Skip to main content

In our hyper-partisan world, each time a sex scandal occurs, the other side howls about hypocrisy. How can you excuse Clinton and accuse Sanford? How can you attack Spitzer and defend Vitter? The fact is, this is one area where you can honestly say: both sides do it. Before I go further, I want to also say that this is an area not unique to politics. In my 36 years as a professional educator, I have seen principals, superintendents, professors, and higher education administrators all fall prey to the ways of the flesh. We see it in churches, sports, the world of business.

The question is: why do we forgive some and condemn others? Why do we throw some out on their ears, never to be seen again; while others are just required to spend some time in the wilderness?

I have some thoughts on this in general, but I am going to make it personal. Here are the reasons for my acceptance or rejections of the naughty ones:

1. Competence/deviance hypothesis. Marc Gold, a researcher and practitioner in the field of special education suggested that "the more competent an individual is, the more deviance will be tolerated in him or her by others". Gold was using this premise as a rationale for better training of individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. But it applies to public service. Bill Clinton was forgiven to a great extent because his skills and talents were so extraordinary that as repulsed as many were, we could not see losing his gifts to the nation. This is also why Spitzer, although he did not get a pass, has a pathway back. I think this argument is more acceptable to liberals and Democrats who want government to work, and don't want to abandon those with some of the best ideas.

2. Is there repentance? Among the religious right, this usually means a public confession, preferably with tears and copious mentions of God. But the deeper meaning of repentance (and I learned this in the Christian charismatic movement), is a turning away, a new way of behaving. This is why many Christians continue to rail against Clinton- they cite all the accusations against him over the years. For me, this is the biggest argument for him. After all those years of scandal resulting in the big reveal, it appears he finally got it. I would think if there was the least bit of post Lewinsky dalliance, the right would have found it. This is a big argument against Weiner. He has given no indication that he has changed in any way.

3. The damage done. Who was hurt? And where are they now? Bill hurt Hillary, Chelsea and Monica Lewinsky. Hillary and Chelsea did not give him cheap grace. He had to work hard on healing that family and he did it. Monica was exploited by the right, but had the dignity to withdraw and try to reclaim her life. It was as good an outcome as could be expected. Compare this to John Edwards, who destroyed his marriage, created a new doomed family, ran for office with a barrel of lies. He never seemed to understand the extent of the chaos and pain he inflicted.

4. God-I-hate-a-hypocrite or Schadenfeude. When so called family values folks fall, it is like watching someone slip on a banana peel. It isn't nice to enjoy it, but we do.

5. Home team advantage. Do we forgive Spitzer and condemn Vitter because of competence/deviance, God-I-hate-a-hypocrite, or because he isn't on our team? This is the best test, because the sin was the same- hiring a prostitute. I have to confess to a tendency to forgive Democrats easier than GOP. But I still can't defend Weiner or Edwards.

6. What about love? Many who decried Clinton, defended Sanford, because it was true love: they were soul mates. This included many liberals. i have trouble with this. As a significant other would I be hurt more if he dallied with Monica Lewinsky- recreational sex, or left me for his soul mate (Sanford)? This is my problem with Sanford, Gingrich and McCain- destroying families because they changed their mind (call it heart, if you want- but commitments were broken).

7. Was this a mistake, even a terrible one, or a sign of instability? For me, in one column: Clinton, Spitzer; in the other, Edwards and Weiner. A third column is for those I just find slimy- Sanford, Vitter and Gingrich.


Who is the King of Slime?

10%2 votes
0%0 votes
15%3 votes
15%3 votes
15%3 votes
45%9 votes

| 20 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site