Skip to main content

Here is what I don’t get about the IRS/Tea Party pseudo-scandal – isn’t truth a strong defense here?  Why can’t the lawyers for the IRS say that since these groups identified themselves with a “party,” the IRS assumed that their reason for being would be primarily political, and so not tax exempt.  Also since that party, “Taxed Enough Already,” was fundamentally anti-tax, the IRS felt there was an elevated likelihood that such groups would interpret tax-exempt criteria in an excessively broad manner, because avoiding tax is one of their main preoccupations.

We might also remember that the Tea Party movement was a corporate creation, not, as it’s usually represented, some grass-roots movement.  It is, in its very DNA, an effort by corporate interests to deceive the public and the media, a disguise for their agenda and their political spending in support of that agenda.  Given the corporate agenda, and the demonstrable, broad-daylight, right-wing conspiracy to buy the most “business friendly” government possible, wouldn’t the IRS have been remiss had its people not paid special attention to the groups who slavishly adopted the branding suggested by the corporate funders. And finally, will the coming congressional inquiries address such  questions as: Did any of these so called public service organizations perform any function that was not basically political, and if they did not, wasn’t their tax-exempt status perfectly questionable?

It seems to me that if the Democrats handled this properly, the coming inquests could be converted into an exposure of corporate shilling and political money laundering -- not that I have any confidence the Lemmingcrats will see such an opportunity.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site