Skip to main content

Here's Sen. Charles Grassley on Tuesday morning, making a really, really bad argument for why the Boston attack shows why the Senate's immigration reform bill shouldn't pass (my transcript):
It has been reported that the older Boston bomber traveled to Russia and his name was misspelled on his airline ticket [...] If this bill were to pass as is, we'll continue to rely on airline personnel to properly type a name into a computer and not on biometric identifiers.
Apparently, Sen. Grassley has no idea that immigration reform has nothing to do with how we track the names of people flying in and out of the country. It's not like natural born citizens have "John Doe" or "Jane Doe" written on their airplane tickets and passports. If there's a problem with that system, it should be addressed, but there's no inherent reason that immigration reform should wait for that fix (or vice versa).

But despite the inanity of that argument, Grassley wasn't finished. Check this out:

Moreover, if the background checks on the 12 million people who are here illegally are anything like they were in the Boston bomber [case], we're in serious trouble.
If there's a way to improve background checks, it makes sense to do it, but Grassley apparently doesn't realize that (a) the terrorists he's worried about (from the 9/11 bombers to the Tsarnaevs) have all come through the legal immigration system, not the "12 million people who are here illegally" and (b) if you want to give people background checks, you have to establish a framework for giving them legal status. If you don't create a viable legal immigration system, you won't have any background checks at all for millions of people, so by his own standards doing nothing would be worse than doing something.

Grassley's position may be stupid, but some Republicans are hoping that it will derail immigration reform. As you'll see below the fold, even Marco Rubio expressed sympathy for it—but nonetheless reiterated his view that when it comes to immigration, "we still have a broken system that needs to be fixed."

Here's what Rubio said on Monday:

One of the bill’s Republican co-sponsors, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, broke with other authors and said the Boston attack may be a reason to slow consideration of the proposal.

“If there are flaws in our immigration system that were exposed by the attack in Boston, any immigration reform passed by Congress this year should address those flaws,” Rubio, a potential 2016 presidential candidate, said in a statement. “Congress needs time to conduct more hearings and investigate how our immigration and national security systems could be improved going forward.”

Rubio added:
The attack reinforces why immigration reform should be a lengthy, open and transparent process, so that we can ask and answer important questions surrounding every facet of the bill. But we still have a broken system that needs to be fixed.
Time will tell if this is kabuki from Rubio or if he's actually getting cold feet. I suspect the former, but suspicions tend to cause more trouble than they're worth and the one thing that's absolutely clear is there's no reason the attack in Boston should delay or derail immigration reform, no matter what Chuck Grassley says or tweets.
EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site