglarmobley, Johnny Nucleo, mamamedusa, Youffraita, Foundmyvoice, elwior, jamess, glendaw271, petulans, OrdinaryIowan, JBL55, Celtic Merlin, MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel, Glacial Erratic, greengemini, divineorder, TheFern, WakeUpNeo, rbird, davespicer, Words In Action, ruscle, Botopdawg, rb137, FogCityJohn, willynel, gramofsam1, Anima, mookins, NM Ray, samanthab, anonevent, cocinero, Oh Mary Oh, nosleep4u, slice, coquiero, OhioNatureMom, CoExistNow, trumpeter, marleycat, sethtriggs, MRA NY, randomfacts, stevie avebury, blue aardvark, Miggles, Laurel in CA, Mathazar, livingthedream, anodnhajo, sow hat, a2nite, MartyM, doroma, oldpotsmuggler, Noddy, Victim of Circumstance, Glen The Plumber, George3, Greatwyrm, Sue B, Hugh Jim Bissell, Chaddiwicker, Dr Erich Bloodaxe RN, SheilaKinBrooklyn, Ree Zen, knitwithpurpose, Jollie Ollie Orange, JerryNA, Icicle68, Smoh, rigcath, LilithGardener, Jason Hackman, anana, Dodgerdog1, SquareSailor

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site