Skip to main content

A riddle. What is the difference between Bob Woodward and LeftOfYou? LeftOfYou actually remembers Watergate. I was a Naval officer, on a warship, in a combat ready assignment, serving overseas. I felt like what was happening to my Commander-in-Chief, Richard Nixon, was of some personal importance to me. I paid close attention. Later, I read books about it, including Bob Woodward's and Carl Bernstein's. I remember Watergate, in detail. Recent evidence suggests that Bob Woodward, who made his D.C. bones on Watergate, seemingly does not.

Our own Jed Lewison properly castigated famous Washington villager, Woodward, for the author and pundit's idiotic comparison of Watergate to Benghazi. Now even MSM voices have begun to call Woodward for BS on this one, albeit with velvet glove.  

Come out into the tall grass to find out more and talk about it.

On Friday, the Christian Science Monitor's Washington Editor,Peter Grier, gave Bob Woodward's Benghazi rantings a complete airing and then ever so gently called BS.

Ever since Watergate, Bob Woodward has been dining out on on the historical scandal. Ever since Watergate, political scientist, Jonathan Bernstein has been studying the scandal. Grier's CSM editorial cites Bernstein's blog,A plain blog about politicss, to debunk Woodward's ridiculous rantings about Benghazi and Watergate.  

So Bernstein debunks Woodward. Ha ha. That's rich. And does he ever!  Using simple statements of uncontroversial historical facts about the Watergate crimes and cover-up, Bernstein utterly demolishes the very idea of meaningful similarities between the conduct of the Nixon Administration in connection with Watergate and the conduct of the Obama Administration in connection with Benghazi. He begins:

Obviously, things don't have to be as bad as Watergate to be important malfeasance, but given all the loose talk about "cover-up" and "worse than Watergate" in the context of Benghazi, I figured it was worth just pointing out quickly the general outlines of the Watergate cover-up.

* The cover-up was essentially directed by the president, overseen by the White House Chief of Staff, and at the operational level run by the White House Counsel.

* A false story was concocted.

* Both at the White House and at the campaign committee, everyone involved destroyed evidence.

Bernstein then recites six different blatantly criminal schemes carried out under the Watergate umbrella. He sums up:
The reason for the Watergate cover-up was that specific crimes had been committed, crimes which could have (had they been confessed to in June 1972) sent much of the senior White House staff, much of the campaign organization, and perhaps the President of the United States straight to prison.
The facts of Benghazi are invisible by comparison to Watergate and involve a totally different kind of conduct altogether at a much lower level of officialdom, for completely different reasons. So other than being completely different, in Woodward's distorted hindsight, Benghazi is just the same as Watergate. BS.

Thanks CSM, for saying so, if ever so gently.  

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  And you shall know the truth (13+ / 0-)

    and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:32)

    Does it trouble anyone else that the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency declares itself to be guided by a Christian Bible verse?  

    "The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." John Kenneth Galbraith

    by LeftOfYou on Sun May 19, 2013 at 03:19:41 PM PDT

  •  Thanks for posting. I've been carrying on this (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sceptical observer, JohnB47

    lengthy dialogue with someone on FaceBook who maintains that Obama is as bad as, or worse even, than Nixon.

    I've been trying to say, um, no way, no how. This blog you link to will help me further my efforts, not that anyone has ever been convinced to change his or her mind based on FB posts, mind you :)

  •  The "Worse than Watergate" Cheerleading (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JohnB47

    is to resurrect Nixon at least as much as it is to destroy Obama. As soon as Reagan was in the White House, he was bringing Nixon in from San Clemente for special assignments. Remember the picture of the three past presidents leaving for Sadat's funeral? Reagan, Ford and Nixon hugging and laughing like bar buddies with Carter way off to the side, grinning.  

    So many of Nixon's men and fans are still in positions of influence to this day.

  •  I was watching when 'secret tapes' were revealed (0+ / 0-)

    It seemed the Nixon admin. might be able to weather the storm (except for bee hive that Attorney General Mitchell's wife caused), and then low an behold a junior WH secretary mentioned rather off the cuff that Nixon secretly taped every conversation in the Oval Office. That seems to have been the turning point for those following the Watergate hearings. Nixon fired Archibald Cox and AG Richardson quit in protest, and finally the stories by a couple hungry reporters changed the nation and saved the country.
    Now one of those hungry reporters is being fed by the same cabal he once helped expose, Woodward sold out a long time ago, now he conveniently forgets the atrocities he exposed, as he now champions the very excesses that were reborn with the Bush II administration.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site