Skip to main content

I will not waste vast amounts of space repeating what most people have read at great length. I am phrasing my question to refer to the NSA, though doubtless there is an alphabet soup of government agencies here and abroad in involved in the same matters.  I deliberately do not refer to Snowden and his predecessors and hopefully successors (I have an opinion here) in the title; Snowden, et al., are not the issue here.

The issue is the massive and systematic recording of some sort of information from really large numbers of people almost all of whom are not suspected of being criminals.  This recording could be done as now, or not, and for each choice there would be consequences.

The question is whether or not you find the current situation to the extent you know about it to be acceptable or unacceptable, and by a little or a lot.  "somewhat acceptable" or "somewhat unacceptable" implies that you do or do not approve of the situation, but are not motivated to do something about it.  "quite acceptable" or "quite unacceptable" means that you do or do not approve, and are motivated enough to take concrete actions to maintain the status quo (or get more of the same), or to take concrete actions to change the situation in the privacy direction.

Discussing your answer may give people an understanding of your thoughts, and ideas for ways to repeat the poll with a more clever set of choices. If there is enough interest, perhaps PPP will poll something professionally

Poll

As explained above, I find the current situation on privacy to be

77%35 votes
6%3 votes
2%1 votes
13%6 votes

| 45 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (5+ / 0-)

    Restore the Fourth! Save America!

    by phillies on Sun Jul 07, 2013 at 05:42:56 PM PDT

  •  Your Poll needs another option. (6+ / 0-)

    - Where in your wildest dreams would I EVER consider this a good idea?  

    I don't blame Christians. I blame Stupid. Which sadly is a much more popular religion these days.

    by detroitmechworks on Sun Jul 07, 2013 at 05:51:05 PM PDT

  •  Unacceptable. (7+ / 0-)

    Either we are free of unreasonable serach and seizure, or we aren't.

    Recording anything I do is unreasonable partly because there is NO PROBABLE cause other than being here.

    It is also unreasonable because there is no warrant specifying what is sought or to be seized.

    There cannot be a blanket warrant which is, indeed what the FISA court is issuing.

    Really, it's an outrageous, preposterous and unacceptable situation.

    Some "like it" because they have this RIDICULOUS idea that all this unconstitutional shit "keeps me safe. I can live my life free of concern about TERRA!" which is false.

    Some are just going to buy into it.

    But the fact is its wrong up one side and down the other.

    It's no different than a roadblock that is set up to search each car coming down the road: some jackoffs think this is a good thing, but it's unconstitutional, wrong and tantamount to harassment..

    We have the friggin bill of rights for a reason.

    Retaining our rights does NOT let "the terrorists win".

    That said, nobody can stop this shit: somebody is getting rich and fat off PRISM software and related shit. This is a for profit country so this shit will be sold to us - whether we like it or not - and it may or may not work as stated.

    It's outrageous.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site