Skip to main content

Received this e-mail from Congresswoman Annie Kuster (D. NH-02) today:
Today, the House voted on a bill regarding the controversial Keystone XL pipeline that would move the project forward before President Obama’s review is done.

I take issue with any bill that would exclude the President’s role in making a decision like this by simply cutting off his review before he is done. That’s just not right.

And, the truth is I wholeheartedly believe we can create jobs and energy without putting the environment at risk, by making investments in American-made renewable energy.

If you too believe we can and should create jobs and energy by making investments in American-made renewable energy and infrastructure projects, then join me. Stand up for us here at home and add your name:

http://wfc2.wiredforchange.com/...

This proposal has raised significant possible environmental concerns. It is only right that we make sure we give the Keystone XL pipeline a thorough review – that’s why I voted no. There is no good reason to cut off the President’s review before he is done.

We can do better and the American people deserve better. I told you when you helped elect me that I would be a different kind of leader – putting the people of New Hampshire before politics every time. And you can count on it. Add your name now if you agree we can do better!

http://wfc2.wiredforchange.com/...

Thank you for standing with me!

Annie

You can sign Kuster's petition here:

http://wfc2.wiredforchange.com/...

Originally posted to pdc on Wed May 22, 2013 at 08:30 PM PDT.

Also republished by Take New Hampshire Forward! and Climate Hawks.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MsGrin, Albanius, Darryl House, Desi

    Funny Stuff at http://www.funnyordie.com/oresmas

    by poopdogcomedy on Wed May 22, 2013 at 08:30:12 PM PDT

  •  Thx, I feel good about contributing to Kuster (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    True North

    I generally favored progressive women with competitive races , but regret supporting Heitkamp (DINO-ND) - all I looked at there was close Senate race, in a very low pop state where money goes further.

    With 20/20 hindsight, I would redirect the $ I gave Heitcamp to give more to Shelley Berkely in NV, another close race in a fairly low pop state, but an actual progressive.

    Live and learn.  For 2016 I am supporting Elizabeth Warren for President.  The planet cannot afford another term or two of corporate Dems running the executive branch (IMO no one who can win the Repug primary can get elected President for the foreseeable future.)

    There's no such thing as a free market!

    by Albanius on Wed May 22, 2013 at 09:43:12 PM PDT

  •  I got the email and consigned it to the trash (0+ / 0-)

    without reading. I'm annoyed by this pandering to environmentalists with symbolic votes that are essentially meaningless. For that matter, the President's review is also meaningless. The most he can hope for is that additional delay will persuade the money men to retract their investments, as has been happening with nuclear plant construction for the last three decades. Counting on greed to save out bacon is a chancy enterprise.
    The problem lies with the whole permitting process. Permits, you see, are based on the premise that the actions or behaviors being permitted are benign. So, the permits have to be issued, unless there is proof positive at the outset that the behaviors for which the permit is requested are detrimental or destruction -- something that is impossible to do ahead of time.
    The presumption of probity is like the presumption of innocence -- entirely appropriate when we are dealing with what a natural individual person is capable of doing. Because individuals acting alone are limited in their capacity for mischief and misbehavior, we can wait to take action until after they have done something bad. However, applying this same principle to the behavior of artificial bodies or groups of people, acting in concert to shape the surface of the earth, is inappropriate. But, it is what happens because artificial persons are not differently defined in the law. And that's the fault of Congress.
    So, if a Congressperson like Kuster were sincere in her concern, she'd not be saying "let the President do it." Instead, she would be saying "I and my colleagues need to change the definition of corporation and specify that the behavior of such a body needs to be strictly limited ahead of time to preclude any adverse impact on the natural environment, as well as procedures to correct and remediate for accidents." Kuster would not be looking to enlarge her potential donor list with signatures on a petition for ineffective action.
    Kuster is a Con, even though she ran under the Democratic banner. She traded on her mother's reputation and her gender to replace another Con. Kuster does not accept email communications from people who live outside her district. Dollars, however, are welcome.

    We organize governments to deliver services and prevent abuse.

    by hannah on Thu May 23, 2013 at 04:11:30 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site