Skip to main content

What can be said about latest round of UN climate negotiations, which wrapped-up in Bonn Friday?

In some ways, the outcome wasn't much of an outcome at all. Negotiators merely took note of what progress was made; knowing discussion on many of the same issues would continue when they meet again in Bonn in just a few weeks time. However, the rare focus on a single track of negotiations (as opposed to multiple tracks going on at once) seems to have allowed countries to hold more productive conversations about the issues at hand without getting stymied by how various pieces will fit together.

So what of that progress? There was definitely a positive change in tone. UNFCCC Executive Secretary Christiana Figueres described an increasing 'convergence'around opportunities for short-term ambition. The EU pushed a phase-out HFCs under the Montreal Protocol. There was mention of the importance of regulating airline emissions through the ICAO negotiations taking place this year; and suggestions that efforts to act on longstanding commitments to phase-out fossil-fuel subsidies could be part of the work done at this year's COP in Warsaw. AOSIS put forward a hopeful proposalon how developed countries might structure a process to raise ambition in the coming months, including a ministerial meeting on renewable energy and energy efficiency. All of this links with parallel discussions going on in different fora - ICAO, the Major Economies Forum, and so on - we hope it builds political momentum and leads to concrete action.

On the 2015 deal, countries began serious talk about what the agreement might look like. Negotiators began to tackle the idea of equity properly. And there was more 'convergence' around the ideas that any future system will have to be dynamic enough to change as the science and national circumstances change. A more troubling discussion came around the trade-offs between ambition versus participation and top-down versus bottom-up. Many of our partners are rightly worried about the idea that in order to keep all countries in the agreement, especially the US, ambition needs to be kept low and pledges nationally determined.

The reality is we need to ramp up ambition through equity, this will increase participation.  CAN called on Parties to adopt an "Equity Review" with which to assess pledges.  As Christian Aid's Mohammed Adow said, the key point is that, when producing their pledges to reduce carbon emissions at a national level, countries should be fully aware that their promises will be evaluated not only against the science, but the Convention’s equity principles as well.’

CAN summed it up in their press conference Friday, "Delegates have to move to a more concrete way of working.  Especially on short term ambition, which is in danger of becoming the poor cousin of the 2015 agreement – when in fact it is an essential precursor.  There’s no way the political will for a 2015 agreement will be in place without clear evidence that countries have made progress on the short term ambition front."

"But politicians have to have a hard look at the science, have a hard look at what is best for their constituents, and a hard look in the mirror – and come to Warsaw with finance pledges; a willingness to work together on renewable energy and energy efficiency; agree to reduce aviation emissions in the ICAO; to phase out F gases in the Montreal Protocol; and that 2014 is going to be the year of increased short term ambition."

Negotiators gather again in June to continue discussions at the Bonn Intersessional. In the meantime 35 invited Ministers will gather next week at the 4th Petersberg Summit co-hosted by Germany and Polish Environment Ministers. Angela Merkel will open the Summit and you can catch her remarks live by webcast at 9:30 CET this Monday. Details can be found at Petersberg Climate Dialogue.

Resources & Tools

From our partners and peers
Climate vulnerable states call for greater ambition at UN talks
RTCC has a great round-up of perspectives on what happened in Bonn and what has to happen next.


From our Negotiator Trackers

Talking Heads: Day 5 of the Bonn Climate Change Conference
RTCC's Ed King joined Sebastien Duyck and myself for Adopt a Negotiator's daily broadcast from Bonn giving an overview of the last day and what it means.

Pictures from the talks
Adopt a Negotiator's photo library has a collection of royalty-free pictures from the talks. Feel free to use them in your own work.

Elsewhere on the interwebs Trackers

UN climate change talks wrap up in Bonn as new data shows rising carbon levels in world’s atmosphere
Free Speech Radio News interviews Meena Raman from the Third World Network

Climate negotiators inch closer to global pact
DW puts the talks closing in the context of the Philippines drowning, climate impacts on women, and the long road to Paris
Nations seek flexible climate approach, but no breakthrough in Bonn
Alister Doyle's summary for Reuters

New focus on injecting fairness into climate talks a cause for hope
Energy Bangla reports from the CAN presser in the story above and here.

Originally posted to Joshua Weise on Fri May 03, 2013 at 04:33 PM PDT.

Also republished by Climate Change SOS.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site