Skip to main content

Andrew Cuomo is now touting his new "Tax Free New York" plan.  The idea is to turn areas surrounding New York State Universities and community colleges into "tax free communities."  There would be no sales, property, business, or corporate taxes in these areas for 10 years. There would be no personal income tax for 5 years, and after that personal income tax only on income over $200,000. On the web site, several CEO plutocrats enthusiastically promote the plan.

Jamie Dimon, CEO, JPMorgan

Tax-Free NY is the type of visionary thinking we need from our leaders.  Upstate New York has great strengths – like universities and entrepreneurs – that we need to continue to support. This is a creative way to do that, and to position Upstate for jobs and growth in new and promising industries.

Home Depot co-founder Kenneth Langone had this to say:
I've said it repeatedly: States need to begin helping businesses by lifting the tax burden and also creating an environment in which employees want to raise their families.  Governor Cuomo has answered that call with his Tax Free Communities initiative
But who is he talking about when he says the "Tax Free New York" plan would create an environment where employees want to raise their families?  Is he talking about people and families that directly and indirectly benefit from public investment in health care, infrastructure, education, and a safety net?  Or is he talking about the few and the elite families who have always resented having to help pay for these programs?  After all, they use private schools, private jets, private health care, live in gated communities.

The whole plan is based on the 30 year old false premise tax cuts alone represent the path to economic growth. There is little to no emphasis on the shared economic benefits of investments in health care, infrastructure, education, unemployment benefits, and a strong safety net. That's a debate we need to desperately change!

Tax Revenues have fallen to just 15% of GDP, the lowest in 60 years.

If tax reductions alone generated economic prosperity, we'd have a booming economy. Why has the U6 unemployment rate risen from 7.1% in January 2000 to a high of 17.1% in October 2009 down to 13.8% today?  If tax cuts alone created prosperity, why has income inequality returned to 1920's levels?

But back to the plan. Richard Kirsch from the Roosevelt Institute has written an article illustrating why Gov. Cuomo's "Tax Free New York" plan would come at a high cost. He had this to say about it:

But Governor Cuomo has this totally backwards. Universities are business innovators because of the creative people who work there. Eliminating taxes around a community college or university does not make the people who teach and do research more creative or innovative. Businesses don’t start in university communities because of low taxes. Businesses are started in university communities because of the quality of the researchers and intellectual richness of the faculty. Attracting and supporting them takes money – from taxes!
In other words, it takes a lot more than workable taxes for a business to thrive in the state?  Don't they need a health, educated workforce?  Don't they need customers who have money to buy their product or service?  

Thoughts?  Agree with the plan?  Disagree?  I think it is more of the same - the notion that tax reductions alone solve our problems rather than making desperate needed public investments in health care, job training, education, the environment, and the safety net. And that's a debate we need to change and how to do that is another diary!

Originally posted to joedemocrat on Sat Jun 15, 2013 at 03:22 PM PDT.

Also republished by Community Spotlight.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site