Skip to main content

Two weeks ago, Texas Governor Rick Perry announced his state would forego billions of dollars in expanded federal Medicaid funding that could help provide health insurance for 1.5 million of his lower-income residents. Rejecting an estimated $90 billion over the next decade for his 46th ranked health care system, Perry declared that "Texas will not be held hostage to the Obama administration's attempt to force us into this fool's errand."

As it turns out, Governor Perry has a different errand in mind for Texas' share of the money that could have dramatically reduced the ranks of the quarter of Lone Star State residents without coverage. As he explained on Monday, Perry instead wants a new $1.6 billion business tax cut package--even if he has to tap the state's rainy day fund to pay for it.

Just two years ago, Texas faced a $27 billion deficit in its biennial budget, one-third of which was resulted "from a 2006 property tax reduction that was linked to an underperforming business tax." Now thanks to a booming energy sector, the Lone Star state is flush with new tax revenue. As the Houston Chronicle explained, Rick Perry has big plans for the estimated $8.8 bill surplus and the Texas Rainy Day Fund forecast to hit $12 billion by 2015:

Perry's proposal, which he unveiled at news conference at the Austin Chamber of Commerce, would cut the franchise tax rate by 5 percent. It also would broaden the current exemption for businesses that gross $1 million or less. Instead, there would be a $1 million deduction for businesses that make under $20 million. In addition, businesses that relocate to Texas could deduct their moving costs.
As Bloomberg Businessweek reported, funding the new windfall for Texas' businesses represents a departure for Perry:
He acknowledged that it might require using some of the state's reserves, commonly known as the Rainy Day Fund, to cover the costs of his proposed tax cuts, but said he hopes the money can be found elsewhere in the budget...That concession was a dramatic departure from two years ago, when Perry -- looking to solidify his tea party credentials as he prepared for an unsuccessful presidential run -- said state reserve funds shouldn't be touched so Texas would be fully ready for a catastrophic natural disaster.
As we'll see below, so far the GOP-controlled legislature has had different plans for the state's currently overflowing coffers.

Thus far, Republicans instead have sought "to reverse some of the $5.4 billion it cut from public schools and educational grant programs in 2011, while also considering using the Rainy Day Fund to pay for key water and infrastructure projects." As Businessweek explained, Texas legislators are understandably wary of slashing business taxes further:

Texas' business franchise tax took its current form in 2006 and was meant to soften the blow from the Legislature's voting to slash statewide school property taxes by a third. Educational leaders say that, even at the time, lawmakers were warned that the business tax wouldn't make up for the lost property tax revenue -- and in the years since then Texas' per-pupil funding has plummeted.

Reducing the tax further could mean even less money for schools.

And that can't be a good thing for Texas education. Its 14th ranked school system is only 39th in state spending per student. (That is a lot better than the dismal Texas health care system, which Rick Perry claimed provided "the best health care in the country.")  Apparently in Rick Perry's Texas, every day is a rainy day for business.

Originally posted to Jon Perr on Wed Apr 17, 2013 at 01:33 PM PDT.

Also republished by TexKos-Messing with Texas with Nothing but Love for Texans and Houston Area Kossacks.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site