Skip to main content

Today, I had the opportunity to listen to Jeremy Scahill, author of "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army" speak about his new book, "Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield." The crowd squeezed into the small venue of The Last Bookstore (an appropriate name for a bookstore nowadays) in downtown Los Angeles to hear him give a scathing indictment of the current policy by our government to conduct secret wars across the globe.  The movie version of the book by the same title is on it's way to theaters soon, and has already won praise at Sundance. A quick google and you can view the trailer yourself.

The reality of the terror that is being inflicted across the globe in our name should be a concern to all American citizens.  We are told we are bombing the "enemy," and we are taking out the terrorists before they have a chance to carry out their evil plans to kill Americans on our shores.  We are assured that the kill lists that our government uses in order to take out these said "terrorists" is reviewed in depth, and approved by the highest reaches in our government, heads of the CIA and our own President.  We are told, these are evil people who want to harm us, because of our "freedoms" here in the US.  We are told this War on Terror is a war without real end.  For every terrorist we remove, there will be more to take his place.  It is truly an unwinnable situation.  A perfect situation for the military industrial complex.

We invaded Iraq during the Bush administration under the concerns, we were told, that there were WMD's.  That Saddam had weapons that would harm Americans, and he was intent on using them on us.  We had to take action before the smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud appeared.  Certain 24 hour news channels fed the lie over and over again that Iraq somehow had something to do with 9/11.  While we know this is a false assertion, there are those who still believe that Iraq had something to do with 9/11.  The fact that they still believe this lie is I believe a part of the problem for the public dialogue about the realities of war.  Members of the previous administration proudly boast on national tv that they would, if given the chance, indeed do the same thing, and attack a nation innocent of any crimes against the United States of America.

The fact is, this is already happening, secretly, in many places around the world.  America, unknown to most Americans, is the aggressor.  While leaders claim we are "defending" ourselves against known "terrorists," our bombs are dropping into countries on the other side of the world, killing innocent women, children, and many times, innocent men.  There are secret covert operations, secret prisons, secret places of torture, and secret renditions, still taking place.  Americans are kept in the dark about such things, or maybe choose to turn a blind eye in the direction of such atrocities, because it is simply too hard to accept the truth of the matter.  No one wants to really swallow that bitter pill that our country is performing such despicable acts on innocent human beings.  We rally around our own injured and fallen, in attacks such as the one in Boston.  We praise our heroes who ran towards the bombs.  We set up a fundraising campaign for the injured.  We don't talk too openly about those who lost limbs who have no health insurance.  We show pictures of the innocent little 8 year old child who only wished for peace, and who's parents will forever grieve his loss.  

Yet, for some reason, we do not shed tears for the innocent dead on their way to a wedding party, or on their way to bury their own dead as the result of a bombing a few days prior.  Or the killing of a 16 year old child, an American citizen, for no apparent reason other than what Robert Gibbs is quoted as saying was the result of bad parenting.  For some reason, because those over there, a world away, are of another ethic back round, are Muslim, or have darker skin than us, for some reason, those losses are not mourned.  They are those who happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time.  They were hanging around those known terrorist hot spots.  Collateral damage. We're busy protecting American lives, so what if a few dark skinned Muslims have to die in the process?

No longer can we turn a blind eye and claim that we don't understand why a couple of young men in Boston would attack innocent civilians while in the meantime we don't acknowledge the terror we are inflicting on innocent civilians in other countries.  No longer can we sit still and let our leaders sift through kill lists, becoming judge, jury, and executioner to those who are offered no day in court, no awareness of their supposed crimes, no lawyer to defend their rights, no voice to speak out on their behalf to the injustices that are being inflicted on them, on a daily basis.  Is this justice?  Is this the "democracy" we are spreading across the globe?  Is this the kind of treatment we will allow our fellow human beings to endure in the name of God and country?

How long until those who've endured watching their loved ones being blown into pieces by American made bombs retaliate in the name of revenge and justice that they interpret as just and honorable?  Can you close your eyes and imagine going to your sister's wedding and having most of your family blown up by drones from another country?  We endured an attack on Boston, watched in horror as the video of a bomb exploding was replayed again and again, watched their stories unfold, witnessed their hopes and dreams being permanently altered by the violence inflicted upon them.  In other places, this scenario is played out again and again as bombs fall across their countries.  Children don't go to school for fear of drones.  Local tribal leaders don't meet, for fear that the grainy images viewed on a computer screen somewhere in a bunker in New Mexico might be mistaken for an Al Qaeda conspiracy, and they'll be blown to bits.  

The war on terror will never be won by inflicting more terror in the world.  War does not promote peace.  Dropping bombs does not promote democracy.  Murder does not make us a free nation.

Jeremy Scahill is doing what so few others will do, or can do.  He is pulling back the curtain to reveal the truth about what is being done in our name.  It's about time we took a hard look at the truth, for only when we acknowledge the reality of the situation, will we be able to take a stand and do something to change it.

Originally posted to regibaby67 on Sun May 05, 2013 at 07:27 PM PDT.

Also republished by Bloggers Against Torture.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Amen. It's been this way for a long time altho (9+ / 0-)

    now it's in hyperdrive in the quest for world supremacy.  Remember General Smedley Butler and his book, War is a Racket.  He was a Marine General, the most decorated Marine prior to WWII.  

    "War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.   I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. ."

    Even with the unsecret wars people still delude themselves that it's about fighting terrorism, being a Global Force for Good, and humanitarianism. The country that purports to be all about democracy is the one that prevents democracy the most.

    "I'm an antiwar propagandist as accused by democrats. Not even republicans have called me that."

    by BigAlinWashSt on Sun May 05, 2013 at 07:58:24 PM PDT

  •  As a Country We Are Much Closer (14+ / 0-)

    To what we are accused of being than what we think of ourselves.

    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.

    by The Baculum King on Sun May 05, 2013 at 08:02:00 PM PDT

  •  "We will not learn how to live together in peace.. (3+ / 0-)

    by killing each other's children." - Former President Jimmy Carter.

    Your black cards can make you money, so you hide them when you're able; in the land of milk and honey, you must put them on the table - Steely Dan

    by OrdinaryIowan on Sun May 05, 2013 at 09:19:03 PM PDT

  •  A war on terror (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    like a war on drugs, is a war without end, a war in which our actions result in reactions and thus perpetual war. It does not take a powerful, technologically advanced military to engage in terrorist activities.

    We know this and so do the powers that be.

    We do need a pretext to justify the quest for global dominance that BigAl mentions in his comment. A war on terror is the perfect cover.

    With our actions we can create "terrorists" anywhere we choose, anywhere US interests might be at stake. We can also help to create terrorist bugimen through an obliging media or through operations on the "dark side" tasked with staging false flag events which can then be blamed on those we wish to demonize.

    Forget about any help from the "MSM". They are not on the side of those of us who desire peace, freedom and prosperity for all. They are there to promote the establishment of which they are a part and to play an important role in garnering support through misinformation, selective and one-sided reporting and outright propaganda.

    The proponents are many. They are powerful and extremely wealthy. There is an interesting diagram depicting the various nodes of the elite power structure. It is copyrighted so I will not post it in this comment. It may be seen at this link, scroll down to "... maintaining and extending global dominance".

    Noam Chomsky in his book Hegemony or Survival, published in 2003, notes that that:

    U.S. foreign policy – whether controlled by Republican or Democratic administrations – still follows the same agenda of gaining access to lucrative resources and maintaining U.S. world dominance.


    A serious financial implosion, a serious lack of political support at home and around the world, or some other unforeseen events could delay or end the quest for global hegemony.

    Meanwhile the war on terror and dirty wars will go on.

    Orwell - "Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable"

    by truong son traveler on Mon May 06, 2013 at 04:42:18 AM PDT

  •  ...that must have been great to see... (0+ / 0-)
    Welcome from the DK Partners & Mentors Team. If you have any questions about how to participate here, you can learn more at the Knowledge Base or from the New Diarists Resources Diaries. Diaries labeled "Open Thread" are also great places to ask. We look forward to your contributions.

    Ignorance is bliss only for the ignorant. The rest of us must suffer the consequences.

    by paradise50 on Mon May 06, 2013 at 07:46:13 AM PDT

  •  Obama has set Cheney's "Assassination Squad" (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    in stone by officially bringing JSOC under his personal control. What is the difference between this and a dictator of a third world banana republic who employs a quasi-military police force to do his personal bidding? It is a very small leap to go from assassinating an American on foreign soil to doing the same as a covert operation within the country.

    Here's an NPR report:

    The World Is a Battlefield: Jeremy Scahill on "Dirty Wars" and Obama’s Expanding Drone Attacks

    ...under both Bush and Obama, the world has been declared the battlefield. You know, the Authorization for the Use of Military Force that was passed after 9/11 is technically the law that President Obama and his administration point to when they say they have a right to drone strike in Yemen, because these people are connected to the 9/11 attacks. But in reality, one of the enduring legacies of the Obama presidency is going to be that he solidified this Cheneyesque view of the U.S. government, which says that when it comes to foreign policy, that the executive branch is effectively a dictatorship and that Congress only has a minimal role to play in oversight.

Click here for the mobile view of the site