Skip to main content

Senator Tom Udall (D. NM) has been pushing a bill that expands relief for Americans suffering from radiation exposure:

http://www.cibolabeacon.com/...

U.S. Senator Tom Udall (D-N.M.) on Friday, April 19, led a bipartisan group of senators in renewing their efforts to expand restitution for Americans sickened from working in uranium mines or living downwind of atomic weapons tests. April 19 was the 24th anniversary of the introduction of the original Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) in the U.S. Senate.

Sens. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Mark Udall (D-Colo.), James Risch (R-Idaho), and Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) joined Tom Udall in reintroducing the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) Amendments of 2013, according to a press release provided by Udall’s Washington office.

Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM-3) concurrently introduced companion legislation in the House.

Among other things, the RECA Amendments of 2013 would build upon previous RECA legislation by qualifying post-1971 uranium workers for compensation; equalizing compensation for all claimants to $150,000; expanding the downwind exposure area to include seven states downwind of the Nevada and Trinity Test Sites; and funding an epidemiological study of the health effects on families of uranium workers and residents of uranium development communities.

“We have seen the heartbreaking effects of those who sacrificed their health and lives by working or living near uranium mines and nuclear test sites in the mid-20th century,” said Tom Udall. “Many Americans unwittingly paid the price for our national security, and unfortunately, some victims fell through the cracks in the original legislation. Expanding RECA will provide these individuals with recognition so that they can receive the much needed compensation they deserve.” - Cibola Beacon, 4/23/13
Here's what the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) Amendments of 2013 entails:
The Radiation Exposure Compensation Act Amendments of 2013 would:

• Extend compensation to employees of mines and mills employed after Dec. 31, 1971. These are individuals who began working in uranium mines and mills after the U.S. stopped purchasing uranium, but failed to implement and enforce adequate uranium mining safety standards. Many of these workers have the same illnesses as pre-1971 workers who currently qualify for RECA compensation.

• Add core drillers to the list of compensable employees, which currently only includes miners, millers and ore transporters.

• Add renal cancer, or any other chronic renal disease, to the list of compensable diseases for employees of mines and mills. Currently, millers and transporters are covered for kidney disease, but miners are not.

• Allow claimants to combine work histories to meet the requirement of the legislation. For example, individuals who worked for a short time in a mill and for a short time in a mine would be able to add those period of time up to meet the work history eligibility requirements for compensation. Currently, the Department of Justice makes some exceptions for this, but the policy is not codified in law.

• Make all claimants eligible for an equal amount of compensation, specifically $150,000, regardless of whether they are millers, miners, ore transporters, onsite employees, or downwinders. 


• Make all claimants eligible for medical benefits. Currently, only miners, millers and ore transporters can claim medical benefits through the medical expense compensation program.

• Recognize radiation exposure from the Trinity Test Site in New Mexico, as well as tests in the Pacific Ocean.

• Expand the downwind areas to include all of Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, and Utah for the Nevada Test Site; New Mexico for the Trinity Test Site; and Guam for the Pacific tests.

• Allow the use of affidavits to substantiate employment history, presence in affected area, and work at a test site. Current legislation only allows miners to use affidavits.

• Return all attorney fees to a cap of 10 percent of the amount of the RECA claim, as was mandated in the original 1990 RECA legislation.

• Authorize $3 million for five years for epidemiological research on the impacts of uranium development on communities and families of uranium workers. The funds would be allocated to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to award grants to universities and non-profits to carry out the research.

• Allow in the miners, millers, core drillers, and ore transporters to file a Special Exposure Cohort petition within the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA). Other DOE workers are currently allowed to file such petitions for compensation when claims are denied and there is not enough information for NIOSH to do dose reconstruction to determine the impacts of exposure.

Here's what the co-sponsors of the bill say:

http://www.tomudall.senate.gov/...

"Throughout history, New Mexico has made major contributions to our country's national security and energy needs, including communities across the state that were central to the mining and processing of uranium," said Heinrich. "But we've neglected our duty to the workers and miners and those living near uranium mines and nuclear test sites whose health have been gravely impacted, and it's critical that they be compensated for their suffering."
"Communities and individuals that have been adversely affected by our nation's nuclear weapons programs must be justly and sufficiently compensated by the federal government," said Crapo. "Passage of this bipartisan legislation is crucial in ensuring Idahoans get the care they need."
"We must never forget the heavy price that thousands of Americans paid during the Cold War-era nuclear arms race," Mark Udall said. "During that time, many Coloradans and other Americans were exposed to radiation in uranium mines and nuclear-weapons facilities, and they have spent decades struggling with an array of health problems, including cancer. This bill will ensure those Coloradans and other Americans get the help they need and deserve."
"This bill once again seeks a fair resolution for those people impacted by the nuclear testing program, just as others in surrounding states have been provided. Idahoans deserve the same care and compensation because of the identical health effects," said Risch.
"During the Cold War, thousands of Coloradans served our country by working to build the nation's nuclear arsenal. We now know that through no fault of their own, they were not properly protected from harmful radiation exposure," Bennet said. "We're working in a bipartisan way on behalf of those workers, their families and others who have suffered over many years. Addressing this wrong is the right and just thing to do."
"Too many people who worked at uranium mining sites during the Cold War have suffered for too long due to exposure to radiation," said Luján. "In addition, their families and their communities have paid the price as the legacy of uranium mining continues to be felt in the southwest. It is long overdue that we recognize the sacrifices and contributions of these individuals and the heavy toll that radiation exposure has taken on their health and well-being." - tomudall.senate.gov
Udall and Heinrich are also looking out for the Columbine-Hondo Wilderness:

http://www.abqjournal.com/...

Members of New Mexico’s congressional delegations are trying again to designate the 45,000-acre Columbine-Hondo area in Taos County as wilderness.

Sens. Tom Udall and Martin Heinrich, both Democrats, on Monday reintroduced legislation to give the area permanent wilderness status. A companion bill is expected to be introduced in the House Tuesday by Rep. Ben Ray Luján, a Democrat who represents northern New Mexico.

Located in the Carson National Forest, the Columbine-Hondo has been managed as a “Wilderness Study Area” since 1980. - Albuquerque Journal, 4/23/13

Here's a little background info on the Columbine-Hondo Wilderness:
The wild mountain basin in Taos County, noted for its natural beauty, is also the lifestream of downstream communities. Roberta Salazar, executive director of Rivers and Birds, said the Columbine-Hondo Wilderness provides one of the most critical resources for agriculture in Taos County - water.

"It's like gold here in this desert state," she said. "These high peaks of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains are our rain-catchers for the state. They really have some of the higher precipitation rates in the entire state, and this is the last unprotected wilderness area in the Sangre de Cristo Mountains."

Because legislation in Congress would remove protections from hundreds of wilderness study areas, she said, the Columbine-Hondo Wilderness Act is an important safeguard for the Taos County region. The new bill still faces its initial committee hearing.

Designating Columbine-Hondo as a permanent wilderness keeps an area valued for water, wildlife and tourism from any unnecessary development, Salazar said, adding that the very survival of the basin could be threatened without permanent protection.

"Industrial development could come in," she said. "We want to ensure that this mountain is always protected and that the watershed stays intact, because it could mean our survival in the future." - Public News Service 4/24/13

If you'd like to get more info on either of the legislation mentioned ahead, please contact either Udall or Heinrich's office for more information:

Udall: (202) 224-6621

Heinrich: (202) 224-5521

And if you would like to donate to Udall's re-election campaign, you can do so here:

From left, Bill Enloe, CEO of Los Alamos National Bank, Pete Lammers director of NMSU’s Algal Biofuels Program and Sen. Tom Udall have a discussion at the groundbreaking ceremony for the New Mexico Consortiums biology laboratory. (Submitted Photo) JUL12
https://secure.actblue.com/...

Originally posted to pdc on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 09:00 AM PDT.

Also republished by Climate Hawks, Colorado COmmunity, and New Mexico Kossaks.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (7+ / 0-)

    Funny Stuff at http://www.funnyordie.com/oresmas

    by poopdogcomedy on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 09:00:12 AM PDT

  •  Thanks for posting this. I love our NM Senators (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    HappyinNM, KayCeSF, flitedocnm, corvaire

    Udall and Heinrich - what a great team!

    •  I don't know much about Heinrich, but I have (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      jan4insight, flitedocnm

      a major crush on Udall. It's good they're doing this. I wonder if all the people in NM with "allergies" can put in claims also. I'm convinced that the magnitude of people with allergies in this state is from that crap from the Trinity Site forever living in our deserts.

      •  Never thought about the Trinity Site (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        KayCeSF, HappyinNM, flitedocnm

        related to allergies. I live (if you can call it that) with allergies year-round. Here in ABQ, I've heard it attributed to the big cement plant that's just off I-40 east of the mountains. When the wind blows fromt he east, it funnels that crap right through the gap in the mountains. blecch.

        Heinrich was our Rep before he was elected to the Senate last year. He's a good guy, progressive with strong union credentials.

        •  A bit further northward might help. (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          jan4insight, flitedocnm

          I also lived in the NE Heights for 15 years, but up by Montgomery/Wyoming the emissions from that Tijeras plant didn't seem to be a problem.  Springtime with its east winds blowing through must be hellacious for you!

          (-7.62,-7.33) Carbon footprint 12.6 metric tons. l'Enfer, c'est les autres.

          by argomd on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 11:25:46 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Winter is also bad with all the wood smoke from (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            argomd

            idiots with fireplaces (pardon my french, but a leaky inefficient fireplace in the city in the height of dumb). Of course wood smoke is classified as an "irritant" rather than an "allergen" so too bad for you say the allergy doctors :p

            The absolute worst place I lived for allergies was North Valley. I love it for its ambiance, but all of the smoke and pollen and dust etc drifts down in the lower elevation as the cold air moves downslope at night.

            •  Wood smoke "irritating" but not "allergenic"?? (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              jan4insight

              Talk about counterintuitive, perverse, counter-factual, simply dumb!  Where was it I lived where one just couldn't have wood fires if the weather conditions lead to those inversions?  The alert would be on the evening news and in the paper, which didn't matter to me as I never fired mine up.  My failing memory points to Albuquerque, but I must be wrong.  

              You have my sympathies, indeed.  The Albuquerque "box" is great for balloons, but not for those having to breathe that 'heavier' air down by the Rio Grande!

              On the other hand, I hope you'll take a second to smile at the Sandias on my behalf.  I miss NM terribly.

              --tx

              (-7.62,-7.33) Carbon footprint 12.6 metric tons. l'Enfer, c'est les autres.

              by argomd on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 03:47:41 PM PDT

              [ Parent ]

        •  A man I worked with (an environmentalist) (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          jan4insight, flitedocnm

          told me that all the allergies are from the desert plants. I decided in my little mind that they were from the remainder of the crap from the atomic bomb. Does anyone know how bits of uranium impact the body? Allergies are just your body rejecting something foreign. OK, so I'm crazy. But no one can explain the incredible proliferation of autism. It has got to be something in our food or water or the air.

          And thanks for the info on Heinrich. It makes me feel better. I voted for Balderas in the primary because I thought he was the better liberal.

          •  About Balderas, word on the street (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            HappyinNM

            is the his challenge in thr primary was a way to help position himself for a run for Gov. next time (2014, right?) I would so vote for him over the Teabag Tejana, in a heartbeat!

            (of course, I'd vote for any Dem with a pulse, including Marty Chavez whom I loathe, over the Teabag Tejana!)

            •  I hate Susana, and being from Las Cruces, (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              jan4insight

              I know of what I speak. But Marty Chavez is a wife-beater and he will never again get my vote. I'd rather sit on my hands if those two were the only choices.

              If Balderas runs for governor I won't be able to vote for him. Gary King is running, and he's my hero.

  •  I grew up in NM and at the age of 27 had my (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    flitedocnm

    thyroid removed because of cancerous tumor. The doctor who removed my thyroid asked me several questions:

    1. Did I have radiation treatments to treat acne? No.
    2. As an infant/toddler, did I wear a "radiation necklace" to reduce an enlarged thymus? No.
    3. Where did I spend my childhood years? New Mexico

    "Ah", the doctor said. "New Mexico is a "hot" state. There is an increased incidence of thyroid cancer for those who spent significant segments of time there, particularly during childhood."

    I applaud the effort to compensate those who have suffered due to radiation exposure. I was without insurance for several years while unemployed after funding for my job expired. Guess how difficult it was to find an insurance company that would insure a 55+ individual with a history of cancer.

    The world is not interested in the storms you encountered, but did you bring in the ship.

    by Hanging Up My Tusks on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 11:01:46 AM PDT

  •  Doing the right thing. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    KayCeSF, flitedocnm

    So pleased to see this happening!  One can't have spent years in New Mexico without understanding the nuclear connections -- one of which goes unmentioned in this post.  Tony Hillerman addressed it.  Many Diné (Navajo) worked in the uranium mines of the Colorado plateau in the post-WWII years and suffered high cancer rates as a result, keeping the IHS hospital in Albuquerque busy.  Most of that generation is gone, but not all, since almost no care was taken with mine tailings.  And then there's that incessant high desert wind moving things around....

    As to New Mexico's being "hot", I used to bring a Geiger counter into my underground college classroom and show my students just how radioactive the concrete-block walls were.  That and the natural arsenic in the Albuquerque aquifer worried some, but on the whole my own life in The Land of Enchantment was made ~0.01% less fantastic.

    With Warren, Udall, Merkeley, et al., and the retirement of Max (Show me to K Street!) Baucus, could it be we're seeing the birth of a new cadre of true public servants in the Senate?

    (-7.62,-7.33) Carbon footprint 12.6 metric tons. l'Enfer, c'est les autres.

    by argomd on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 11:22:23 AM PDT

  •  This is a big deal, not just for NM. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    SouthernLiberalinMD

    There have been plenty of others who have had significant radiation exposure in the SW, including Native Americans who live in surrounding states.

    I've tweeted this diary (using our new Kossack hashtag #kt2), and retweeted it from the feed of Southwest Research and Information Center (@SRICorg, www.sric.org) which does incredibly important (and often unnoticed) work on radiation and nuclear waste, especially regarding the Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP), which DOE is trying to get to accept high level nuclear waste from Hanford. SRIC is leading the effort to block this.

    We are very lucky to have Tom Udall and Martin Heinrich as our senators, and two excellent Reps with Ben Ray Lujan and Michelle Lujan Grisham. (Steve Pearce, not so much.)

  •  In some ways, Udall isn't half bad (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    poopdogcomedy

    Wasn't he part of the move for filibuster reform, along with Merkley?

    if necessary for years; if necessary, alone

    by SouthernLiberalinMD on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 05:03:57 PM PDT

  •  In fact, Udall's pretty good! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    poopdogcomedy

    if necessary for years; if necessary, alone

    by SouthernLiberalinMD on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 05:04:16 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site