Skip to main content

The deal to link subsidized Stafford loan rates to 10 year Treasury bonds (the Student Loan Certainty Act of 2013) has received a lot of bad press on Kos. However, the deal assures that taxpayers will not lose billions by giving out subsidized Stafford loans far below market rates, and opens up the possibility that Congress will be able to reform federal student loans.

Since the United States does not actually have the money to give out Stafford Loans, it has to first borrow the money from investors and other countries, paying them interest as the government loan is repaid. With the CBO projecting that 10 year treasury bond interest rates will rise to 5.2 percent by 2017 (up from 2.1 percent in 2013), it is estimated that Stafford loan subsidies would cost taxpayers 41 billion over the next decade if restored to the old 3.4 percent rate.

The federal government already loses 3 cents for every one of the billions of dollars it lends out through subsidized Stafford loans, largely due to growing default rates. While the new bill will not solve the problem of loan defaults, it is expected to help stop much of this monetary loss with 715 million in additional revenue over 10 years.

The upside of the new rates are that they create something badly needed by students and the government, student loans that are pretty much revenue-neutral. Believe it or not, according to the CBO, the federal government is projected to make a whopping 173 billion dollars off student loans over the next 10 years. (Side Note: Much of that money will go to fund the Affordable Care Act, in what many would consider a cheap trick, to puff up the bill's budgetary benefits on the back of students–to the tune of 8.7 billion per year).

This revenue largely comes from unsubsidized Stafford loans made to students who do not meet the financial requirements that come with subsidized Stafford loans and PLUS loans made to parents of dependent students that have rates currently as high a 7%.

This brings me to my final point, that the best way to fix federal student loans is to now expand the 'subsidized' Stafford loan program (which isn't very subsidized anymore) to include parents of dependent students and all students who do not have enough money to go through college without taking on debt.

Another solution would be to also raise the cap on 'subsidized' loans that could be taken out from its current palty maximum of $5,500, to something more reasonable. For comparison, the Collegeboard estimates that average public two year college costs an average of $15,586 per year to attend once tuition, room and board, transportation, and supplies are taken into account. If that seems expensive to you, view the statistics on Public In-state, Public Out-of-State, and Private Universities at your own risk.

As always there will be a fight, as banks would surely not be pleased to have the federal government offering student loans at lower rates then they are, and the deficit would grow by about 10.3 billion per year (from lost profits). However, some Republicans like Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI) view the profits as equivalent to taxing students, and rank-and-file Tea Party Representatives would surely love a chance to take away some of the AFA's funding.

In conclusion, on the issue of student loans there is room to compromise, and if the willpower and political courage can be found, Congress can forge a deal to reform student loans and increase access to higher education.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MRA NY

    No-mans-land is a lonely place

    by Bluedawg on Sat Jul 27, 2013 at 05:52:34 PM PDT

  •  "taxpayers will not lose billions by giving out" (0+ / 0-)

    sorry, I didn't read your entire diary, I mostly stopped at this strange sentence.  For example, does anyone ever say:

    "the deal assures that  taxpayers will not lose billions by continued funding of the armed forces?"

    "the deal assures that  taxpayers will not lose billions by paying for roads?"

    "the deal assures that  taxpayers will not lose billions by continued funding of public education"

    "the deal assures that  taxpayers will not lose billions by continued funding of the EPA?"

    Actually, many do say those things.  And simple reflection on who says those sorts of things pretty much overshadows the rest of your diary (hence why I stopped reading).

    To any wingnut: If you pay my taxes I'll give you a job.

    by ban48 on Sun Jul 28, 2013 at 06:17:03 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site