Skip to main content

You Can’t Read That! is a periodic diary featuring banned book reviews and news roundups.

can't read_47

YCRT! News

A Chicago area school board is reconsidering its ban of The Perks of Being a Wallflower.

Worth another mention: The Political Agenda of the Morality Police. My only objection? The author doesn't connect the dots tying widespread attempts to have books restricted or banned to organized right-wing Christianist activism. Here are some items I've covered in previous YCRT! columns:


The more I read news articles about challenges to school text and library books, educational videos, plays put on by drama departments, articles in student newspapers, or the very subjects of courses listed in elementary, secondary, and college curricula, the more I sense right-wing Christianist activism at work. Far from being isolated incidents of parents being shocked at something a child brings home from school, I believe these reports indicate an organized movement to force a specific Christian religious message on children.

I see, for example, Christianist activism at work here:

Screen Shot 2013-05-31 at 1.28.42 PM

If you read the linked article, you'll learn that the video in question frames its anti-suicide message (totally appropriate for 12- and 13-year-old students) by creating a fictional homosexual society in which heterosexuals are denounced and bullied and referred to as "breeders," and it's pretty clear this is what the parent is actually objecting to. There's a strong pro-bullying movement among the Christianist set, especially when it comes to putting gay, atheist, and otherwise non-conforming schoolkids in their places.

The Christianist impulse to bully the rest of us into conformity is at work in a minister's experience at a ball park: "One hot Sunday afternoon last season, I did not rise for 'God Bless America.' In a beer-soaked tone of voice that wasn’t pleasant, a gentleman several rows behind me told me to stand up. I reminded him that I don’t have to."

Christianist activism is, more pertinently to the subject of my YCRT! posts, obviously at work in organized and persistent efforts to ban certain books written for children and young adults, a few of which I review below.

YCRT! Banned Book Reviews

It shouldn't surprise anyone that books written for children and teens are the most frequent targets of Christianist activism. Here are four short reviews of frequently banned and challenged books. I wrote these in 2009, shortly after starting my banned books project. In each case I include my own original comments, followed by additional information on parental and religious group challenges taken from R. Wolf Baldassarro's excellent Banned Books Awareness blog.

tango makes threeAnd Tango Makes Three
Justin Richardson & Peter Parnell
2_0

My original review:

Looks innocent, doesn't it? What if I told you Tango has two daddies? Ah, now you understand. This book isn't just gay, it's homosexual agenda gay! If your children read this they will TURN OUT GAY! Oh, and whatever you do, don't let the kiddies see the first illustration, which clearly shows a mixed-race lesbian couple entering the zoo. Case. Closed. Seriously, it's difficult to see this book as anything other than a pitch for tolerance of alternate lifestyles (not that that's a bad thing, and it's not like children's literature hasn't always been used to advance moral messages, but in this case the effort seems unusually heavy-handed).

From the Banned Book Awareness blog:

And Tango Makes Three is always at or near the top of the American Library Association's annual banned books list. Challenges to Tango almost always come from religious groups and parents, who object strongly to the notion that homosexuality occurs naturally in the animal kingdom because of what that implies about human homosexuality.

wrinkle in timeA Wrinkle in Time
Madeleine L'Engle
2_0

My original review:

As an adult, I often read books aimed at teenagers, and I looked forward to reading this one because it's cataloged as science fiction and I'm a sci-fi geek. But A Wrinkle in Time, despite a head-nod to interstellar travel through wormholes, a well-worn sci-fi convention, is really magic, fantasy, and witchcraft, wrapped around a Christian, Chronicles of Narnia-like message.

So why is it that L'Engle's book is so often challenged? Because, I suppose, a certain kind of Christian hates being reminded that Christ preached love over vengeance and hate. And then there's the passage where L'Engle gives Ghandi equal billing with Jesus. Hell, I could have told her that was a non-starter!

From the Banned Book Awareness blog:

L'Engle was in fact a Christian, the official writer-in-residence at New York City’s Cathedral of St. John the Divine. Christian opponents of her book, however, point to the fact that she was an Episcopalian, and thus a liberal, and thus a commie. Other objections? Placing Ghandi on a plane with Jesus, which I have already mentioned. New age religion and magic. Strong female characters. Since its publication, A Wrinkle in Time has consistently placed in the ALA's annual top 100 list of banned & challenged books.

james and the giant peachJames and the Giant Peach
Roald Dahl
3_0

My original review:

I can already hear you asking why anyone would want to keep kids from reading such a cute-looking book. My god, have you read the thing? A malingering boy, shirking his chores, meets a rain-coated pervert and accepts from him a bag of body parts harvested from endangered species, then drops the illicit gift and creates hideous genetic mutations. He then runs away with giant insects, murdering his legal guardians in the process. And not one mention of Christ, never mind any hint of remorse, punishment, and eternal damnation. I weep for the souls of children exposed to this evil work of Satan.

From the Banned Book Awareness blog:

James and the Giant Peach has been challenged for being too scary for its targeted age group. Specific objections include the inclusion of mysticism, sexual inferences, profanity, racism, references to tobacco and alcohol, as well as perceived promotion of disobedience, drugs, and communism. In a Wisconsin challenge, the repeated use of the word "ass." A perennial on the ALA's annual lists of banned & challenged books.

bridge to terabithiaBridge to Terabithia
Katherine Paterson
3_5

My original review:

I didn't have to wonder long why this charming story frightens God-fearing parents: a strong female character who's out of the kitchen, hints of sexuality, dirty fucking hippies, possible Jews. Stir in a flip attitude toward organized religion, insufficient fealty to Christ, elements of witchcraft, and you've got subversive literature, right here in River City! It's also a terribly good story about friendship, growing up, and death, a story that will make a positive and lasting impression on young (and old) readers.

From the Banned Book Awareness blog:

Number 8 on the ALA’s list of the 100 most banned & challenged books for 1990-2000, number 28 for 2001-2009. Primary objections? Death as an essential part of the plot, use of the word "lord" outside of prayer, offensive language, and claims that the book promotes secular humanism, new age religions, the occult, and satanism. Some critics also proclaim that Leslie is not a good role model simply because she doesn’t attend church. A Connecticut parents' petition to a school board urged it to “eliminate the study of materials containing information about witchcraft, magic, evil spells, or related material now and forever. We believe this material is satanic, a danger to our children, is being studied excessively, and has no place in our schools.”

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thank you for the many valuable links, including (5+ / 0-)

    the powerpoint slides. "R U Awake?" indeed.

    I resent that. I demand snark, and overly so -- Markos Moulitsas.

    by commonmass on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 07:02:44 AM PDT

  •  Another great diary, pwoodford. I appreciate all (5+ / 0-)

    the information, but I love the snark that sneaks through. Much better for the blood pressure than being pissed off at the incredibly closed-minded bigotry based on irrational paranoia that is at the base of so much of the repressive book-banning.

    What cracks me up is the way that censorship ends up making the book or movie or whatever a thousand times more appealing to kids. Duh! Were these parents all little automatons as children? And I guess none of them ever took a psychology class in college, either. Of course not.

    If you don't want your kid reading something, that's one thing, and good luck with that. But the attitude that because it bothers you, then no one should be able to have access to it, is both obnoxious and annoying. And I agree with you that it mainly originates from RW religious fanaticism. If they ever wonder why it seems some people don't like them, it's simple. It's that whole holier-than-thou, I'm-the-boss-of-you attidude combined with the chip on their shoulder.

    Last night I watched a commercial on USA about a dad and mom overcoming their initial negative reactions on finding out that their daughter is going to marry the love of her life--another woman. By the end of the commercial, the dad has walked his daughter down the aisle and given a toast affirming the parents' love for his daughter and her new bride. I thought it was really touching and well done. Whatcha wanna bet the usual suspects are throwing fits about it? "That commercial should be banned...." ya gotta feel sorry for people like that. Bigotry is an awfully heavy burden to tote around.

    "In politics stupidity is not a handicap." Napoleon Bonaparte

    by citylights on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 08:05:57 AM PDT

  •  My kids have read... all but the last one (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Aunt Pat, RiveroftheWest

    My son wasn't interested in "Bridge to Terabithia", and my daughter isn't quite there yet. Soon though, probably in audio she'll read it.

    She really liked "And Tango Makes Three".

    "Madness! Total and complete madness! This never would've happened if the humans hadn't started fighting one another!" Londo Mollari

    by FloridaSNMOM on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 09:05:53 AM PDT

  •  It's a good list... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Aunt Pat, RiveroftheWest

    I recall liking a wrinkle in time very much and read the next several...

    Deserves it! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends. - Gandalf the Grey

    by No Exit on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 09:56:20 AM PDT

  •  Thank you! (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Aunt Pat, RiveroftheWest

    I appreciate your diaries very much!

    Join us at Bookflurries-Bookchat on Wednesday nights 8:00 PM EST

    by cfk on Sat Jun 08, 2013 at 10:40:18 AM PDT

Click here for the mobile view of the site