Skip to main content

Discrimination may not be as prevalent as it was in the 1960's however that does not mean we do not need the Voters Rights Act.

Today the US Supreme Court struck down a key section of the Voters Rights Act (VRA). The Voters Rights Act was created because some communities were violating voters rights by creating rules to prohibit voters. These rules ranged from poll taxes to testing requirements for registration.  In section 4 of the VRA some communities were mandated to get pre-authorization prior to making changes to their voter registration process and voting restrictions.

The Communication Workers of America summed it up nicely in a brief statement:

"It wasn’t in 1956 that the community of Calera, Ala., attempted to restrict the vote and the voice of its African-American citizens. It was just seven years ago, in 2006."

"This example, and too many more like it, clearly demonstrates that the Voting Rights Act is needed today more than ever.  Attempts to cut voting hours and polling places, limit early voting and restrict registration, especially targeting students, the elderly, people of color and the poor are all too pervasive in our nation today."

"Voter suppression in any form harms our democracy. CWA, the NAACP and other partners are determined to eliminate this and other barriers to democracy."

Many of the challenges voters face now, is the creation of Voter ID laws. These laws are sweeping the country like a plague.  SEIU President Mary Kay Henry had this to say after the ruling:
“The facts are that conditions have not changed in many parts of our country where voters have suffered from a long history of racial discrimination in voting and new forms of voter suppression continue to threaten our democracy. In many states and localities across the country, we saw efforts to disenfranchise African American and Latino voters during the 2012 election. Whether in the form of onerous voter ID laws or citizenship check boxes meant to confuse voters, state and local governments are already changing their election laws and procedures in ways that will disenfranchise millions of eligible voters, including the elderly, the disabled and young people.

“With this decision, state and local governments in areas with a proven history of racial discrimination in voting will have no effective check on their power to change election laws as they please, potentially opening the floodgates to even more discriminatory practices that will prevent eligible citizens from voting. Congress should move swiftly to remedy the harm that the Court has done to one of our most important civil rights laws.

AFT President Randi Wiengarten agrees that our rights as voters are still under attack every day.
“With today’s ruling, a narrow majority of the Supreme Court rolls back the protections of a fundamental civil rights law that has preserved voting rights for millions of Americans. For nearly 50 years, the Voting Rights Act has enshrined the right to free and fair elections in our country. Sadly, this is a decision that makes you shake your head and ask: Does the Court majority live in the same world that we do—how can they be so out of touch with the real-life efforts to suppress voting that are happening right now?"

“In his opinion for the 5-4 majority, Chief Justice Roberts conveniently ignores the recent history of voter suppression efforts. The tests and devices that blocked ballot access in the 1960s may be largely gone, but 21st-century tactics to disenfranchise Americans—restrictive voter ID laws, outcome-driven redistricting, limiting voting hours and opportunities, and spreading misinformation about polling places and times—still disproportionately impact African-American, Latino, immigrant and low-income voters, as well as students and seniors."

“The Voting Rights Act is necessary to ensure that our aspirations for a stronger democracy are a reality for all voters. It is a proven tool to ensure voters in covered jurisdictions are not deprived of their fundamental right to vote and to have their vote counted. We can only imagine what assaults on that right will be unleashed without this law in force."

This ruling means that communities that have a proven history of trying to limit voters rights will once again have the free reign to do so.  New Hampshire is one of the many states still fighting back against the right-wing attacks on voters rights.

"Political and legal pushback to overly restrictive rules won't always arrive in time for individual citizens who do not have the right kind of ID," said Professor Justin Levitt, an election law expert engaged in voter protection efforts nationwide. "Organizations like VoteRiders are working to help make sure that eligible voters aren't unfairly locked out of the polls in the meantime."

This decision means that we must work together within our unions and with our community allies to fight back against any form of voter suppression.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (4+ / 0-)

    Together We Can Fight Back Against The Attacks On Labor In America

    by NH LABOR NEWS on Tue Jun 25, 2013 at 07:19:13 PM PDT

  •  I'll Kick It Up to the Photo Version That (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Eric Nelson, NH LABOR NEWS

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Tue Jun 25, 2013 at 07:43:32 PM PDT

  •  These 5 bigots will live long in the book of (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Eric Nelson, NH LABOR NEWS

    infamy for their denigration of the American right to vote especially for Black, Hispanic and Asian Americans but we will all get tarred and feathered with this nasty ruling.

  •  It's good to see labor moving on this,,Texas.. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    ..sure isn't wasting any time

     Justice Ginsburg deserves major Kudos for her dissenting opinion.
    She guts Roberts ruling with the facts citing case after case, instance after instance of voter suppresion by republicans happening today.

    And makes the case to preserve the VRA (one small piece of her opinion):

    The Court holds §4(b) invalid on the ground that it is“irrational to base coverage on the use of voting tests 40years ago, when such tests have been illegal since that time.”Ante, at 23.

    But the Court disregards what Congress set about to do in enacting the VRA. That extraordinary legislation scarcely stopped at the particular tests and devices that happened to exist in 1965.

    The grand aim of the Act is to secure to all in our polity equal citizenship stature, a voice in our democracy undiluted by race.

    As the record for the 2006 reauthorization makes abundantly clear, second generation barriers to minority voting rights have emerged in the covered jurisdictions as attempted substitutes for the first-generation barriers that originally triggered preclearance in those jurisdictions. See supra, at 5–6, 8, 15–17.

    The sad irony of today’s decision lies in its utter failure to grasp why the VRA has proven effective. The Court appears to believe that the VRA’s success in eliminating the specific devices extant in 1965 means that preclearance is no longer needed.

    But this one statement by Justice Ginsburg sums up how wrong Roberts ruling is imo:
    Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.

    Thx NH LABOR NEWS - for the heads up on labor action

    •  Oops forgot the last half of my sentence on Texas (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Texas isn't wasting any time enacting voter suppresion laws. They're already at it.
      Texas voter ID law “will take effect immediately,”

      WASHINGTON — The implications of today’s landmark ruling could be swift and stunning.

      With the Supreme Court suspending the mechanism that forced Texas to get a federal OK before it can implement any election law change, state Attorney General Greg Abbott asserts that nothing now can stop the state from activating its controversial voter ID law.

      That why it's good to hear Labor is up in action

      Thx again NH LABOR NEWS

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site